Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

Optimization of the Number and Frequency of Repairs

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-2(85)-84-103

Abstract

When managing the production process at an enterprise, it is important to correctly develop a policy for overhauls of machinery and equipment. Usually for this purpose, enterprises use the standards for the repairs frequency recommended in the literature. In publications on the reliability theory, repair policy is considered as an optimization problem. In publications on the theory of reliability, this problem is considered as optimization. In this case, usually the criterion of optimization is some kind of relative indicator, such as availability rate or average operating costs per unit of time. However, such criteria do not fully reflect the economic interests of enterprises – owners of equipment. In a market economy, these enterprises are focused on maximizing their market value. In this paper, we propose to form a repair policy in which the market value of the enterprise, and therefore all its assets, will be most. The corresponding mathematical model is the best use underling the valuation theory. It also takes into account the physical deterioration of machines during their operation, as well as the possibility of random marginal failures, leading to the need to stop using the machine. In this case, the improvement of the technical condition of the machine after its overhaul is described using the Kijima imperfect repair model. The calculations carried with our model allow establishing how the optimal number and timing of repairs depend on such parameters as repair cost and its restoration factor, the rate of physical wear of machines, and the intensity of their resource failures. We show how to use the constructed model to take into account the effect of inflation rates and income and property tax rates on the repair policy.

About the Author

Sergey A. Smolyak
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow


References

1. Andrianov Yu.V. (2006). Vehicle valuation. Moscow, Delo (in Russian)

2. Bartholomew-Biggs M., Christianson B., Zuo M. (2006). Optimizing preventive maintenance models. Computational Optimization and Applications, no. 35 (2), pp. 261–279.

3. California State board of Equalization. (2017). Assessors’ Handbook Section 581. Equipment and Fixtures Index, Percent Good and valuation Factors. URL: http://www.boe.ca.gov/proptaxes/pdf/ah58117.pdf.

4. European Valuation Standards (2016). Eighth edition. TEGoVA.

5. Fedotova M. (ed.). (2018). Valuation of machinery, equipment and vehicles. Moscow, INFRA-M (in Russian).

6. Handbook of the appraiser of machines and equipment. (2015). 1st ed. Nizhny Novgorod, Volga Center for Methodological and Informational Support of Assessment (in Russian).

7. International valuation Standards (2017). International valuation Standards Council.

8. Kijima M. (1989). Some results for repairable systems with general repair. Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 26 (1), pp. 89–122.

9. Kovalyov A.P., Kushel A.A. et al. (2003). Valuation of machinery, equipment and vehicles. Moscow, Interreclama (in Russian).

10. Krivtsov V., Yevkin A. (2014). Comparative analysis of optimal maintenance policies under general repair with underlying Weibull distributions. Power Engineering and Computer Integrated Technologies in AIC, no. 2, pp. 57–64.

11. Mikhaylets V.B. (2007). The formula for value calculating, taking into account curable and incurable physical obsolescence. URL: http://www.ocenchik.ru/docs/465.html (in Russian).

12. Personal Property Depreciation Schedules and Trend Tables (2018). URL: https://mtrevenue.gov/wpcontent/uploads/2018/01/2018-PPR-Deprectiation-Schedules.pdf.

13. Personal Property Manual. URL: https://azdor.gov/sites/default/files/media/PROPERTY_pp-manual.pdf.

14. RICS valuation – Global Standards (2017). London, RICS.

15. Shey-Huei S., Suh-Huey L., Chin-Chih C. (2012). A generalized maintenance policy with age-dependent minimal repair cost for a system subject to shocks under periodic overhaul. International Journal of Systems Science, no. 43 (6), pp. 1007–1013.

16. Smolyak S.A. (2008). Problems and paradoxes of machinery and equipment valuation. Moscow, RIO MAOC (in Russian).

17. Smolyak S.A. (2009). Ergodic models of machine and equipment depreciation. Economics and Mathematical Methods. Vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 42–60 (in Russian).

18. Smolyak S.A. (2014). Overhaul policy optimization and equipment valuation concerning its reliability. Journal of the New Economic Association, vol. 22 (2), pp. 102–131 (in Russian).

19. Smolyak S.A. (2016). Valuation of machinery and equipment (Secrets of the DCF method). Moscow, Option Publishing House (in Russian).

20. Stepanov D.N. (2007). To the definition of physical obsolescence for machinery and equipment. URL: http://www.ocenchik.ru/method/machines/223/ (in Russian).

21. Wang H., Pham H. (2006). Reliability and Optimal Maintenance. London, Springer.

22. Yashchura A.I. (2006). The system of maintenance and repair of general industrial equipment: Handbook. Moscow, NсENAS (in Russian).


Review

For citations:


Smolyak S.A. Optimization of the Number and Frequency of Repairs. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2019;(2):84-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-2(85)-84-103

Views: 722


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)