Application of the New Resource Approach to the Study of the Parameters of the Industrialization Economy

The processes of industrialization, reindustrialization and new industrialization differ not only in the content and mechanisms of implementation, but also in the set of resources required for their application. New industrialization as a process of quantitative and qualitative changes in the economy is based on a complex of resources. These resources are necessary, on the one hand, for the modernization of traditional industries, and on the other hand, for the formation of promising economic activities and industries. Keeping a balance between the resources used to achieve the goals of modernization and innovative development in order to achieve the goals of modernization and innovative development is one of the tasks of a methodological nature and requires the development of appropriate theoretical approaches and models. At the same time, the second most important task is the application of such theories and concepts that will provide a solution to the problems associated with the identification, assessment and description of the parametric characteristics and functions of resources in the system of industrial development of the domestic economy. To solve these problems, the article highlights the features of new industrialization; its differences from such phenomena as industrialization, deindustrialization and reindustrialization. It is substantiated that the use of the resource concept as a methodological basis for new industrialization will make it possible to determine the following: to draw up a typology of the resources of new industrialization; identify criteria for strategic and complementary resources of new industrialization; to identify the subjects of relations in the resource allocation system, as well as their specific functions. The article concludes that modernization processes are provided mainly by massive resources and complementary capabilities and competencies, while the processes of innovative and technological development within the framework of the new industrialization of the economy presuppose the presence of strategic, unique resources and competencies.

1. Bell D. (2004). The coming post-industrial society. The experience of social forecasting. Transl. from English. 2nd ed., corr. and add. Moscow: Academia. CLXX. 788 p. (in Russian).

2. Gubanov S. (2008). Neoindustrialization plus vertical integration (on the formula for the development of Russia). Economist, no. 9 (in Russian).

3. Katalevskiy D.Yu. (2008). Evolution of strategic management concepts: from the Harvard School of the Environment to a resource-based approach to management. Public Administration. Electronic newsletter, iss. 16 (in Russian).

4. Kat’kalo V.S. (2002). The resource concept of strategic management: the genesis of the main ideas and concepts. Saint Petersburg University Bulletin, issue 8, no. 4(32), pp. 20–28 (in Russian).

5. Kleyner G. B. (2015). Reindustrialization, residentization, re-institutionalization are the key tasks of Russia’s economic revival. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 4 (46), pp. 34–39 (in Russian).

6. Kleyner G. B. (2011). Resource theory of the systemic organization of the economy. Russian Management Journal, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 3–28 (in Russian).

7. Lazarev V. V. (2001). Theory of state and law. 3rd ed., reprint. and additional. Moscow: Yurist’. 520 p. (in Russian).

8. Lenchuk E. B. (2016). Course towards new industrialization – ​a global trend of economic development. Problems of Forecasting, no. 3, pp. 132–134 (in Russian).

9. Rozmainskiy I.V., Kholodilin K.A. (2012). A History of Economic Analysis in the West. St. Petersburg: NRU HSE. 209 p. (in Russian).

10. Rumyantsev A. M. (1975). Economic encyclopedia. Political Economy. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia, vol. 2. 560 p. (in Russian).

11. Sukharev O. S. (2014). Reindustrialization of the economy and technological development. Economic Policy, no. 2 (in Russian).

12. Tatarkin A. I. (2015). New industrialization of the Russian economy: the need for development and / or challenges of the time. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 2 (44), pp. 20–31 (in Russian).

13. Toffler E. (2004). Metamorphoses of power. Knowledge, wealth and power on the threshold of the XXI century. Moscow, ACT (in Russian).

14. Shumpeter I. A. (2008). Economic development theory. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Moscow. Eksmo, 864 p. (in Russian).

15. Amit R., Schoemaker P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14 (1), pp. 33–46.

16. Blackler F., Duguid P. (1995). Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and interpretation. Organization Studies, no. 16 (6), pp. 1021–1046.

17. Bontis N. (1999). Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field. International Journal of Technology Management, no. 18 (5–8), p. 433.

18. Borch O.J., Madsen E. L. (2007). Dynamic capabilities facilitating innovative strategies in SMEs. Int. J. Technoentrepreneurship, no. 1, p. 109.

19. Edvinsson L., Malone M. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York, Harper Collins.

20. Grant R. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategic formulation. California Management Review, no. 33 (3), pp. 114–135.

21. Grant R., Montgomery C. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategic formulation. California Management Review, no. 33 (3), pp. 118–135.

22. Helfat C.E., Martin J.A. (2015). Dynamic managerial capabilities: Review and assessment of managerial impact on strategic change. Journal of Management, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 1281–1312.

23. Hudson W. (1993). Intellectual Capital: How to build it, enhance it, use it. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

24. Razvadovskaya Y., Kapluk E., Rudneva K. (2019). Assessment of the potential of dynamic capabilities of companies in the mining sector. 19th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 79–86.

25. Roos G., Roos J. (1997). Measuring your company’s intellectual performance. Long Range Planning, no. 30 (3), pp. 413–426.

26. Spender J.C. (1998). Pluralist epistemology and the knowledge-based theory of the firm. Organization, no. 5 (2), pp. 233–256.

27. Stewart W. H. Jr., Watson W. E., Carland J. C., Carland J. W. (1999). A proclivity for entrepreneurship: a comparison of entrepreneurs, small business owners, and corporate managers. J. Bus. Venture, no. 14 (2), pp. 189–214.

28. Storey J. (1995). HRM: still marching on, or marching out? In: Storey, J. (Ed.) Human Resource Management: A Critical Text. London, Routledge.

29. Teece D.J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoun-dations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1319–1350.

30. Wernerfelt B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, no. 5, pp. 171–180.

31. Wright P.M., McMahan G.C., McWilliams A. (1994). Human Resources and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective. International Journal of Human Resource Management, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 301–326.

32. United Nations Industrial Development Organization (2019). Bracing for the New Industrial Revolution: Elements of a Strategic Response. Vienna.