NETWORK ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES OF PRODUCTION OF HIGH-TECH PRODUCTS AS A TOOL OF TECHNOLOGICAL BREAKTHROUGH IN RUSSIA

The paper deals with the problems of reforming the organization of the production of high-tech products in Russia. A comparative analysis of the state and significance of these industries in the economies of developed countries and Russia shows the need for reforming the structural organization of production. On the example of the aviation industry, an analysis of the improvement of industrial production was carried out. Evaluation of the effectiveness of relevant measures shows that they contribute to the conservation of closed obsolete business-production models, monopolization of the final integrator in accessing and using investments, low labor productivity and outflow of personnel, lack of effective interaction of the scientific and technological sector with domestic academic university science. This impedes the formation of the competencies necessary to carry out a technological breakthrough and increase the competitiveness of the industry in the global market.The paper presents a model of vertical integration of the technological chain of value added reproduction in the form of network organizational structures of suppliers of modules, units and nodes of the final complex technology based on domestic manufacturers. The paper discusses the benefits of the heliocentric organization of the production of the final complex technology, the cluster organization of the supply of intermediate products (modules, units, nodes). It is shown that the separation of the functions of the final integrator contributes to the distribution of risks along the DVCS. At the same time, the attention of the final integrator is concentrated on the development of the final complex products, the organization of the supplier system and after-sales service. The cluster organization of intermediate production opens up the possibility of its diversification and direct access to investment flows, which stimulates the development of production. The authors have developed mechanisms for ensuring the competence of manufacturers to their functional purposes in the central air traffic control system and the organization of a network management system.

1. Abdikeev N. M., Bogachev Yu.S., Bekulova S. R. (2019). Institutional mechanisms for ensuring a scientific and technological breakthrough in the Russian economy. Upravlencheskie nauki = Management Sciences, no. 1, pp. 6–19 (in Russian).

2. Abdikeev N. M., Bogachev Yu.S., Moreva E. L., Teplyakov A.Yu. (2018). Target indicators of improving the competitiveness of manufacturing industries in the Russian Federation. Strategicheskie reshenija i risk-menedzhment = Strategic decisions and risk management, no. 3 (108), pp. 10–15 (in Russian).

3. Ali A., Dadush U. (2011). International Policy Bulletin. Carnegie Endowment. Washington. URL: https://carnegieendowment.org/2011/02/10/rise-oftrade-in-intermediates-policy-implications/458.

4. Bogachev Yu.S., Oktyabrsky A. M., Rubwalter D. A. (2009). Mechanisms of development of innovative economy in modern conditions. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 2 (45), pp. 46–63 (in Russian).

5. Bogdanova M. V., Prikhodchenko M. K. (2017). Analysis of the state and development of the aviation industry of the Russian Federation. Vestnik Universiteta ( Gosudarstvennyj universitet upravlenija) = University Bulletin ( State University of Management), no. 2, pp. 9–13 (in Russian).

6. Dezhina I. (2014). Promising production technologies – new aspects in the development of industry /And. Dezhina, M. Ponomarev. Forsyth = Forsajt, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 2–20 (in Russian).

7. Glazyev S.Yu. (2018). Breakthrough into the future: Russia in new technological and worldwide ways. Moscow, Book World (in Russian).

8. Gornostaev S. A. (2008). Abstract of Cand. brief. “Development of methods and models for planning the activities of the defense concern in the production of civilian products”. Moscow, MSTU. N. E. Bauman, p. 19 (in Russian).

9. Klochkov V. V. (2012). Problems of state financial support for the development of the Russian aviation industry. Audit i finansovyj analiz = Audit and financial analysis, no. 5, pp. 163–172 (in Russian).

10. Moiseichev E., Meshkova T. (2015). Russia in global value-added value chains: in search of an effective strategy. Mosty = Bridges, no. 3, pp. 11–14 (in Russian). URL: https://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/review/Mosty%20June%202015_0.pdf.

11. Stephenson S. (2013). Global value chains: the new reality of international trade. Geneva, Switzerland: ICTSD & WEF. URL: http://e15initiative.org/publications/global-value-chains-the-new-reality-of-international-trade/.

12. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 2009. Guide to Measuring the Information Society. 2nd Edition. Paris: OECD. Retrieved July 08, 2009. URL: http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/25/52/43281062.pdf.

13. Tolmacheva I. V., Kitikar O. V. (2017). Theoretical Foundations of Financial Stabilization of an Enterprise. Molodoj uchenyj Forsyth = Young Scientist, no. 1, pp. 273–276 (in Russian). URL https://moluch.ru/archive/135/37751/.

14. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2013. Industrial Development Report 2013. Sustaining Employment Growth: The Role of Manufacturing and Structural Change. Vienna. URL: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2013-12/UNIDO_IDR_2013_main_report_0.pdf.

15. United Nations Industrial Development Organization, 2015. Industrial Development Report 2016. The Role of Technology and Innovation in Inclusive and Sustainable Industrial Development. Vienna. URL: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2015-12/EBOOK_IDR2016_FULLREPORT_0.pdf.

16. Voznesenskaya A. A. (2015). Aviation industry of the Russian Federation and the need to restructure industrial enterprises. Voprosy jekonomiki i prava = Questions of economics and law, no. 6, pp. 83–86 (in Russian).