Controversial Results of the Reform of the Russian Electric Power Industry in 1986–2008

The article discusses the ambiguous results of the reform of the Russian electric power industry. Some of the intended goals of the reform have been achieved, while others have not yet been achieved, and the reform should be continued. Although more than 13 years have passed since the final stage of the reform, there is no agreement in the literature on many key issues characterizing the reform: an explanation of the reasons and factors that influenced the decision to reform the Russian electric power industry, the goals of the reform, the type of the reform model, the validity of its adaptation to the real Russian conditions and institutions that had developed by the beginning of the reform, the results of the reform and their value for society. It was found that contradictory results of the reform are caused by both objective and subjective factors. Along with obvious successes (e.g., denationalization of the industry) and obvious failures (including failure to create retail electricity markets) many results (elimination of vertical integration, level of competition on wholesale electricity markets, etc.) are not observable and have not received a clear and unambiguous assessment of their usefulness to society. Studies using modern economic theory and economic-mathematical modeling were required. No statistically significant economies of scale in electricity generation have been found in large companies generating electricity. Thus, the use of competition as a mechanism to coordinate the interests of society, producers and consumers of electricity and the creation of a wholesale electricity market is scientifically justified. Unification of small producers for their withdrawal to the wholesale electricity market should be accompanied by an economic analysis of the cost function of the united company. It is shown that in the short term the wholesale electricity market created in the first and second price zones is close to competitive, but in the long term there is a threat: this market may become uncompetitive.

1. Barkin O. G., Volkova I. O. et al. (2014). Electric Power Industry of Russia: the Problem of Choosing the Strategy of Russia. Analytical Report to the XV April International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development. Moscow. April 1–4, 2014. Moscow: Higher School of Economics Publishing House (in Russian).

2. Belyaev L. S. (2009). Problems of the energy market. Novosibirsk: Nauka (in Russian).

3. Belyaev L. S., Shurupov V. V. (2017). Comparative analysis of wholesale electricity market models. (in Russian). URL: http://electricalnet.ru/blog/viktor-shurupov-proizvyol-sravnitelnyi-analiz-modelei-optovogo-rynka-elektroenergii

4. Bulgakov D., Rasstrigin M., Suverov S. (2014). Results of the RAO “UES of Russia” Reform and Possible Areas of its Model Adjustment. Results of the Electric Power Industry Reform in the Russian Federation. Based on the results of an expert survey. Moscow: Polytechnic University Press (in Russian).

5. Vorobyov M. S. et al. (1987). Power engineering in the USSR in 1986–1990. Ed. A. A. Troitskij. Moscow: Energoatomizdat (in Russian).

6. Zorkaltsev V. I. (2009). Some aspects of reforming the russian electric power industry. Theory and Methods of Decision-Making: Collection of Scientific Works. Novosibirsk: Nauka. Pp. 170–182 (in Russian).

7. Katyshev P. K., Chernavsky S. Y., Eismont O. A. (2012). Estimation of the cost function of electricity production in Russia. In 3 Books // XII International Conference on the problems of societal economic development. Ed. E. G. Yasin. Moscow: State University – ​Higher School of Economics. Рр. 467–478 (in Russian).

8. Knyaginin V. N. (2014). Results of Reforming the Electric Power Industry in the Russian Federation. Based on the results of an expert survey. Ed. by V. N. Knyaginin, M. S. Lipetskaya. St. Petersburg: Polytechnic University Publisher (in Russian).

9. Ozhegov S. I. (1988). Dictionary of the Russian Language. Ed. by N. Y. Shvedova. 20 ed., ster. Moscow: Russian Language (in Russian).

10. Main Directions… (1990). Main Directions of Stabilization of National Economy and Transition to Market Economy, approved by the Resolution of the USSR Supreme Soviet of 19.10, no. 1733-1. Vedomosti SND and the Supreme Soviet of the USSR, no. 43–44 (in Russian).

11. Reichenbach G. (1962). Direction of time. Transl. from English by Yu. B. Molchanov and M. E. Sachkov, ed. by M. E. Omelyanovsky. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publishing House (in Russian).

12. Troitsky A. A. (ed.) (1987). Power Engineering of the USSR in 1986–1990. Moscow: Energoatomizdat (in Russian).

13. Urinson Ya.M., Kozhukhovsky I. S., Sorokin I. S. (2020). Reforming of the Russian electric power industry: results and unresolved issues. HSE Economic Journal, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 323–339 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1813-8691-2020-24-3-323-339

14. Khachaturyan N.R. (2019). The reform of the Russian electric power industry through the eyes of analysts. Part 1: On the urgency and speed of reform. Herald of CEMI. Iss. 1 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33276/S265838870006470-0

15. Chernavsky S.Ya. (2013). Reforms of the Energy Regulated Branches in Russia. Moscow, Saint Petersburg: Nestor-Historia (in Russian).

16. Chernavsky S. Y., Khachaturyan N. R. (2019). The Reform of Russian Electric Power Industry through the Eyes of Analysts. Part 2: Creation of an industry holding and its disintegration. Herald of CEMI. Iss. 2 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33276/S265838870007266-5

17. Chernavsky S.Ya., Khachaturyan N. R., Tsvetaeva Z. N. (2020). Cross-subsidization in tariff design for electricity. Economics and Management: Search, Solutions, July, vol. 3, no. 7 (in Russian).

18. Chubais A. B. (2018). How the reform of RAO UES ended. Vedomosti, June 28. (in Russian). URL:

19. https://www.vedomosti.ru/opinion/articles/2018/06/29/774143-reforma-rao-ees

20. Chubais A. B. (ed.) (2009). Economics and Management in Russia’s Modern Electric Power Industry: A Manual for Managers of Electric Power Companies. Moscow: NPO KONTS UES (in Russian).

21. Christensen L. R., Green W. H. (1976). Economics of Scale in U. S. Electric Power Generation. Journal of Political Economy. August, pp. 655–676.

22. Nerlove M. (1963). Returns to Scale in Electricity Supply. Measurement in Economics. Studies in Mathematical Economics and Econometrics in Memory of Yehuda Grunfeld. Ed. Carl F. Christ. Stanford. California: Stanford Univ. Press.

23. Pittman R. (2007). Restructuring the Russian Electricity Sector: Re-creating California? Energy Policy, vol. 35, pp. 1872–1883.