State and Institutions: Education as a Product and Generator of Economic Change
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-3(90)-143-150
Abstract
The author analyzes the discussion on the problems of the genesis and the role of institutions in economic development and shows that, in particular, in the discussion of supporters of “paninstitutionalism”, “ideational approach” and “critical Marxism” its participants do not take into account the dialectical nature of the connection between the development of economic relations, institutions and ideas. The interaction between them includes not only direct, but also reverse, mutual influences. The latter, in fact, determine that ideas have a certain opposite effect on the formation of institutions, but only when they penetrate the consciousness of economic actors capable of carrying out institutional changes. Education as an integral part of culture plays an important role in this process. This role of education becomes even more significant in the context of the creative revolution, when the main factor in the development of the economy is the creative potential of a person.
About the Author
Natalya G. Yakovleva
Institute of Economics Russian Academy of Sciences;
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Auzan A. A. (2015). Path dependence problem: the evolution of approaches. Moscow University Economics Bulletin. Series 6, no. 1, pp. 3–17 (in Russian).
2. Bodrunov S. D. (2018). Noonomika. Monography. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya. 432 p. (in Russian).
3. Buzgalin A. V. (2018). Late capitalism and its limits: dialectics of productive forces and production relations. Issues of Political Economy, no. 1, pp. 10–39 (in Russian).
4. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2019а). Economic development as a change of qualitatively different systems of social and economic relations: To a critique of “pan-institutionalism” and “ideational” approach. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 10, pp. 99–114 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-10-99-114.
5. Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2019б). Social structure transformation of late capitalism: from proletariat and bourgeoisie towards precariat and creative class? Sociological Studies, no. 26, pp. 18–28 (in Russian). DOI: 10.31857/S013216250003744-1.
6. Bulavka-Buzgalina L.A. (2014). Culture as an ontological imperative: reloading. Development and Economic, June, p. 134–147 (in Russian).
7. Voeykov M. I. (2018). State as a subject of political and economic studies. Issues of Political Economy, no. 1, pp. 35–55 (in Russian).
8. Hegel G. V.F. (1992). The Phenomenology of Spirit. Saint Petersburg, Nauka. 442 p. (in Russian).
9. Glazev S.Yu. (2019). Priorities of the Russian economy’s accelerated development during the transition to a new technological model. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 2. pp. 17–24 (in Russian).
10. Galbraith: the return (2017). Monograph. Moscow, Kul'turnaya revolyutsiya. 424 p. (in Russian).
11. Ilyenkov E. V. (1991). Philosophy and culture. Moscow, Politizdat. 464 p. (in Russian).
12. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2019a). Contra pan-institutionalism. Part I. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 7, pp. 119–146 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-7-119-146.
13. Kapeliushnikov R. I. (2019b). Contra pan-institutionalism. Part II. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 98–126 (in Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2019-8-98-126.
14. Likhachev D. S. (2006). Culture as a holistic environment. Selected works on Russian and world culture. Saint Petersburg, SPSUM (in Russian).
15. Lunacharsky A. V. (1967). Still to the question of culture. Collected works. Vol. 7 (first published in “Herald of All-Russian Central Executive Commission”, 1922, no. 249, November 3). Moscow: Khudozestvennija Literature (in Russian).
16. Mironov V. V. (2019). “My optimism is restrained”: about philosophy, education and man in modern Russian culture. Concept: philosophy, religion, culture, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 9–26 (in Russian).
17. Muzychuk V. Y. (2017). State paternalism in the sphere of culture: what is wrong with the attitudes of the «patera» in Russia? Scientific report. Moscow, Institute of Economics RAS. 67 p. (in Russian).
18. Muzychuk V. Y. (2018). The sphere of culture and the results of cultural activities in the context of the political economy approach. Issues of Political Economy, no. 4, pp. 91–104 (in Russian).
19. Smolin O. N. (2014). Education – for everybody: Philosophy. Economy. Policy. Legislation. 2nd rev. & exten. Moscow, IKP “Аkadem-kniga”. 1120 p. (in Russian).
20. Schwab K. (2017). The Fourth industrial revolution. Monograph: trans. from Engl. Moscow, “E”. 432 p. (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Yakovleva N.G. State and Institutions: Education as a Product and Generator of Economic Change. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2020;(3):143-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2020-3(90)-143-150
Views:
730
Email this article 