Institutional project for global climate regulation

The climate agenda is beginning to have a significant impact on the economic policies of different countries. We argue that the established global climate regulation can be seen not only as a co-ordinated project of forming new institutions, but also as a competition of separate projects, one of which takes the place of the global one. The aim of our paper is to characterise the institutional project of climate regulation as the result of collective choices to adopt and implement measures to internalise the global externalities of climate change. We conducted an institutional analysis of the selection of the main directions and instruments of climate regulation, and highlighted the criteria for this selection. The article shows that in the process of coordination of interests the choice is determined by the correlation of political and economic positions of different interest groups (international organisations, countries, corporations and banks, their associations), and the interests of increasing competitiveness and strengthening control and power in the modern economy come to the fore. As a result, the low-carbon economy project is taking the place of the global climate regulation project. Its core is the energy transition, which involves replacing fossil fuels with renewable energy sources. The low carbon economy project is supported by the narratives of impending disaster, the «Net-Zero» and «Race to Zero campaign». Its main beneficiaries are developed countries as developers and suppliers of relevant technological and management solutions. The financial sector gets its share of benefits. M. Olson's formula «the majority tyrannizes and exploits the minority» is realized. We show that «distribution coalitions», when given additional resources, are willing to continue investing them in collective action to promote a low-carbon economy. We conclude that getting global climate regulation out of the «race to zero» trap involves the development of sovereign climate policies by different countries and groups of countries. These policies do not focus on following specific low-carbon development recommendations, but rather on their own socio-economic development with a view to reducing their impact on the climate system.

1. Bobylev S. N. (2017). Sustainable development: a paradigm for the future. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 107–113 (in Russian).

2. Davydov V. M. (2021). Imperatives of sustainable development in the shadow and in the light of the pandemic. World Economy and International Relations, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 11–22 (in Russian).

3. Danilov-Danilyan V.I., Kattsov V. M., Porfiriev B. N. (2020). The problem of climate change – ​the field of convergence and interaction of natural and socio-humanitarian sciences. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 90, no. 10, pp. 914–925 (in Russian).

4. Kurbatova M. V., Pyzhev A. I. (2023). The low-carbon economy as an institutional project: Challenges and objectives. Journal of Institutional Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 6–23 (in Russian).

5. Olson M. (1996). The logic of collective action. Public goods and the theory of groups. Moscow: Fund for economic initiative (in Russian).

6. Olson M. (1998). The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities. Novosibirsk, EKOR (in Russian).

7. Porfiriev B. N. (2019). Economic dimensions of the climate change challenge for sustainable development in Russia. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 400–407. (In Russian).

8. Pyzhev A. I. (2022). No one has cancelled the climate agenda: Why is it important for the Russian economy? ЕСО Journal, no. 7, pp. 31–50 (in Russian.)

9. Thaler R., Sunstein C. (2017). Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Farber (in Russian).

10. Schwab Kl. (2022). Stakeholder capitalism. A global economy that works for progress, people and planet. Moscow: Eksmo (in Russian).

11. Centre for Strategic Research (2021). Russia's Climate Agenda: Responding to International Challenges (in Russian). URL: https://www.csr.ru/upload/iblock/521/521091011093dc8b5ece74cdd8552680.pdf

12. Carney M. (2015). Breaking the Tragedy of the Horizon – ​Climate Change and Financial Stability. Speech at Lloyd’s of London. London, 29 September 2015. URL: https://www.bis.org/review/r151009a.pdf

13. Cole D. (2015). Advantages of a Polycentric Approach to Climate Change Policy. Articles by Maurer Faculty. 1415. URL: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/1415

14. Giddens A. (2008). The politics of climate change. National responses to the challenge of global warming. September. URL: www.policy-network.net https://fcampalans.cat/images/noticias/The_politics_of_climate_change_Anthony_Giddens%282%29.pdf

15. Ostrom E. (2014). Polycentric Approach for Coping with Climate Change. Annals of Economics and Finance, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 97–134.

16. Nordhaus W. (2019). Climate Change: The Ultimate Challenge for Economics. American Economic Review, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 1991–2014.

17. The Global Risks Report 2023. 18th Edition. Insight report. WEF, 2023. URL: https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2023.pdf

18. The green swan: central banking and financial stability in the age of climate change. BIS. January 2020. URL: https://www.bis.org/events/green_swan_2021/overview.htm

19. The green swan 2021: coordinating finance on climate. Conference volume. BIS. August 2022. URL: https://www.bis.org/events/green_swan_2021/overview.htm

20. The net-zero transition: What it would cost, what it could bring. McKinsey. January 2022. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/sustainability/our%20insights/the%20net%20zero%20transition%20what%20it%20would%20cost%20what%20it%20could%20bring/the-net-zero-transition-what-it-would-cost-and-what-it-could-bring-final.pdf