Soviet Planning: What and Why Is Relevant in the XXI Century

Planning has become widespread in countries with different socio-economic systems. At the same time, both the evaluation of the results of using planned methods and these planned methods themselves have significant differences. They depend both on the features of the socio-economic systems in which planning was applied, and on the tasks that it solved. To study these dependencies, it is useful to turn to the experience of planning in the USSR, which demonstrates different options for using planning methods. During the years of the new economic policy, planning functioned in the conditions of a broad development of market and capitalist relations. Therefore, the planning methods were adapted to the market conditions. The planning itself was mainly indicative, and the achievement of planned results was built by influencing the economic interests of economic entities. Therefore, it is possible to find a significant similarity in the model of Soviet planning during the years of the new economic policy and those planning methods that were used in the post-war period in Europe, Japan, and then in the new industrial countries. The model of directive planning, which was developed in the USSR in the 1930s of the twentieth century, provided both certain advantages in the development of the economy (the mobilization and concentration of significant masses of resources for deep structural changes in the economy, the implementation of large scientific, technical and social projects), and was burdened with serious contradictions. The Soviet model of directive planning did not have effective institutions that expressed the economic interests of enterprises and their collectives, did not create incentives for technical re-equipment of existing enterprises, and ultimately led to the predominance of the interests of the top government departments. To prevent the development of such contradictions, one-sided reflection of the interests of narrow social groups, the planned system should be built on democratic grounds.

1. Avdakov Yu.K., Borodin V. V. (1973). Production associations and their role in the organization of management of Soviet industry (1917–1932). Moscow: Publishing House of Moscow State University (in Russian).

2. Bazarov V. (1924). On the methodology of long-term planning, Moscow: Gosplan (in Russian).

3. Gurevich Kh.O. (1927). General contracts and relations of the state industry with consumer cooperation. Socialist Economy, no. 5–6 (in Russian).

4. Kondrat’ev N.D. (1927). Plan and foresight. Ways of agriculture, no. 2 (in Russian).

5. Lebedeva N. B., Shkaratan O. I. (1966). Essays on the history of socialist competition. Leningrad: Lenizdat (in Russian).

6. Malafeev A. N. (1964). The history of pricing in the USSR (1917–1963). Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).

7. Resolution (1984). Resolution of the XV Congress of the VCP(b) “On directives for drawing up a five-year plan of the national economy”. December 19, 1927. The CPSU in resolutions and decisions of congresses, conferences and plenums of the Central Committee (1898–1986). 9th ed., add. and corr. Vol. 4: 1926–1929. Moscow: Politizdat (in Russian).

8. The Working Class (1968). The Working Class in state administration (1926–1937). Moscow: Mysl (in Russian).

9. Strumilin S. G. (1958). On the planning front. 1920–1930. Moscow: Gospolitizdat (in Russian).

10. Khlynov V. (2000). National planning of a market economy: the experience of Japan. World economy and international relations, no. 8 (in Russian).

11. Balassa B. (1990). Indicative planning in developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 14, iss. 4, pp. 560–574.

12. Devine P. (2002). Participatory Planning through Negotiated Coordination. Science and Society, vol. 66, iss. 1, pp. 72–85.

13. Estrin S., Holmes P. (1983). French Planning in Theory and Practice. London: Allen & Unwin.

14. Gomez-Ramirez L. (2014). On Theories of a Democratic Planned Economy and the Coevolution of “Pro-democratic Planning” Preferences. International Critical Thought, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 178–197.

15. Hahnel R. (2012). Of the People, by the People: The Case for a Participatory Economy. Oakland: Soapbox Press.

16. Kuznets P. (1990). Indicative planning in Korea. Journal of Comparative Economics, vol. 14, iss. 4, pp. 657–676.

17. Laibman D. (2011). Incentive Design, Iterative Planning and Local Knowledge in a Maturing Socialist Economy. International Critical Thought, vol. 1, iss. 1, pp. 35–56.

18. Moriguchi Ch. (1980). Japan's Recent Experiences of Quantitative Economic Planning. Revue économique, vol. 31, no. 5, le VIII plan, pp. 853–856.

19. Rosser J. B., Rosser M. V. (2004). Whither indicative planning, the case of France. Comparative Economics in a Transforming World Economy, pp. 179–201.