Risk Management as a Tool in the Development of Socio-Economic Ecosystems
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-1(92)-40-51
Abstract
The main problems of sustainable development of business ecosystems are considered. It is proved that promising business ecosystems need to master and use modern, including digital, technologies in managing the level of risk. The purpose of this study is to expand the types of tools that can be used to manage the risk level of failure to achieve sustainable development of business ecosystems. To study the problems of risk management and identify the characteristics of the risk phenomenon in the activities of business ecosystems, the methodology and applied tools of the system economic theory and the operational theory of risk management are used. It is shown that the management of risk of harm to the environment, in the social sphere, and development of anti-risk impacts, reducing the level of risk of not achieving the necessary quality of management, improve the investment attractiveness of economic agents, members of the business ecosystem. The realization research may be of interest to enterprises and organizations that are developing their own strategies for sustainable development within the framework of emerging business ecosystems, or developing their own strategy for choosing and joining some hypothetical business ecosystem.
Keywords
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL): L26, M21, O33
About the Authors
Roman M. KachalovRussian Federation
Yuliya A. Sleptsova
Russian Federation
References
1. Akatkin Y., Karpov O., Konyavskiy V., Yasinovskaya E. (2017). Digital economy: Conceptual architecture of a digital economic sector ecosystem. Business Informatics, no. 4 (42), pp. 17–28 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17323/1998-0663.2017.4.17.28
2. Androsik Yu.N. (2016). Business ecosystems as a form of cluster development. Proceeding of BSTU (Minsk), no. 7 (189), pp. 38–43 (in Russian).
3. Belik I.S., Starodubets N.V., Shutkina D.N. (2013). Assessment of threats to assimilative capacity of a territory from antropoganic impact. Bulletin of Ural Federal University. Series: Economics and Management, no. 5, pp. 131–139 (in Russian).
4. Vostrikova E.O., Meshkova A.P. (2020). ESG Criteria in Investment: Foreign and Russian Experience. Financial Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 117–129 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31107/ 2075-1990-2020-4-117-129
5. Ivanov D.A., Ivanova M. A., Sokolov B.V. (2018). Analysis of transformation trends in enterprise management principles in the era of Industry 4.0 technology. SPII RAS Proceedings, no. 60 (5), pp. 97–127 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15622/sp.60.4
6. Karpinskaya V.A. (2018). Ecosystem as a unit of economic analysis. Conference: System Problem of the Domestic Mesoeconomics, Microeconomics, and Economics of Enterprises. Vol. 2. Moscow, СEMI RAN, рр. 124-141. (in Russian). DOI: 10.33276/978-5-8211-0769-5-125-141
7. Castells M. (2000). Information age. Transl. in Russian. Moscow, NRU HSE. 608 p. (in Russian).
8. Kachalov R. M. (2012). Economic risk management: Theoretical foundations and applications. Saint Petersburg, Nestor-Istoria. 288 p. (in Russian).
9. Kachalov R.M. (2020). Risk phenomenon as an artificial economic science object. Issues of Risk Analysis, no. 17 (1), pp. 100–108 (in Russian). DOI: 10.32686/1812-5220-2020-17-1-100-108
10. Kachalov R.M., Sleptsova Y.A. (2015). Structuration of system and economic space of enterprise and risk management. Russian Management Journal, no. 13 (4), pp. 69–84 (in Russian).
11. Kleiner G. B. (2019a). Ecosystem economics: A step into the future. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1 (59), pp. 40–45 (in Russian).
12. Kleiner G. B. (2019b). Modern University as an Ecosystem: Institutions of Interdisciplinary Management. Journal of Institutional Studies, no. 11 (3), pp. 54–63 (in Russian).
13. Kobylko A. A. (2019). Ecosystem companies: The stages of developments and limits. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 4, pp. 126–135 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2019-4(87)-126-136
14. Kuklin A.A., Pecherkina M.S., Tyrsin A. N., Surina A.A. (2017). Methodological tools for detection of risks to the welfare of the individuals and the territory of residence. Ekonomika Regiona (Economy of Region), no. 13 (4), pp.1030–1043 (in Russian).
15. Kupriyanovsky V., Namiot D., Drozhzhinov V., Kupriyanovsky J., Ivanov M. (2016). Internet of things in industrial plants. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, no. 4 (12), pp. 69–78 (in Russian).
16. Livshits V. N. (2013). Fundamentals of systems thinking and systems analysis. Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS. 54 p. (in Russian).
17. Muravsky D.V., Yablonsky S.A. (2015). Multilateral platform principles. Innovations, no. 3(197), pp. 45–49 (in Russian).
18. Panyushkin S. V. (2010). Co-evolution of economic agents as a mechanism of sustainable development and the influence of the institutional environment on it. Ideas and Ideals, no. 2, pp. 16–25 (in Russian).
19. Ryzhikov D.M. (2017). Method of processing multispectral satellite data for solving the problem of controlling the growth zones of Sosnovsky hogweed. Information and Control Systems, no. 6 (91), pp. 43–51 (in Russian).
20. Stepanova V.V., Ukhanova A.V., Grigorischin A.V., Yakhyaev D.V. (2019). Assessment of digital ecosystems of Russian regions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 73–90 (in Russian). DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.2.62.4
21. Iansiti M., Levien R. (2004). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation and sustainability. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press. 304 p.
22. Jacobides M., Cennamo C., Gawer A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 39, iss. 8, pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904
23. Komljenovic D. et al. (2016). Risks of extreme and rare events in Asset Management. Safety Science, vol. 88, pp. 129–145.
24. Moore J. F. (1998). The rise of a new corporate form. Washington Quarterly, vol. 21 (1), pp. 167–181.
25. Stam E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1759–1769.
26. Ufua D.E., Papadopoulos T., Midgley G. (2018). Systemic lean intervention: Enhancing lean with community operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, no. 268 (3),
27. pp. 1134–1148.
28. Upward A., Jones P. (2016). An ontology for strongly sustainable business models: Defining an enterprise framework compatible with natural and social science. Organization & Environment, no. 29 (1), pp. 97–123.
29. Yablonsky S. (2018). A Multidimensional framework for digital platform innovation and management: From business to technological platforms. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, vol. 35, iss. 4. DOI: 10.1002/sres.2544
30. Yablonsky S. (2020). A multidimensional platform ecosystem framework, Kybernetes, ahead-of-print.DOI: 10.1108/K‑07-2019-0447
31. Yearworth M., White L. (2014). The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition. European Journal of Operational Research, no. 237 (3),
32. pp. 932–945.
Review
For citations:
Kachalov R.M., Sleptsova Yu.A. Risk Management as a Tool in the Development of Socio-Economic Ecosystems. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2021;(1):40-51. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-1(92)-40-51