Development of World and Russian Nanoindustry: Results and Problems
Abstract
Almost a decade of the experience of a «catch-up» nanoindustrialization of the Russian economy faced with the crisis, slowdown in the economic growth and its absolute decline, technological opposition of competitors, introduction of external sanctions and opportunism of partners deserves a thorough scientific analysis and an evaluation of the achieved results, as well as the study of the prospects of the Russian nanoindustry development. In this respect, a comparative study of the dynamics of the object structure, volume and trends of the world and Russian market for nanotechnology products, actual problems of basic Russian and foreign databases of the nanoindustry’s intellectual and final goods is carried out in the article. The authors made an attempt to assess the contradictory influence of internal and external factors on the development of Russian nanoindustry and to draw some general conclusions on the state, potential and trends of the national nanoindustry development in a global context.
Keywords
наноиндустриализация,
наноиндустрия,
нанотехнологии,
рынок нанотехнологической продукции,
санкции против РФ,
политика импортозамещения,
nanoindustrialization,
nanoindustry,
nanotechnology,
market for nanotechnology products,
sanctions against the Russian Federation,
import substitution policy
About the Authors
O. V. Inshakov
Волгоградский государственный университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
E. I. Inshakova
Волгоградский государственный университет
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Годовой отчет акционерного общества «РОСНАНО» за 2015 год. М., 2016. URL: http://www.rusnano.com/upload/images/normativedocs/ROSNANO-AO_Annual_Report_2015_RUS.pdf.
2. Иншаков О.В., Фесюн А.В. Национальная политика развития наноиндустрии: проблемы формирования и реализации // Власть. 2010. № 8. С. 4-8.
3. Механизмы реализации стратегии формирования наноиндустрии в регионах России / под ред. О.В. Иншакова. Волгоград: Изд-во ВолГУ, 2009.
4. Об итогах социально-экономического развития Российской Федерации в 2015 году. М.: Минэкономразвития России, 2016.
5. Рих А. Хозяйственная этика. М.: Посев, 1996.
6. Широв А.А., Янтовский А.А., Потапенко В.В. Оценка потенциального влияния санкций на экономическое развитие России и ЕС // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2015. № 4. С. 3-16.
7. Шумпетер Й.А. Теория экономического развития. М.: Прогресс, 1982.
8. Яминский И., Филонов А., Синицына О., Мешков Г. Программное обеспечение «Фемто Скан Онлайн» // Наноиндустрия. 2016. № 2. С. 42-47.
9. Dickson D. Advanced manufacturing in a highly connected world. Deloitt & Touche Tohmatsu Limited, 2015.
10. Global Nanomaterials Market - Segmented by Product Type, End-User Industry, and Geography -Trends and Forecasts (2015-2020). Hyderabad: Mordor Intelligence LLP, 2016.
11. Global Nanotechnology Market Outlook, 2022. Noida: RNCOS E-Services Pvt. Ltd., 2015.
12. Hansen S.F., Heggelund L.R., Besora PR. et al. Nanoproducts - what is actually available to European consumers? // Environmental Science: Nano. 2016. № 3. Р. 169-180.
13. Hirooka M. Nonlinear dynamism of innovation and business cycles // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2003.Vol. 13. № 5. P. 549-576.
14. Inshakov O., Inshakova E. Russian nanotechnology industry development: The impact of external political and economic sanctions // European Research Studies Journal. 2016. Vol. XIX. Issue 2. P. 189-204.
15. Nano-enabled environmental products and technologies -opportunities and drawbacks. Copenhagen: The Danish Environmental Protection Agency. December, 2015. URL: http://www2.mst.dk/Udgiv/publications/2015/12/978-87-93352-96-4.pdf.
16. Nanotechnology Patents in USPTO and EPO in 2015. Statnano Publications, 2016. July. URL: file://C:/Users/Иншакова%20Е%20И/Downloads/main_2cd8e756a9890539c2c9ecebe6926567.pdf.
17. Nanotechnology Update: Corporations up their spending as revenues for nano-enabled products increase. Boston: Lux Research Inc., 2013.
18. Nanotechnology Update: U.S. Leads in Government Spending Amidst Increased Spending Across Asia. Boston: Lux Research Inc., 2015.
19. Rejeski D. Consumer Product Safety Commission FY2010 Agenda and Priorities. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, 2009. URL: http://www.nanotechproject.org/process/assets/files/8278/pen_submission_cpsc.pdf.
20. Savolainen K., Backman U., Brouwer D. et al. Nanosafety in Europe 2015-2025: Towards safe and sustainable nanomaterials and nanotechnology innovations. Helsinki: EDITA, 2013.
21. Szczepatlski M. Economic impact on the EU of sanctions over Ukraine conflict. Brussels: European Parliamentary Research Service, 2015. URL: http://europa.eu/newsroom/highlights/special-coverage/eu_sanctions/index_en.htm.
22. Vance M.E., Kuiken T., Vejerano E.P et al. Nanotechnology in the real world: Redeveloping the nanomaterial consumer products inventory // Beilstein Journal of Nanotechnology. 2015. № 6. P 1769-1780.
Review
For citations:
Inshakov O.V., Inshakova E.I. Development of World and Russian Nanoindustry: Results and Problems. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2016;(4):65-78. (In Russ.)
Views:
692
Email this article 