Opposition of Civilizations and the Role of State in the Era of Multipolar World
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-1(92)-77-96
Abstract
To study long-term socio-economic processes and the factors that determine them, two methods, two approaches are usually used at the present time: the theory of the cyclic change of world economic structures (WES) and the theory of the evolution of civilizations. In the theory of civilizations, attention is focused mainly on the factors that have the most long – term impact on economic and social processes, namely, on value-sense factors and the principles of the structure of society. The current spiritual, ideological, and geopolitical opposition – the confrontation between the American-style approach to globalization and the multipolar world (MPW) – can be seen as the most important engine and threat to historical development. The purpose of the article is to describe this confrontation in the language of the theory of civilizations. The article describes the civilizational turning point, the transformation of Christian Western Europe into the civilization of the capitalist West. The main task of this transformation was to eliminate all the traditional highest senses and ethical restrictions for the domination of the capital accumulation attitude and the ideology of individualistic liberalism. The article presents some features of the MPW that allow us to consider it (along with the concept of transition to a new, integral WES) as an emerging new civilization, an alternative to the civilization of the West. The leaders of the development of the new civilization are Russia and China. In these civilizations, the most important sense center is the state. In Russia, the focus on perfecting and heightening the status of the state can largely compensate for the decline of spiritual and ideological factors. This article is a continuation of the articles (Volkonsky, 2018; Volkonsky, Gavrilets, Kudrov, 2020).
Keywords
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL): А11, А13, B31
About the Author
Victor A. VolkonskyRussian Federation
References
1. Anpilogov A. (2019). The demise of empires. Chance, fate, or bad luck? The collapse of the Unipolar world. Moscow, Izborsky Club, Book World. 512 p. (in Russian).
2. Arrighi G. (2006). The Long twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Time. Transl. from English by A. Smirnov and N. Edelman. Moscow, Territory of the Future (in Russian).
3. Braudel F. (1992). Material civilization, economy and capitalism, XV–XVIII centuries. In 3 vols. Vol. 3. World time. Moscow, Progress (in Russian).
4. Vasiliev L. S. (1977). The Emergence and formation of the Chinese state. China: History, Culture and Historiography. Moscow, Nauka (in Russian).
5. Volkonsky V. A. (2002). The drama of spiritual history. Non-economic foundations of the economic crisis. Moscow, Nauka. 263 p. (in Russian).
6. Volkonsky V. A. (2008). The Meaning of Life and History. Moscow, Kazan, Altay-TAU (in Russian).
7. Volkonsky V. A. (2015). A multipolar world. Ideology and Economics. Moscow, Knizhny mir. 384 p. (in Russian).
8. Volkonsky V. A. (2017). Twenty-first century. A multipolar world. Trends and tasks of the history. (“Collection of the Izborsky Club”). Moscow, Book World. 320 p. (in Russian).
9. Volkonsky V. A. (2018). Semantic attitudes and their role in history. The Genesis of Capitalism. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (82), pp. 142–156 (in Russian).
10. Volkonsky V. A. (2020). Peculiarities of economic development and the role of the state in modern Russia. Problems of Forecasting, no. 2 (in Russian).
11. Volkonsky V. A., Gavrilets Yu.N., Kudrov A. V. (2020). Liberalism and the State: Economic growth and inequality. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 2 (89), pp. 147–159 (in Russian). DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2020-2(89)-147-159
12. Glazyev S.Yu. (2016). World economic structures in global economic development. Economics and Mathematical methods, no. 2 (in Russian).
13. Glazyev S. (2017). The battle for leadership in the twenty-first century. Russia – USA – China. Seven options for the foreseeable future. Moscow: Book World. 352 p. (in Russian).
14. Denikin A. I. (1990). Essays on the Russian Troubles. Voprosy Istorii, no. 8 (in Russian).
15. Dzhemal G. (2004). Liberation of Islam. Moscow, UMMA (in Russian).
16. Dugin A. (2020а). Horizons of a multipolar world. Tomorrow, no. 8 (in Russian).
17. Dugin A. G. (2020b). Politica Aeterna. Political Platonism and “Black Enlightenment”. Moscow, Academic Project. 563 p. (in Russian).
18. Katasonov V.Yu. (2013). Capitalism. History and ideology of “monetary civilization”. Moscow, Institute of Russian Civilization (in Russian).
19. Kozhinov V. V. (2016). The black hundreds and the Revolution. Moscow, Algorithm (in Russian).
20. Machiavelli N. (1982). The Emperor. Moscow, Khudozhestvennaya Literatura (in Russian).
21. Osipov Yu.M. (2000). Economic civilization and scientific economy. Economic theory on the eve of the XXI century. Moscow, Lawyer (in Russian).
22. Sergeitsev T., Kulikov D., Mostovoy P. (2020). The ideology of Russian Statehood. The continent of Russia. St. Petersburg, Peter. 688 p. (in Russian).
23. Tsagolov G. N. (2012). Why everything is not so. Moscow, Economy (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Volkonsky V.A. Opposition of Civilizations and the Role of State in the Era of Multipolar World. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2021;(1):77-96. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2021-1(92)-77-96