ECONOMIC RISK OF DEVELOPMENT OF THE TERRITORIES OF ADVANCED SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT

The Russian economy needs a qualitative leap in the rate of economic development. The peculiarity of Russia development is the functioning of municipalities and entire regions with a single industry specialization of the economy. In the context of macroeconomic instability, the above-mentioned territories need preventive support. The instrument of such support since 2015 has been the territories of advanced social and economic development, initially created in the Far East, and since 2016 in single-industry towns. Purpose of the research is to identify and analyze the risk phenomenon of deviations from the goal of socio-economic development of territorial economic entities that have received the status of TASED resident. The city of Naberezhnye Chelny was chosen as the object of study as the first monoterritory with the status of TASED. The objectives of the research work are to detail the essential characteristics of TASED their actualization in the context of the identified problems. The relevance of creating TASED in cities with a single industry economy is determined, the importance of TASED as a zone of favorable economic activity and the emergence of growth points, as well as an institution for the development of the economy of territorial entities, is emphasized. The advantages of TASED as a certain type of territorial formations for residents of TASED are substantiated, and, on the other hand, possible risk factors of deviations from the development goal of TASED are identified and the directions of the search for anti-risk management decisions are identified. In the process of writing, general scientific methods of theoretical and empirical knowledge were used: the method of scientific abstraction, the method of analogies, the logical method, methods of analysis and synthesis, the method of formalization, the method of classification, system, statistical, structural, functional, economic analysis.

1. Chimitova S.Zh., Lihacheva V. V. (2016). Problems and prospects of development of territories of advanced development. Sovremennye tendencii v ekonomike i upravlenii: novyj vzglyad [ Modern Trends in Economics and Management: A New View], no. 39–1, pp. 62–67 (in Russian).

2. Ablizina N. N. (2017). Disadvantages and advantages of TOSER in conditions of economic crisis in single-industry towns. Territories of advanced socio-economic development: theory and practice: materials of the first all-Russian scientificpractical conference, March 2, 2017, pp. 9–13 (in Russian).

3. Andreeva M. (2016). TOSER in Naberezhnye Chelny: “We need the support of all Tatarstan” [Electronic resource]. URL: http://kazan-news.net/economy/2016/04/07/93520.html (in Russian).

4. Apel' A. (2003). Cashing and offshore business schemes. SPb.: Piter, p. 119 (in Russian).

5. Bandurina N. V. (2015). On the issue of creation and development of territories of advanced socio-economic development in modern conditions. Gosudarstvennyj audit. Pravo. Ekonomika [State audit. Right. Economy], no. 4, pp. 99–104 (in Russian).

6. Burdakova G. I. (2016). Development of innovative entrepreneurship in the territory of advanced development on the basis of higher education. Innovative economy and industrial policy of the region (ECOPROM‑2016) proceedings of the international scientific and practical conference, pp. 271–280 (in Russian).

7. Ziyatdinov A. F. (2017). Tax advantages of residents of the territory of advanced socio-economic development. Territories of advanced socio-economic development: theory and practice: Materials of the first all-Russian scientific-practical conference, March 2, 2017, pp. 134–139 (in Russian).

8. Kachalov R. M. (2012). Management of economic risk: theoretical foundations and applications. St. Petersburg, Nestor-Istoriya, 288 p. (in Russian).

9. Kirillova T. V. (2014). Special economic zones in the Russian Federation. Ekonomika i pravo. Sovremennaya nauka: Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki. [Economics and law. Modern science: Actual problems of theory and practice], no. 12, p. 12 (in Russian).

10. Klyajn N. (2002). No Logo. People against brands [Electronic resource]. URL: http://rebels-library.org/files/klein_ljudi_protiv_brendov.pdf (in Russian).

11. Madera A. G. (2014). Risks and Chance. Uncertainty, forecasting and estimation. Moscow, URSS, 441 p. (in Russian).

12. Potapova Yu. (2017). Not enough seats [Electronic resource] Rossijskaya gazeta – Ekonomika Sibiri. [Russian newspaper – The Economy of Siberia], no. 43 (7209) (in Russian).

13. Sitnina V. (2014). Territorial significance. Kommersant Vlast [Kommersant Power], no. 43 (in Russian).

14. Tarkaeva N. (2017). “Mono isn't always bad” [Electronic resource.] URL: http://tatcenter.ru/rubrics/lyudinashej-respubliki/natalya-tarkaeva-zamministraekonomiki-rt-quot-monogorod-eto-ne-vsegdaploho-quot/ (in Russian).

15. Tehjslina O. G. (2016). Trends in the development of territories of advanced socio-economic development in the Russian Federation. Modern Economics and Management: Approaches, Concepts, Models Proceedings of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference, pp. 98–100 (in Russian).

16. Chimitova S.Zh., Lihacheva V. V. (2016). Problems and prospects of development of territories of advanced development. Sovremennye tendencii v ekonomike i upravlenii: novyj vzglyad [ Modern Trends in Economics and Management: A New View], no. 39–1, pp. 62–67 (in Russian).