Sustainable Competitiveness of Companies: It Is Difficult to Maintain, Easy to Lose
Abstract
The loss of competitiveness by global companies that held leading positions in their industries and had significant core competencies for a very long time highlights a need for the analysis of such a phenomenon as long-term competitiveness. The aim of the research is to discover major causes of the loss of competitiveness. The goals include the detection of breaking points that force companies to remold their business activities aswell as the determination of factors that bring about the emergence of breaking points. The subject of sustainable competitiveness relates to both economics and management. That is why numerous theories including the neoclassical one, the institutional one etc. are applied to the study. The research methods include the case-study method as well as structural and comparative analysis. The study of 33 companies (from the USA, Canada, Germany, Sweden, China, South Korea and Japan) in five industries helps to reveal the most common breaking points as well as to determine and classify the internal and external factors that lead to them. The internal factors include crises of growth, diversification crises, innovation crises, reputation crises etc. The external ones include political, technological, economic and natural problems. The authors of the paper reach the conclusion that the loss of competitiveness by a company happens as a result of combined influence of internal and external factors.
Keywords
sustainable competitiveness,
growth crisis,
crisis of reform,
crisis of diversification,
investment crisis,
innovation crisis.
Journal of Economic Literature (JEL): D21, D22, L22, L25, L53, M14, M21
About the Authors
Irina P. Komarova
Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Vladimir L. Ustyuzhanin
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Adizes I. (2015). Corporate life cycle. Moscow, MannIvanov-Ferber (in Russian).
2. Argenti J. (1976). Corporate collapse: The causes and the symptoms. London, McGraw-Hill.
3. Argyris, C. (2004). Organizational learning. Moscow, INFRA-M (in Russian).
4. Avdasheva S.B., Dement'ev V.E. (2000). Joint and nonproperty integration mechanisms in Russian business groups. Rossiyskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal [Russian economic journal], no. 1, pp. 13–27 (in Russian).
5. Gurkov I.B. (2008). Corporate strategy and structure. Moscow, Delo (in Russian).
6. Dement'ev V.E. (2012). The role of firms of different sizes in individual phases of the long wave. Ekonomika i matematicheskie metody [Economics and Mathematical Methods], vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 33–46 (in Russian).
7. Evsyukov S.G. (2008). Methodology of research of the company's resource potential. Vestnik universiteta (Gosudarstvennyy universitet upravleniya). [University Bulletin (State University of Management)], no. 2 (12), pp. 28–33 (in Russian).
8. Karlgaard, R. (2015). The soft edge: Where great companies find lasting success. Moscow, Mann-IvanovFerber (in Russian).
9. Kachalov R.M. (2012). The dynamics of the institutional environment: The risk of undesirable changes in economic institutions. Monograph «Potential and Prospects for Russia's Economic Development under Modernization Conditions» (Chapter 7) / Pod red. G.B. Kleynera, O.Yu. Mamedova, V.V. Sorokozherd'eva. Moscow, Sovremennaya ekonomika i pravo, pp. 188–205 (in Russian).
10. Keller S., Prays K. (2014). Beyond Performance. How great organizations build ultimate competitive advantage. Per. s angl. Moscow, Al'pina Pablisher (in Russian).
11. Kleyner G.B. (2004). Evolution of institutional systems. Moscow, Nauka (in Russian).
12. Kotter J.P., Heskett J.L. (1992). Corporate culture and performance. New York, Free Press.
13. Kristensen K.M. (2015). The innovator’s dilemma. When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Per. s angl. Moscow, Al‘pina Pablisher (in Russian).
14. Lapitzkaya L.V. (2012). Competitive analysis and market research: Ratio of concepts and analytical procedures of carrying out. Nauchnyj zhurnal NIU ITMO [Scientific journal of NIU ITMO], no. 2, pp. 247–254 (in Russian).
15. Polterovich V.M. (2007). Elements of the theory of reform. Moscow, Ekonomika (in Russian).
16. Prakhalad S.K., Khamel G. (2003). The core competence of the corporation. Vestnik SPbGU [SPbSU Bulletin], no. 3 (24), pp. 18–41 (in Russian).
17. Tambovtsev V.L. (2010). The strategic theory of the firm: Present state and perspectives. Rossiyskiy zhurnal menedzhmenta [Russian Management Journal], vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 5–40 (in Russian).
18. Khamel G. (2007). Leading the revolution: How to thrive in turbulent times by marketing innovation a way of life. Moscow, BestBusinessBooks (in Russian).
Review
For citations:
Komarova I.P., Ustyuzhanin V.L. Sustainable Competitiveness of Companies: It Is Difficult to Maintain, Easy to Lose. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2018;(4):102-114. (In Russ.)
Views:
685
Email this article 