The Concept of Noonomy as a Methodological Platform for Predictive Socio-Economic Research (Review of the monograph Bodrunov S. D. “Noonomy” )
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-2(89)-160-168
Abstract
The significance of the concept of noonomy developed in the works of Professor S. D. Bodrunov, including his monograph “Noonomy”, is wider than just a hypothesis that paints a picture of promising shifts in the socio-economic structure of society. Since this concept is based on the study of a number of real trends in the development of material production and human knowledge – both technological and socio-economic, to the extent it creates theoretical and methodological prerequisites for the study of the further evolution of human civilization.
Highlighting the patterns of this evolution is the growth of knowledge intensity of production, increase of knowledge capacity of product, the trend to the predominance of the weight of knowledge on material costs in the cost structure of production, the displacement of people from the immediate process of production – the concept of noonomy allows you to see a number of intermediate steps leading, ultimately, to the formation of a non-economic society and non-economic way of productive activity. One of these steps is the formation of a new industrial society of the second generation (NIO.2).
Those deep technological shifts that lead to the formation of NIO.2, carry with them not only new opportunities for human development and meeting its needs, but also the growing risks of technogenic pressure on nature, and reckless interference in the nature of man himself. Economic rationality turns into inflating simulative needs in the pursuit of sales expansion and profit, leading to an increasing absorption of resources. There is a movement to the civilizational crisis, to the point of bifurcation, beyond which the resolution of these problems should be achieved by changing the criteria base of economic activity by moving away from economic rationality, and a corresponding change in the social structure.
The identification of these distant strategic development prospects in S. D. Bodrunov's works allows us to take an appropriate look at the immediate pragmatic goals. In particular, the solution of the problem of reindustrialization of Russia appears, from this point of view, not only as a tactical necessity, but also as a necessary prerequisite for entering the strategic highway of development.
Keywords
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL): A13; B40; L50; O30; P10
About the Author
Andrey I. KolganovRussian Federation
References
1. Levina I. (2006). To the problem of balance of real and financial sectors in the economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 9 (in Russian).
2. Bodrunov S. D. (2014). Reindustrialisation of Russian economy: the analysis of risks in the sphere of intellectual property under the realization of the politic of import substitution. Intellectual Property Right, no. 6 (in Russian).
3. Marx K., Engels F. (1969). Collected works. Vol. 46, part II. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature (in Russian).
4. Bodrunov S. D., Lopatin V. N. (2014). Intellectual property. The distribution of intellectual rights on protected results of intellectual activity, creating and/or using under the execution of research, development, technological and production works, between customer, contractor and author. Saint-Petersburg, Institute of New Industrial Development (INID) (in Russian).
5. Suleymanova L. A., Pogorelova I. A., Marushko M. V. (2018). The essence of additive technologies in the construction industry. University Science, no. 2 (6) (in Russian).
6. Bodrunov S. D. (2018a). Nooindustrial production: the step to the non-economic development. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1 (55) (in Russian).
7. National economy of USSR in 1990 (statistical yearbook). (1991). Moscow: Finansy i Statistika (in Russian).
8. Bodrunov S. D. (2018b). Noonomy. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya (Cultural Revolution) (in Russian).
9. Bastani A. (2019). Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto. London: Verso.
10. Galbraigh J.K. (2008). New Industrial State. Serial “Anthology of economic thought”. Moscow, Eksmo (in Russian).
11. Bell D. (1973). The Coming Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
12. Dresvyannikov V. A., Strakhov E. P. (2018). Classification of additive technologies and analysis of the directions of its economic usage. Models, systems, nets in the economy, technic, nature and society, no. 2 (26) (in Russian).
13. Machlup F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
14. Levina I. (2006). To the problem of balance of real and financial sectors in the economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 9 (in Russian).
15. Marshall A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Eighth edition. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
16. Marx K., Engels F. (1969). Collected works. Vol. 46, part II. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature (in Russian).
17. Mason P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. London: Allen Lane.
18. Suleymanova L. A., Pogorelova I. A., Marushko M. V. (2018). The essence of additive technologies in the construction industry. University Science, no. 2 (6) (in Russian).
19. Pitts F. H. (2017). Beyond the fragment: Postoperaismo, postcapitalism and Marx’s “Notes on machine”, 45 years on. Economy and Society, vol. 46, iss. 3–4, p. 324–345.
20. National economy of USSR in 1990 (statistical yearbook). (1991). Moscow: Finansy i Statistika (in Russian).
21. Roco M., Bainbridge W. (2004). Overview converging technologies for improving human performance. Roco M., Bainbridge W. (eds). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Arlington: U. S. National Science Foundation. P. 1.
22. Bastani A. (2019). Fully Automated Luxury Communism: A Manifesto. London: Verso.
23. Srnicek N., Williams A. (2016). Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work. 2nd ed. London, Verso.
24. Bell D. (1973). The Coming Post-industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
25. Schumpeter J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
26. Machlup F. (1962). The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
27. Schumpeter J. (1939). Business cycles. Vol. 2. New York, McGraw-Hill.
28. Marshall A. (1920). Principles of Economics. Eighth edition. London: Macmillan and Co., Ltd.
29. Stiglitz J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York – London, W. W. Norton & Company.
30. Mason P. (2015). Postcapitalism: A guide to our future. London: Allen Lane.
31. Pitts F. H. (2017). Beyond the fragment: Postoperaismo, postcapitalism and Marx’s “Notes on machine”, 45 years on. Economy and Society, vol. 46, iss. 3–4, p. 324–345.
32. Roco M., Bainbridge W. (2004). Overview converging technologies for improving human performance. Roco M., Bainbridge W. (eds). Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology and Cognitive Science. Arlington: U. S. National Science Foundation. P. 1.
33. Srnicek N., Williams A. (2016). Inventing the future: Postcapitalism and a world without work. 2nd ed. London, Verso.
34. Schumpeter J. (1911). The theory of economic development. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
35. Schumpeter J. (1939). Business cycles. Vol. 2. New York, McGraw-Hill.
36. Stiglitz J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York – London, W. W. Norton & Company.
Review
For citations:
Kolganov A.I. The Concept of Noonomy as a Methodological Platform for Predictive Socio-Economic Research (Review of the monograph Bodrunov S. D. “Noonomy” ). Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2020;(2):160-168. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-2(89)-160-168