Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

The Integral Index of Business Activity: Methods of Constructing

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-4(95)-78-88

Abstract

The article deals with the formation and use of the business activity index for the analysis, forecasting and regulation of the development of the Russian economy. The possibilities of forming the Business Activity Index of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences by basic spheres of the economy (Index of the Institute of Economics RAS) are analyzed and its advantages are substantiated in comparison with the Index of Output of Goods and Services by the basic types of economic activities of Rosstat (Rosstat Index). The analysis of the dynamics of the IE RAS Index and the Rosstat Index after the socio-economic crisis of 2014–2015 until the second half of 2021, including the period of the coronavirus pandemic, has been carried out. A list of macroeconomic indicators characterizing the level of business activity in the spheres of the national economy included in the IE RAS Index is presented. Analysis and comparison of the dynamics of the IE RAS and Rosstat indices showed that the main advantages of the IE RAS Index lie in a more accurate determination of the timing of the onset and overcoming of crisis processes, as well as the depth of their impact on socio-economic development. Particular attention is paid to the analysis and comparison of the dynamics of business activity in the post-crisis and pandemic periods. It was found that the maximum drop in business activity, caused largely by restrictive measures in connection with the coronavirus pandemic, was observed in 2020. It is noted that the maximum growth in business activity for the period under review fell on the first half of 2021. This growth is confirmed by the dynamics of business activity indices according to the methodology of the Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Rosstat. The paper concludes that the IE RAS Index provides a more accurate integral assessment of the macroeconomic dynamics of business activity; it is proposed to widely use it in state accounting and management, forecasting and strategic planning.

About the Authors

Aleksandr A. Frenkel
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


Boris I. Tikhomirov
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


Yakov V. Sergiyenko
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


Anton A. Surkov
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Aganbegyan A. G. (2020). How to overcome stagnation and a new crisis by ensuring socio-economic growth. Economic Strategies, no. 6, pp. 6–19 (in Russian).

2. Aganbegyan A. G. (2021). On the catastrophic increase in mortality and measures to ensure the people's savings in Russia. Economic Strategies, no. 4, pp. 6–13 (in Russian).

3. Agafonov V. A., Yerznkyan B. A. (2021). System principles of improving strategic management: institutional aspect. Economic Science of Contemporary Russia, no. 2 (93),

4. pp. 57–71 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2021-2(93)-57-71

5. Maksimov V. V. (2020). Paradoxes of social policy in the development of social infrastructure. Economic Strategies, no. 2, pp. 38–43 (in Russian).

6. Sorokin D.Ye. (2019). On Russia's ability to social and economic transformations. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1, pp. 23–28 (in Russian).

7. Sukharev O. S. (2020). The modern world crisis and Russia: diagnostics and overcoming strategies. Economic Strategies, no. 6, pp. 20–31 (in Russian).

8. Tikhomirov B., Frenkel A. (2017). On a single socio-economic policy and strategic planning. Economic Policy, no. 4, pp. 198–233 (in Russian).

9. Frenkel A. A., Volkova N.N., Surkov A. A. (2017). Methodology for constructing integral indices of Russia's economic development. Economics and Entrepreneurship, no. 9 (2), pp. 1183–1193 (in Russian).

10. Frenkel A. A., Sergiyenko YA.V., Matveyeva O. N. (2017). Construction of a business activity index for basic spheres of the economy. Scientific Bulletin of the Gaidar IEP.ru, no. 2, pp. 38–43 (in Russian).

11. Frenkel A. A., Tikhomirov B. I., Volkova N. N., Surkov A. A. (2019). Assessment of the impact of the real sector and non-production spheres on the dynamics of the business activity index. Finance: Theory and Practice, no. 2, pp. 117–133 (in Russian).

12. Frenkel A. A., Tikhomirov B. I., Sergienko Ya. V., Surkov A. A. (2020). Business activity and economic growth. Voprosi Statistiki, no. 6, pp. 66–78 (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Frenkel A.A., Tikhomirov B.I., Sergiyenko Ya.V., Surkov A.A. The Integral Index of Business Activity: Methods of Constructing. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2021;(4):78-88. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-4(95)-78-88

Views: 616


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)