On Some Paradoxes of the Russian Innovation Infrastruct
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-1(84)-49-70
Abstract
This paper analyzes the modern trends in the development of innovation infrastructure (II) in Russia and abroad. An intensive way of development of foreign technology parks is shown, which, acquiring new qualitative features, become centers of innovation at the international level, i.e. they transform to Innovation Centers (IC). The specific features of IC as an institute of innovative economy are marked. The main trend of the development of the Russian innovation infrastructure is shown as an extensive one, relying mainly on a quantitative increase and a partial modernization of the old elements. This is the path generated by contradictions, shortcomings and mistakes in the actions of the state and business. Some paradoxes of the development of the Russian innovation infrastructure are considered: the lack of reliable information about the quantitative configuration of innovation infrastructure, the lack of unified conceptual tools for the system of II elements, effective mechanisms for their interaction, and the innovation’s demand. The main reasons for the emergence of these paradoxes are associated with the lack of a unified (systemic) approach for solving a problems accumulated in the innovation sphere are analyzed. It is shown that the state attempts directed to the development of innovation policy and its financial support, to introduce various mechanisms of interaction between the participants of the innovation process, revive some II elements, as well as the creation of principal new elements, do not bring the expected results. We propose a number of ways for overcoming the existing paradoxes. They include: developing and implementing a single conceptual framework of innovation policy, the state monitoring and reporting system, and linking innovation infrastructure development plans with Federal Strategies and Programs.
About the Authors
Olga A. Andryushkevich
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
Irina M. Denisova
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Moscow
Russian Federation
Moscow
References
1. Andriushkevich O.A., Denisova I.M. (2014). The Formation of Entrepreneurial Universities in Innovative Economy. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (66), pp. 87–104 (in Russian).
2. Andriushkevich O.A., Denisova I.M. (2016). Is it Possible to Have Open Innovations in Russia? Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (74), pp. 65–83 (in Russian).
3. Danilov L.V., Golubkin I.V., Labudin M.A. et al. (2017). The third annual review of «Technoparks of Russia – 2017». Moscow, AKIT, 198 p. URL: http://akitrf.ru/upload/ot211217.pdf (in Russian).
4. Gershman M.A. (2013). Russian engineering organizations: approaches to the identification and evaluation of performance. Voprosy Statistiki, no. 2, pp. 53–62 (in Russian).
5. Gospodderzhka biznesa: na Severnom Kavkaze nachal rabotu eshche odin centr inzhiniringa (2018). 27.04.2018. URL: http://www.enginrussia.ru/news/lenta-novostey/tsentr-inzhiniringa-kabardino-balkariya, 2018 (in Russian).
6. Gorban М., Guriev S., Kostroma L., Fedyukin I., Shapochka E. (2010). Innovative activity of large business in Russia: Mechanisms, barriers, prospects. Rossijskij zhurnal menedzhmenta, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 81–112 (in Russian).
7. Gorodnikova N.V., Gohberg L.M., Ditkovskij K.A. et al. (2018). Indikatory innovacionnoj deyatel'nosti: 2018: Statisticheskij sbornik. Moscow, NIU VSHEH, 320 p. (in Russian).
8. Guidelines for the creation and development of innovation centers (technology and patterns). (2012). Rejtingovoe agentstvo «Ehkspert RA». Innovacionnyj centr «Skolkovo», 144 p. URL: https://raexpert.ru/docbank/b50/6a8/212/969e583e345e 46338630a19.pdf (in Russian).
9. Hobbs K.G., Link A. N., Scott J.T. (2017). Science and technology parks: An annotated and analytical literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 957–976.
10. Kuzyk M., Simachev Yu., Zudin N. (2017). What are the reasons for the weak interaction between science and business in Russia. XVIII April International Academic Conference on Economic and Social Development. Moscow, 11–14 April 2017 (in Russian).
11. Lenchuk E.B. (2016). Technological vector of new industrialization in Russia. Ekonomicheskoe Vozrozhdenie Rossii, no. 2 (48), pp. 26–29 (in Russian).
12. Lenchuk E.B. (2016). The course for new industrialization – a global trend of economic development. Problemy Prognozirovaniya, no. 3 (156), pp. 132–143 (in Russian).
13. Link A. N. (2009). Research, science, and technology parks: An overview of the academic literature? Understanding Research, Science and Technology Parks: Global Best Practice, Report of a Symposium. Washington, The National Academies Press, pp. 127–139.
14. Navigator po inzhiniringu. (2015). Mezhdunarodnyj Centr Inzhiniringa i Innovacij. EnginRussia.Ru. Moscow. URL: http://www.enginrussia.ru/news/lenta-novostey/navigator-po-inzhiniringu-vse-obinzhiniringe-v-rf/ (in Russian).
15. New technological revolution: Challenges and opportunities for Russia (2017). Expert Analytical Re port. Pod nauchnym rukovodstvom V. N. Knyagina. Moscow. Centr strategicheskih razrabotok. 136 p. (in Russian).
16. Os'makova V.S., Pastuhova V.A. (red.) (2015). Inzhiniring i promyshlennyj dizajn – 2015. Moscow, Onebook.ru, 123 p. (in Russian).
17. Piqué J.M. (2016). Areas of innovation in a global world: Concept and practice. Málaga: IASP. Razvitie inzhiniringovyh uslug v Rossii: proshloe, nastoyashchee, budushchee (2011). URL: http://www.mrwolf.ru/Kariera_i_biznes/Pro4ee/8658 (in Russian).
18. Russian economy in 2016. Trends and prospects, 2017. Issue 38. In-t Ekon. Politiki im. E.T. Gajdara. Moscow, Izd-vo In-ta Gajdara. 520 p. URL: https://www.iep.ru/ru/publikatcii/publication/8156.html (in Russian).
19. Russian business: Portrait in numbers. (2015). Report to the President of the Russian Federation – 2015. Prepared by an expert center at the Presidential Commissioner for the Protection of the Rights of Entrepreneurs. 24 p. URL: http://doklad.ombudsmanbiz.ru/pdf/2015_portret.pdf (in Russian).
20. Skolkovo, Innovacionnyj centr TADVISER (2018). URL: http://www.tadviser.ru/index.php/Kompaniya: Skolkovo_Innovacionnyj_centr (in Russian)
21. Sokolov D.S., Tomilina N.S. (2016). Innovative infrastructure in modern Russia: concept, content, features. Mezhdunarodnyj nauchnyj zhurnal «Innovacionnaya Nauka», no. 1, pp. 172–177 (in Russian).
22. Shpilenko A. (2015). Formation of new needs and demand for innovation. Moscow. Minpromtorg Rossii. 15 p. URL: http://minpromtorg.gov.ru/common/upload/files/docs/Gospodderzhka_promparki_klastery_AKT%5B1%5D.pdf (in Russian).
23. Shuklina Z. N. (2015). Formation of new needs and demand for innovation. RISK: Resursy, Informaciya, Snabzhenie, Konkurenciya, no. 2, pp. 76–80 (in Russian).
24. Technoparks of Russia – 15 (2016). Industry Review. Associaciya klasterov i tekhnoparkov Moscow. 67 p. URL: http://www.tp86.ru/upload/medialibrary/0c9/0c9a3387deb6ef9afa5662370474b602.pdf (in Russian).
25. Technoparks of Russia – 16 (2016) Industry Review. Associaciya klasterov i tekhnoparkov. Moscow. Federal Press. 89 p. URL: http://www.akitrf.ru/upload/medialibrary/f8b/f8bb72089499e73fff5a144288b70c01.pdf (in Russian).
26. Yaroslavl Plan (2010). Yaroslavl Plan 10–15–20 “Roadmap” of building an innovative economy: Best international practice and lessons for Russia. New York, The New York Academy of Sciences. August 20. 136 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Andryushkevich O.A., Denisova I.M. On Some Paradoxes of the Russian Innovation Infrastruct. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2019;(1):49-70. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2019-1(84)-49-70
Views:
869
Email this article 