Theory of Collective Action: Structuring a Collective under Deficit of Trust
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-2(85)-15-35
Abstract
The article examines the possibilities of coordinating action among members in a collective with the aim of maximizing individual gains. Projected aggregate income is assumed to increase as the effort invested by each individual member of the collective increases, subject to the law of decreasing returns. Mathematical analysis is performed using two income functions: one non-specific, used for finding the overall solution, and the other – a specifically formulated, manifest mathematical relationship serving to calculate the results of collective action. It is shown that in order to avoid a balanced (equilibrium) yet inefficient outcome, coordination of respective effort is necessary. Coordination based on mutual trust among all members is capable of attaining optimal outcomes for the collective. Deficit of trust, characteristic of numerous collectives, alongside their members’ desire to maximize individual gains, creates demand for the formation of smaller groups of individuals united by mutual trust. Within each group of this kind, members coordinate their actions, aiming to maximize gains as a group. As a result, members of the group increase their effort above equilibrium levels, thus increasing individual gains for all members of the larger collective. The same effect is produced by an increase in the number of members in any group, as well as formation of new groups out of previously unaffiliated members of the larger collective. In view of decreasing returns and lack of information where value is created collectively, transformation of a uniform collective into a more intricately structured system partially compensates for the lack of social capital, opening the road to increasing the efficiency of collective action.
Keywords
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL): C02; D11
About the Authors
Elena M. SkarzhinskaiaRussian Federation
Kostroma
Vladimir I. Tsurikov
Russian Federation
Kostroma
References
1. Belokrylova O.S., Ermishina A.V. (2012). Factors of collective action (on the example of housing self-organization). Terra Economicus, no. 1, pp. 174–179 (in Russian).
2. Belyanin A.V., Zinchenko V. P. (2010). Trust in the economy and public life. Moscow, Fond «Liberalnaya missiya» (in Russian).
3. Kapelyushnikov R. (2010). The multiplicity of institutional worlds: The Nobel prize in economic sciences 2009: Working paper WP3/2010/02 (Part 1). Moscow, National Research University – Higher School of Economics (in Russian).
4. Nilsson Y., Golovina S., Volodina N. (2008). The impact of trust on the development of agrarian cooperatives. Agrarnyy Vestnik Urala [Agrarian Bulletin of the Urals], no. 8, pp. 11–13 (in Russian).
5. Ostrom E. (2011). Governing the commons. The evolution of collective institutions for collective action. Moscow, IRISEN, Mysl (in Russian).
6. Skarzhinskaya E.M., Tsurikov V.I. (2014). On the issue of the effectiveness of collective action. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal], no. 3, pp. 87–106 (in Russian).
7. Skarzhinskaya E.M., Tsurikov V.I. (2017a). Economicmathematical analysis of the efficiency conditions of the principle “from each according to his ability, to each according to his work”. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoy teorii [Journal of Economic Theory], no. 2, pp. 110–122 (in Russian).
8. Skarzhinskaya E.M., Tsurikov V.I. (2017b). Model of collective action. Part 1: Equilibrium, justice, efficiency. Ekonomika i matematicheskiye metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods], no. 2, pp. 118–133 (in Russian).
9. Skarzhinskaya E.M., Tsurikov V.I. (2017c). Model of collective action. Part 2: The leading coalition. Ekonomika i matematicheskiye metody [Economy and Mathematical Methods], no 4, pp. 89–104 (in Russian).
10. Skorobogatov A. (2007). Organization theory and models of incomplete contracts. Voprosy ekonomiki, no. 12, pp. 71–95 (in Russian).
11. Tirole J. (2000). Markets and market power of the theory of industrial organization (St. Petersburg). Ekonomicheskaya shkola [The school of economics]. In 2 vols. Vol. 1 (in Russian).
12. Fukuyama F. (2004). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. Moscow, AST (in Russian).
13. Furubotn E.G., Richter R. (2005). Institutions and economic theory: The contribution of the new institutional economics. SPb., Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University (in Russian).
14. Hart O.D. (2001). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. Nature of the firm. Moscow, Delo, pp. 206–236 (in Russian).
15. Shastitko A. (2001). Incomplete contracts: Problems of definition and modeling. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 6, pp. 80–99 (in Russian).
16. Abramitsky R. (2011). Lessons from the kibbutz on the equality-incentives trade off. Journal of Economics Perspectives, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 185–208.
17. Grossman S., Hart O. (1986). The cost and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, no. 4, pp. 691–719.
18. Hardin G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, vol. 162, no. 3859, pp. 1243–1248.
19. Hart O., Moore J. (1988). Incomplete contracts and renegotiation. Econometrics, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 755–785.
20. Holmstrom B. (1982). Moral hazard in teams. The Bell Journal of Economics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 324–340.
21. Ménard C. (2004). The economics of hybrid organizations. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, no. 3, pp. 345–376.
22. Ménard C. (2007). Cooperatives: Hierarchies or hybrids? In: Karantininis K., Nilsson J. (eds.). Vertical markets and cooperative hierarchies. The role of cooperatives in the agrifood industry. Dordrecht, Springer, pp. 1–18.
23. Olson M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.
24. Polterovich V. (2017). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Russian Journal of Economics, no. 3, pp. 24–41.
Review
For citations:
Skarzhinskaia E.M., Tsurikov V.I. Theory of Collective Action: Structuring a Collective under Deficit of Trust. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2019;(2):15-35. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-2(85)-15-35