Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

Prospects for System Expansion of Institutional Economic Theory

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-3(94)-7-17

Abstract

The article discusses the ways of creating unified economic theory describing the functioning and interaction of significant units of the national economy and the economy as a whole. The general construction of a unified economic theory, its connection with the system economic theory and its system components (object, process, project, environmental economic theories) is determined. Based on the example of institutional economic theory, it is shown that the expansion of its terminology and conceptual apparatus within the framework of the construction of a unified multi-level economic theory allows minimizing the contradictions between the “old” and “new” institutionalism, methodological individualism and methodological holism. This expansion is carried out following the principle of the maximum possible system community in two lines. The first line is expanding the subject area (along with organizations as systems of the object type, systems of the process, project, the environment types are also considered as the focal subject of study). The second line is the expanding the instrumental area (analysis of the influence on the behavior of agents from not only institutional subsystems but also information, infrastructural, network, mental, and other environmental subsystems). As a result, each system receives the compact and maximum volumetric internal systemic content and, at the same time, the minimum volumetric external systemic environment, which creates conditions for the effective application of the duality principle in the theory of economic systems. Thus, the system expansion of institutional theory should take place in two lines: content of the theory per se and creation of its immediate environment.

About the Author

Georgе B. Kleiner
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute at the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow; State University of Management, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Akaev A. A. (2011). Strategic management of sustainable development based on the theory of innovation-cyclical economic growth of Schumpeter-Kondratyev. Economics and Management, no. 3, pp. 4–10 (in Russian).

2. Gorshkov A. V. (2012). Can economic theory be universal, or why do we need a theory of the national economy of Russia? Bulletin of the Ural State University of Economics, no. 4 (42),

3. pp. 11–19 (in Russian).

4. Grigoryev L. (2017). Two discourses in Russian economic science. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 9, pp. 135–158 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2017-9-135-158

5. Kirdina S. (2013). Methodological individualism and methodological institutionalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 10, pp. 66–89 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2013-10-66-89

6. Kleiner G. B. (2011). New theory of economic systems and its applications. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 81, no. 9, pp. 794–808 (in Russian).

7. Kleiner G. (2013). System Economics as a Platform for development of modern Economic Theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 6, pp. 4–28 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2013-6-4-28

8. Kleiner G. B. (2014). Why is economics not a system science? Evolution of economic theory: Reproduction, technology, institutions. Materials of the X International Symposium on Evolutionary Economics. Pushkino, September 12–14, 2013. Moscow: IE RAN (in Russian).

9. Kleiner G. B. (2019). The principles of duality in the light of the system economic theory. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11, pp. 127–149 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2019-11-127-149

10. Makarov V. L., Kleiner G. B. (2004). Knowledge and institutions: «parallel» analysis. Strategic planning and development of enterprises. Materials of the V All-Russian Symposium (Moscow, April 2004). Section 1. Moscow: CEMI RAN (in Russian).

11. Polte­rovich V. M. (2011). Formation of general social analysis. Social Sciences and Contemporary World, no. 2, pp. 101–111 (in Russian).

12. Tambovtsev V. L. (2021). Is unified institutional economics possible? Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 1, pp. 33–51

13. (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2021-1-33-51

14. Wilber K. (2006). A brief history of everything. Moscow: AST: Astrel. 476 p. (in Russian).

15. Frolov D. P. (2020). Post-institutionalism: Beyond the institutional mainstream. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 5,

16. pp. 107–140 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32609/0042-8736-2020-5-107-140

17. Klinec I. (2015). New paradigm of syntropic economic theory. 1st Vienna Conference on Pluralism in Economics. WU, Vienna University of

18. Economics and Business. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.1304.9767

19. Slangen L. H.G., Loucks L., Slangen, A.H.L. (2008). Institutional economics and economic organization theory: an integrated approach. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.

20.


Review

For citations:


Kleiner G.B. Prospects for System Expansion of Institutional Economic Theory. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2021;(3):7-17. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-3(94)-7-17

Views: 613


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)