Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

Comparative Analysis of Various Approaches to Calculating Labour Productivity

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-3(90)-117-131

Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of analyzing the methodological foundations for assessing the dynamics of labour productivity in the regions of Russia in the context of the digital transformation of the economy. The identification of differences in the level of labour productivity and employment and the influencing factors is a necessary requirement for building a competent regional socio-economic policy in the new institutional conditions. Calculations of labour productivity are carried out by various international and national organizations that use a variety of methods for measuring this indicator. The presence of a sufficiently large number of methods for measuring productivity leads to the fact that each one gives its own result and different dynamics. The authors set the task to consider the existing methodological approaches to calculating labor productivity and to analyze how much they affect the results. The authors statistically tested the hypothesis of heterogeneity of ratings obtained by various methods. The calculations were made on the basis of data from Rosstat for the regions of Russia for the period from 2013 to 2018. To study the uniformity of the series, various statistical criteria were used. The analysis showed that in all years of the period under review the samples are heterogeneous. Consequently, the development of managerial decisions substantially depends on the methodology used to calculate the labour productivity index. The authors concluded that it is necessary to build an index of labour productivity based on regression dependencies on indicators reflecting the main factors affecting regional labor productivity. It helps to get a more effective assessment of regional differences in its level and dynamics. This index should be built for each region taking into account its industry specifics and the level of development of new digital technologies.

About the Authors

Nataliia N. Volkova
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


Evelyna I. Romanyuk
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


Alexander A. Frenkel
Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation


References

1. Aganbegyan A. G. (1979). Management of socialist production: issues of theory and practice. Moscow, Ekonomika. 448 р. (in Russian).

2. Ayvazyan S. A. (1968). Statistical study of dependencies. Moscow, Metallurgy. 176 р. (in Russian).

3. Andreeva L.Yu., Dgemayev O. T. (2017). The impact of digital economy on the formation of new trends in the Russian labor market. State and Municipal Management. Scientific Notes of SKAGS, no. 34, pp. 25–32 (in Russian).

4. Bessonov V. A., Gimpelson V. E., Yasin E. G., Kuzminov Ya.I. (2010). Productivity and factors of long-term development of the Russian. X International scientific conference on economic and social development. Moscow, Publishing house of HSE (Higher School of Economics), pp. 11–61 (in Russian).

5. Burtseva T. A. (2017). Econometric models of regional labor productivity. Voprosy Statistiki (Problems of Statistics), no. 3, pp. 30–36 (in Russian).

6. Voskoboynikov I. B., Gimpelson V. E. (2015). Productivity growth, structural shifts and informal employment in the Russian economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11, pp. 30–61 (in Russian).

7. Kapelyuk Z. A. (2018). Comparative analysis of labor productivity in Russia and other countries. Consumer Cooperation (Gomel), no. 1 (60), pp. 59–63 (in Russian).

8. Conceptual aspects of Russian economic development: challenges and priorities (2020). Under editorship of E. V. Ustyuzhanina, M. V. Dubovik. Moscow, RUSYNS. 234 с. (in Russian).

9. Lobanova V. A., Trofimova N. V. (2015). Dynamics of labor productivity: Calculation and regional peculiarities. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Series: Economics. Management. Law, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 125–131 (in Russian).

10. Novogilov V. V. (1972). Problems of measuring costs and results in optimal planning. Moscow, Nauka. 432 р. (in Russian).

11. Notkin A. I. (1984). Problems of socialist reproduction. Moscow, Nauka. 296 р. (in Russian).

12. Rumantseva E. E. (2018). Russian industry: problems and ways of further development. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 151–158; no 3, pp. 226–234 (in Russian).

13. Sizova I. L., Husyainov T. M. (2017) Labor and employment in the digital economy: problems of the Russian labor market. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Sociology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 376–396 (in Russian).

14. Strumilin S. G. (1984). Problems of labor Economics. Moscow, Ekonomika. 457 р. (in Russian).

15. Tatevosyan G. M., Sedova S. V. (2001). Labor productivity: Macroeconomics, industries, regions. Preprint # WP/2001/116. Moscow, CEMI RAS. 55 р. (in Russian).

16. Fedchenko A. A. (2018) Transformation of social and labor relations in the digital economy. Bulletin оf Voronezh State University. Series: Economics and Management, no. 3, pp. 91–95 (in Russian).

17. Frenkel A. A. (1984). Labour productivity: problems of growth modeling. Moscow, Ekonomika. 176 р. (in Russian).

18. Chernopyatov A. M. (2017). On the issue of labor productivity in the Russian Federation. Economy: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow, vol. 7, no. 12a, pp. 131–144 (in Russian).

19. Sielska A., Pawłowska A. (2015). Regional disparities in labour productivity in Poland: a spatial statistics approach. Global Journal of Business, Economics and Management, vol. 5(2), pp. 53–62.

20. Solow R. M.A. (1956). Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 70, no. 1, рp. 65–94.


Review

For citations:


Volkova N.N., Romanyuk E.I., Frenkel A.A. Comparative Analysis of Various Approaches to Calculating Labour Productivity. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2020;(3):117-131. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-3(90)-117-131

Views: 1298


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)