Why it’s time to talk about noonomics as a possible new development model?

The birth of the theory of noonomics was a reflection of the community of economists and its bright representative S. D. Bodrunov on the need for a systematic anthropological understanding of the boundaries of the capitalist arrangement of the world, the limits of the market economy in the coevolution of Nature and Society. The processes of information technology progress, the inconsistency of the globalization of the world order, the growth of social conflicts and environmental problems are accompanied by an increase in anthropological catastrophes. The purpose of the article is to consider the conceptual goals of the theory of noonomics to the world of variability and multiplicity of ideas of its transformation. Conclusions about the use of noonomics in the referential logic of decision-making can serve as a theoretical basis for the clash of subjective interests, currently limited only by «pluralism of opinions» in assessing possible ways of development of the country. The theory of noonomics by S. D. Bodrunov is valuable for us today because it is an approach with fuzzy control that is replicated by our ability to change the model of development of society beyond the limits of classical political economy. Externally, the fuzzy logic of the theory of noonomics, when carefully immersed in its content, suddenly acquires the features of a control system with a mind (R. Golunov's expression) on the ruins of the familiar world (Andrey Fursov). We specifically use the terms of scientists who have not yet entered the thesaurus of geopolitics and are different from the products of «zombie-box». It is the acute understanding of the need to destroy the established word flow of «blind guides» that distinguishes the ideas of S. D. Bodrunov, which are the structure of the theory of noonomics in its socio-cultural plan. Noonomics seems to indicate changes in the content of the fundamental foundations of higher education.

1. Averyanov L.Ya. (2003). In search of his idea. Articles and essays. Part Two. Moscow: Russian Humanitarian Internet University. 296 p. (in Russian).

2. Blaug M. (2004). Methodology of economic science, or how economists explain. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7, pp. 63–91 (in Russian).

3. Bodrunov S. D. (2018a). Noonomika. Moscow: Cultural Revolution. 432 p. (in Russian).

4. Bodrunov S. D. (2018b). From ZOO to ZOO: man, society and production in the context of a new technological revolution. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 7, pp. 109–118 (in Russian).

5. Bodrunov S. D. (2020). Noonomics: the trajectory of global transformation: monograph. Moscow: INIR; Cultural Revolution. 224 p. (in Russian).

6. Bodrunov S. D. (2021a). Engels and the XXI century: conceptualizing the future. Questions of Political Economy, no. 1 (25), pp. 22–29 (in Russian).

7. Bodrunov S. D. (2021b). What is noonomics? A(O)nthology of noonomics: the Fourth Technological revolution and its economic, social and humanitarian consequences. Under the general editorship of S. D. Bodrunova. St. Petersburg: INIR, pp. 19–92 (in Russian).

8. Bodrunov S. D. (2021c). From Homo economicus to Homo sapiens. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 12, pp. 18–31 (in Russian).

9. Bodrunov S. D. (2022a). Scientific and technological progress and the transformation of society: noonomics and noosociety. Part 1. Moscow: Almanac of works of INIR n. a. S. Y. Vitte. Vol. 1, no, 1, pp. 24–42 (in Russian).

10. Bodrunov S. D. (2022b). Scientific and technological progress and the transformation of society: noonomics and no society. Part 2. Noonomics and noosociety. Almanac of works of the INIR n. a. S. Y. Vitte. Vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 13–35 (in Russian).

11. Bodrunov S. D., Desan R., Freeman A. (2022). Beyond the Global crisis: noonomics, creativity, geopolitics. St. Petersburg: INIR n. a. S. Y. Vitte. 168 p. (in Russian).

12. Herzen A. I. (1997). Aesthetics. Criticism. Problems of culture. Moscow: Iskusstvo (Art). 603 p. (in Russian).

13. Glazyev S.Yu. (2022a). Noonomics as a core of the formation of a new technological and world economic order. Noonomics and noosociety. Moscow: Almanac of works of INIR n. a. S. Y. Vitte. Vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–64 (in Russian).

14. Glazyev S.Yu. (2022b). Noospheric socialism. How to build a development state. Zavtra (Tomorrow), no. 5, p. 5 (in Russian).

15. Grinberg R. S. (2020). The world and Russia in search of a new model of economic development. Moscow: Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia. Vol. 223, pp. 70–74 (in Russian).

16. Kugel Ye. (2015). Aphorisms, quotations, phrases and statements (in Russian). URL: https://aphorism.ru/authors/erakhmil-kugel.html?ysclid=li320owhy4765146896

17. Marx K. (1969). Economic manuscripts of 1857–1859. Marx K., Engels F. Coll. works. Vol. 46. Ch. II. Moscow: Politizdat. 618 p. (in Russian).

18. The new industrial society: origins, reality, the future (2019). Noonomics. I vol.: Selected materials of seminars, publications and events of the Institute of New Industrial Development (INIR) n. a. S. Y. Vitte on the topic of the concept of a new industrial society of the second generation and the new industrial development of society. Under the general editorship of S. D. Bodrunova. Collection of scientific works. St. Petersburg: INIR n. a. S. Y. Vitte. 664 p. (in Russian).

19. Porokhovsky A. A. (2016). Political economy in the XXI century: a systematic approach to solving the problems of the modern economy. Questions of Political Economy, no. 4, pp. 8–22 (in Russian).

20. Transforming Our World (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development General Assembly resolution 70/1 of 25 September 2015. (in Russian). URL: https://undoes.org/ruZA/RES/70/1

21. Rabosh V. A., Strelchenko V. I. (2023). Human Philosophy in the Experience of Metaphysical Gnosis and Educational Institutionalization. Higher education in the modern world: history and prospects: Collection of scientific papers. Vol. 2. Comp., ed. Bakhtin M. V., Sokolovskaya I. E. Moscow: Encyclopedist-Maximum, pp. 42–46 (in Russian).

22. Ruzavin G. I. (2005). Methodology of epistemology. Moscow: UNITY-Dar. 311 p. (in Russian).

23. Serebrovskaya K. B. (1994). The essence of life: history of the search. Moscow: [no name]. 400 p. (in Russian). URL: https://rusneb.ru/catalog/000199_000009_001679205/

24. Subetto A. I. (2019). Manifesto of Noospheric Socialism. St. Petersburg: Asterion. 67 p. (in Russian).

25. Treshchevsky Yu.I., Treshchevskaya N.Yu. (2008). The use of reverse abduction for the nomination and verification of management hypotheses. Bulletin of the Voronezh SU. Series: Economics and Management, no. 2, pp. 56–59 (in Russian).

26. Chekmarev V. V., Chekmarev V. V., Shvets A. F. (2020). Positivism, constructivism, structuralism, diglossia as complementary principles of analysis of the modern economy. Economics as an object of interdisciplinary research: a collection of materials of the IV International Political Economy Congress (IPEC–IV). Gen. ed. Bodrunov S. D., Buzgalin A. V. Moscow: Cultural Revolution, pp. 347–359 (in Russian).

27. Chekmarev V. V. (2020). At the edge of the unknown. Noospheric paradigm of Russian studies, Eurasianism and sustainable development as the basis for the formation of noospheric education and upbringing in Russia of the XXI century. St. Petersburg: Asterion, pp. 136–445 (in Russian).

28. Chekmarev V.V., Shvets A. F. (2020). Noonomics: in search of lost Time. Scientific works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, vol. 224, no. 4, pp. 311–323 (in Russian).

29. Chekmarev V. V. (2022). Noonomics: Hypothesis becomes theory. Noospheric Research, no. 1, pp. 5–11 (in Russian).

30. Noskov V. A., Chekmarev V. V. (2020). Political economy assessment of the education system promotion in Russia in the conditions of digital economy formation. Advances in Intelligent System and Computing, no. 908, pp. 518–528.