Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

Information Openness of Regional Development Agencies in Russia: Trends and Forecasts

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-1(92)-23-39

Abstract

During last decades Russia was in the process of forming a market of regional development institutions, the structure of which includes such managing entities as regional development corporations (agencies). The article examines the information openness of Russian regional development corporations (RDC). It gives quantitative assessment and shows the qualitative transformation of this phenomenon in 2016 and 2020. The official websites and portals of these organizations are used as information base. Comparison information openness ratings of the Russian RDC for 2016 and 2020, built by the authors, allowed establishing few important facts and trends’ development. Firstly, the number of RDCs is slowly but surely growing. Secondly, their information openness has slightly increased over the last four years. Thirdly, the difference between the indicators of information openness of the RDC has sharply decreased, what indicates an increase in competition between these structures in the all-Russian information market. Fourthly, the work to improve awareness of RDC activities is spontaneous and does not involve any reporting standards. The experience of Canada and Australia was considered to identify management reserves in the work of Russian RDCs. That allowed to formulate few proposals. First, it is advisable to increase the number of domestic RDCs by 2–3 times. Secondly, a unified standard for RDC corporate reporting and a Federal portal with their contact details are necessary. Thirdly, RDC should not only participate in the implementation of regional projects, but also develop a promising model for the development of the territory, considering its specifics, which is currently absent.

About the Authors

Evgeny V. Balatsky
Center for Macroeconomic Research, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow; Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation


Nataly A. Ekimova
Center for Macroeconomic Research, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
Russian Federation


References

1. Balatsky E. V. (2011). Russian Regional investment forums: attraction assessment. Measurements World, no. 11 (129), pp. 42–50 (in Russian).

2. Balatsky E. V. (2020). Regional development agencies and their specificities: international experience. Nation’s Capital (in Russian). URL: http://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/agentstva_regionalnogo_razvitiya_i_ih_osobennosti_mezhdunarodnyj_opyt/

3. Balatsky E. V. (2013). Russian Investment Forums as the Regional Development Institute. Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 2 (18), pp. 101–128 (in Russian).

4. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A. (2020). Modern ways to boost economic growth in regions. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 74–92 (in Russian).

5. Balatsky E. V., Ekimova N. A., Yurevich M. A. (2019). Formation of regional development institutes in Russian. Municipal Academy, no. 3, pp. 95–100 (in Russian).

6. Gusev A. B. (2015a). Resonance product and its specificities. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 07–08 (in Russian). URL: https://www.ng.ru/ideas/2015-07-08/5_rezonans.html

7. Gusev A. B. (2015b). Strategy boys. Why does Putin need young authors of the “national initiatives”? Nation’s Capital. (in Russian). URL: https://kapital-rus.ru/articles/article/malchiki-strategi._zachem_putinu_molodye_avtory_nacionalnyh_iniciativ/

8. Gusev A. B., Doronina E. G. (2020). Airshow as a Driver of Regional Development. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 83–98 (in Russian).

9. Ekimova N. A. (2020). Project management as a factor of economic growth activation in the regions. Economics, Taxes & Law, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 112–122 (in Russian).

10. Ekimova N. A. (2020). Regional development agencies of the United Kingdom. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 42–59 (in Russian).

11. Polterovich V. M. (2016). Institutions of catching-up development (on the project of a new model for economic development of Russia). Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, no. 5,

12. pp. 34–56 (in Russian).

13. Polterovich V. M. (2018). Federal Development Agency: It is Needed to Design and Implement Successful Strategies. International Journal of Management Theory and Practice, no. 3, pp. 35–41 (in Russian).

14. Tatarkin A. I., Kotlyarova S. N. (2013). Regional Development Institutions as an Economic Growth Factors. Economy of Region, vol. 3 (35), pp. 18–26 (in Russian).

15. Shkuropat A. V. (2020). Applying Canadian Experience in Regional Policy Strengthening. Russian Foreign Economic Journal, no. 2, pp. 107–118 (in Russian).

16. Yurevich M. A. (2020). Institute of Investment Forums: Advanced Foreign Experience. Journal of Economic Regulation, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 73–82 (in Russian).

17. Benedek J., Horvath R. (2008). Regional Development in Romania. URL: https://www.regionalstudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/countryreps-romania.pdf

18. Bradford N. (2018). Canadian regional development policy: Flexible governance and adaptive implementation. Paris: OECD. 32 p.

19. Cozzarin B. P. (2008). Data and Measurement of R&D Program Impacts. Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 284–298.

20. Eroglu N., Eroglu I., Ozturk M., Aydin H. I. (2014). Development agencies on the way to regional development: Romania-Turkey comparison. Procedia of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 214–221.

21. Halkier H. (1992). Development agencies and regional policy: The case of the Scottish Development Agency. Regional Politics and Policy, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–26.

22. Halkier H., Danson M. (1997). Regional development agencies in Western Europe: a survey of key characteristics and trends. European Urban and Regional Studies, vol. 4 (3), pp. 243–256.

23. Halkier H., Danson M., Dambor C. (1998). Regional development agencies in Europe. London: Jessica Kingsley. 374 p.

24. Hughes J., Sasse G., Gordon C. (2004). Europeanization and regionalization in the EU’s enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 231 p.

25. Maude A., Beer A. (2000). Regional development agencies in Australia: A comparative evaluation of institutional strengths and weaknesses. The Town Planning Review, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 1–24.

26. Salvador R., Juliao R. P. (2000). Regional Development Agencies in Portugal. URL: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/cc18/61711fafa6beaea0bae1e0ad8cc39a9a0dc6.pdf?_ga=2.42817901.919716742.1587215455-1302553556.1585572547

27. Savoie D. J. (2003). Reviewing Canada’s Regional Development Efforts. URL: https://www.gov.nl.ca/publicat/royalcomm/research/Savoie.pdf

28. Savoie D. J. (2000). Community economic development in Atlantic Canada: False hope or panceal? Ottawa: The Canadian Institute for Research on Regional Development. 132 p.

29. Toktas Y., Sevinc H., Bozkurt E. (2013). The evolution of regional development agencies: Turkey case. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, vol. 15, iss. 2, pp. 670–681.

30. Toktas Y., Botoc C., Kunu S., Prozan R. (2018). The regional development agency experiences of Turkey and Romania. Business and Economics Research Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 253–270.

31. Yuill D. (1982). Regional development agencies in Europe. Aldershot: Gower, 449 p.


Review

For citations:


Balatsky E.V., Ekimova N.A. Information Openness of Regional Development Agencies in Russia: Trends and Forecasts. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2021;(1):23-39. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-1(92)-23-39

Views: 846


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)