Property as an Object of Theoretical Research: Political Economy and Economic Policy
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-4(91)-7-24
Abstract
The article reveals the understanding of property in institutionalism and in classical political economy with an emphasis on the Marxist direction of the latter. It is shown that in the works of modern authors belonging to the Post-Soviet School of Critical Marxism – one of the main directions of modern theory of classical political economy in Russia – the specific, concrete historical content of property relations is firstly investigated. This content in the framework of this direction, inheriting the tradition of the “Tsagolovskaya” school of political economy, is connected through the system of production relations of a particular society. It is shown that both private and public forms of property have different socio-economic contents in historically different socio-economic systems – pre-bourgeois, bourgeois, post-capitalist. The author proposes political and economic systematization of patterns of property that are characteristic of the modern stage of economic development, which in the article is defined as late capitalism. These forms include not only different types of private and public property, but also transitional forms that contradictory combine private-capitalist and associated forms of appropriation. It is specially emphasized that public property is not reducible to state property and includes a special type of relationship – “ownership by everybody of everything”, which is characteristic of the sphere of co-creation. It is shown that in certain types of economy, state ownership can hide relations not only of public, but also of private-capitalist appropriation, as well as non-economic coercion. The contradictions of the transformation of property relations under the conditions of late capitalism and the most relevant practical problems associated with this are revealed.
The article includes a polemic dialogue of the author with representatives of the institutional direction and the works of George B. Kleiner.
About the Author
Alexandr V. BuzgalinRussian Federation
References
1. Bodrunov S. D. (2016). Forthcoming. New Industrial Society: Reloading. 2nd corr. & extend. Ed. Saint Petersburg, INIR named after S.Yu. Witte (in Russian).
2. Bodrunov S. D. (2018). Noonomy. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya (in Russian).
3. Bodrunov S. D. (2019). The state and revolution. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1, pp. 9–16 (in Russian).
4. Buzgalin A. V. (2018). Late capitalism and its limits: dialectics of productive forces and production relations (to the 200th birth anniversary of Karl Marx). Questions of Political Economy, no. 2, pp. 10–38 (in Russian).
5. Buzgalin A. V. (2019). State in the economy of the XXI century: Political economy interpretation. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (86), pp. 7–18 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2019-3(86)-7-18
6. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2019). Social structure transformation of late capitalism: From proletariat and bourgeoisie towards precariat and creative class? Sociological Studies (Socis), no. 1, pp. 18–28 (in Russian).
7. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2019b) Global Capital. In 2 vols. 5th ed. Moscow, LENAND (in Russian).
8. Bulavka-Buzgalina L.A. (2018). Disalienation: From philosophical abstraction to sociocultural practices. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 6, pp. 202–214 (in Russian).
9. Galbraith J. K. (1969). The new industrial state. Moscow, Progress (in Russian).
10. Ilyenkov E. V. (1997). Dialectics of the abstract and concrete in scientific-theoretical thinking. Moscow, ROSSPAN (in Russian).
11. Kleiner G. (2017). From the economy of individuals to systemic economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 56–74 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2017-8-56-74
12. Kleiner G. B. (2018). Three questions to political economy (An attempt of system introspection). Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 118–127 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2018-8-118-127
13. Kolganov A. (2017). To the critique of the “power-property” concept. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7, pp. 79–95 (in Russian).
14. Kolganov A. I. (1993). Collective ownership and collective entrepreneurship. Moscow, Economic Democracy (in Russian).
15. Kolganov A. I. (2019). The future of state in the economy: Russian discussions and their international context. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (86), pp. 18–29 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2019-3(86)-18-29
16. Collective forms of economic management in modern economy (2017). Ed. by G. B. Kleiner. Moscow, Scientific Library (in Russian).
17. Komolov O. O. (2016). Socio-alteration as a Notion of the Modern Political Economy. Questions of Political Economy, no. 3, pp. 97–107 (in Russian).
18. The course of political economy (1974). In 2 vols. Ed. by N. A. Tsagolov. 3rd ed., corr. & add. T. 2. Moscow, Ekonomika (in Russian).
19. Mavrodeas S. (2019) Financialization Hypothesis: A Creative Contribution or a Theoretical Blind Alley? Questions of Political Economy, no. 1, pp. 68–81 (in Russian).
20. Marx K. (1960) Capital. Vol. I. In: Marx K., Engels F. Collected Works. 2nd ed., vol. 23. Moscow, Gospolitizdat (in Russian).
21. Marx K. (1969) Economic Manuscripts of 1857–1859. In: Marx K., Engels F. Collected Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 46. Part II. Moscow, Gospolitizdat (in Russian).
22. Oleynik A. (2001). Business by the code: the institutional model of Russian capitalism. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 5, pp. 4–25 (in Russian).
23. Sifakis-Kapetanakis C. (2019). New Factors in Global Finances and the Financialization of Capitalism. Questions of Political Economy, no. 1, pp. 82–93 (in Russian).
24. Fine B. (2019) Financialization through Marxist Perspective. Questions of Political Economy, no. 1, pp. 34–49 (in Russian).
25. Habibullin R. I. (2018). Joint-stock companies of employees: Current state, problems and prospects of development. Alternatives, no. 1, pp. 96–116 (in Russian).
26. Shkredov V. P. (1973). Method of research of property in “Kapital” by K. Marx. Moscow, MGU (in Russian).
27. Yakovleva N. G. (2018). Education in Russia: public good or commercial service? Sociological Studies (Socis), no. 3, pp. 149–153 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0132162518030182
28. Amin S. (2003). Obsolescent Capitalism: Contemporary Politics and Global Disorder. London, Zed Books.
29. Brabham D. C. (2013). Crowdsourcing. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
30. Coase R. (1992). The Institutional Structure of Production (Nobel Prize lecture). The American Economic Review, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 713–719.
31. Crane A. (2013). Modern slavery as a management practice: exploring the conditions and capabilities for human exploitation. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 38, issue 1, pp. 49–69.
32. Demsetz G. (1997). The Economics of the firm: Seven critical commentaries. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
33. Jameson F. (1991). Postmodernism, or The cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, Duke University Press.
34. Harvey D. (2004). The 'new' imperialism: accumulation by dispossession. Socialist Register, vol. 40, pp. 63–87.
35. Kotz D. M. (2015). The rise and fall of neoliberal capitalism. Cambridge, Mass. and London, England: Harvard University Press.
36. Mandel E. (1975). Late capitalism. London, Humanities Press.
37. Mason P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. London, Allen Lane.
Review
For citations:
Buzgalin A.V. Property as an Object of Theoretical Research: Political Economy and Economic Policy. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2020;(4):7-24. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-4(91)-7-24