The Idea of Noosphere in the Сontext of Modern Transformations

The idea of a noosphere for the first time formulated in V. Vernadsky's works in the 1940s in the recent years attracts attention of participants of the different trends of scientific search as it has the considerable hidden potential in a research of modern transformations. The creator of a noosphere – the Humanity, presented as the powerful geological force allocated with consciousness, getting to know and transforming the Nature itself is involved in deep transformations many results of which are unexpected for him and bring him problems and additional obligations. Effective implementation of informative opportunities of the idea of a noosphere assumes expansion of space of scientific search and overcoming cross-disciplinary borders. At the focus of research of authors: representation of a noosphere as the system endowed with the energy which generate other types of energy and involved in the difficult process of transformation of energy proceeding in space; structure of a noosphere and its basic components; a problem of responsibility of the Humanity in all its subject forms by results of activity, including, responsibility in its noosphere scale, creation of adequate mechanisms of implementation of such responsibility in the conditions of forming of the global market. The chimeric entities and the anti-systems accompanying them arise in the movement of a noosphere. Through the optics of the idea of a noosphere authors consider key problem nodes and contradictions of modern conversions, estimate the effects arising at the different levels of these processes, offer applied means for a solution of the tasks rising here. Article provides recommendations on upgrading the state policy in social and economic transformations. The authors’ results belong to one of the new and perspective directions of cross-disciplinary scientific search that causes essential novelty and the debatable nature of the provisions presented in article, conclusions and recommendations. During the research heuristic resources of a number of modern scientific theories were used: biospheres, passionarity, cognitive economy, social and economic transformations, human capital, ecology, etc.

system, noosphere, biosphere, embedding, energy, passionarity, scenarios, development, transformations, economy, chimera

1. Arrighi G. (2006). Long twentieth century: Money, power and sources of our time. Moscow: Territory of the Future Publishing house. 472 p. (in Russian).

2. Bantskhaf H. (2009). Mysteries of character. Saint Petersburg, Ves’, 272 p. (in Russian).

3. Bodrunov S. D. (2014). Russian economic system: Future of modern hi-tech production. Economic revival of Russia, no. 2 (40), рр. 5–16 (in Russian).

4. Brizhak O. V., Ermolenko A. A. (2017). Concept of conformism: new opportunities in a research of transformation of the economic relations. Terra Economicus, vol. 15, no. 3, рр. 92–106 (in Russian).

5. Vernadsky V. I. (1989). Biosphere and noosphere. Moscow: Science. 261 p. (in Russian).

6. Galbraith J. K. (1976). Economic theory and purposes of society. Moscow: Progress. 408 p. (in Russian).

7. Glazyev S.Yu. (2015). Forming of a new institutional system in conditions of change of the dominating technological ways. Scientific works of Free economic society of Russia, no. 1, vol. 190, pp. 37–45 (in Russian).

8. Gumilev L. N. (2015). End and again beginning. Moscow, Ayres Press. 384 p. (in Russian).

9. Danilin A. G. (2008). Break in genius. Moscow: Vershina. 375 p. (in Russian).

10. Ermolenko A. A. (2017). Concept of an anti-system of a research of results of the YuZGU social and economic conversions. News, vol. 21, no. 4 (73), рр. 118–128 (in Russian).

11. Kleiner G. B. (2017). From economy of “natural persons” to system economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, рр. 13–24 (in Russian).

12. Mamedov O.Yu. (2017). Economy of an inclusive civilization. Terra Economicus, vol. 15, no. 3, рр. 6–18 (in Russian).

13. Marks K. (1969). Kapital. Vol. 1. Marks K., Engel’s F. Works., 2nd ed. Vol. 23. Moscow, Politizdat, рр. 455–473 (in Russian).

14. Nureev R. M. (2014). Periphery of the world economy. Terra Economicus, vol. 12, no. 1, рр. 123–149 (in Russian).

15. Platon (1992). State. Collected works. In  4 v. Vol. 3 (Philosophical Heritage series). Moscow, Mysl', 656 p. (in Russian).

16. Sviridov P. V. (2000). Myth of an era of Aquarius. Moscow, PRESS, 254 p. (in Russian).

17. Rozanov Yu.A. (1995). Random fields and stochastic partial differential equations. Moscow, Nauka, 256 p. (in Russian).

18. Ryazanov V.T (2016). (Not) real capitalism. Political economy of crisis and its effect for the world economy and Russia. Moscow, Ekonomika, рр. 54–68 (in Russian).

19. Torchinova O. V., Ermolenko A. A. (2015). A phenomenon of social responsibility in the conditions of development of integration processes. Krasnodar, Publishing house of the Southern institute of management, 278 p.

20. Commission on Growth and Development. The Growth Report: Strategies for Sustained Growth. 2015. URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/6507/449860PUB0Box3101OFFICIAL0USE0ONLY1.pdf.

21. Fog A. (2013). Towards a universal theory of competition and selection. Technical University of Denmark, July 4. URL: http://www.agner.org/cultsel/universal_competition_theory. pdf.

22. Hayek F. Individualism and economic order. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012. 280 p.

23. Jacobs M., Mazzucato M. (ed.) (2016). Rethinking capitalism: Economics and policy for sustainable and inclusive growth. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 224 p.

24. Kaplan R.S., Norton D.P. (2001). The strategy focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive. Harvard: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 1–19.

25. Krugman P. (2017). On Economic arrogance. The New York Times. 20.02.

26. Leibenstein H. (1976). Beyond economic man: A new foundation for microeconomics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 297 p.

27. Mises L. (1966). Human action: A treatise on economics. 3 ed. Chicago: Contemporary Books Inc., 256 p.

28. Roubini N. (2015). The unconventional truth. Project Syndicate, 03.02, pp. 8–14.

29. Sartre J.-P. (1960). Critique de la Raison dialectique. Paris, UdS, 761 p.

30. Weber М. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology, vol. 1. Berkely, University California Press, 1469 p.