USA leading regional centers of technological entrepreneurship in artificial intelligence

The article is devoted to the US leading regional centers of technological entrepreneurship in artificial intelligence and their advantages for AI-startups developing. The history of 45 AI-startups that achieved the status of “unicorn companies” between 2022 and 2024 was studied. The focus was on the local context for the successful development of these companies, including: infrastructure and a market of specialized AI industry providers; talented specialists interested in developing AI-solutions; venture capital market and sales opportunities. Startups benefit from the latest technological solutions for creating AI products, strong teams, partner’s support and the ability to scale quickly. Five regions were identified, in which the transformation of AI-startups into a unicorn companies was observed. The leader among them is Silicon Valley, where more than 70% of such transformations have occurred. New York ranks second with a similar indicator of 15%. The other regions are Boston, Austin, and Seattle. Each region shows its strengths and advantages for local AI startups. The discussion of the results summarizes the regional context in the United States facilitating the stages of a startup’s life cycle before becoming a “unicorn company”. The possibilities for implementing the successful experience of developing U.S. AI entrepreneurship in Russia are identified. In particular, three pressing challenges for Russia that are successfully solved in the American economy are identified: diversification of national production through increasing productivity based on AI technologies; expansion of national consumer market and the share of the middle class in the population due to AI projects in the “long tail” digital economy; and the involvement of incumbents represented by large public companies in the development of science, education and ecosystems of AI entrepreneurship.

1. Aganbegyan A.G. (2023). “Silicon Valleys” — ​innovation zones in the USA, China, EU, Russia, and other countries. Economics of Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 8–19. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22394/2410-132X-2023-9-2-8-19

2. Ahluwalia S., Kassicieh S. (2024). Pathways to Success: The Interplay of Industry and Venture Capital Clusters in Entrepreneurial Company Exits. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, no. 17 (4), pp. 159. DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17040159

3. Akcigit U., Kerr W.R. (2018). Growth through Heterogeneous Innovations. Journal of Political Economy, no. 126 (4), pp. 1374–1443.

4. Audretsch D.B., Belitski M., Caiazza R., Chowdhury F., Menter M. (2023). Entrepreneurial growth, value creation and new technologies. The Journal of Technology Transfer, no. 48 (5), pp. 1535–1551. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-023-10034-w

5. Barrat J. (2013). Our Final Invention: Artificial Intelligence and the End of the Human Era. New York: Thomas Dunne Books. 396 p.

6. Brown K.C., Wiles K.W. (2015). In Search of Unicorns: Private IPOs and the Changing Markets for Private Equity Investments and Corporate Control. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, no. 27 (3), pp. 34–48.

7. Brykin A.V., Makushin M.V. (2021). Microelectronics and State Policy of High-Tech Countries: Nationalization Instead of Globalization. Electronics: Science, Technology, Business, no. 9 (210), pp. 148–156. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22184/1992-4178.2021.210.9.148.156

8. Butuzova A.S. (2018). Capitalization of International Uniсorn Companies: To What Extent Is It Feasible? Finance and Credit, vol. 24, iss. 2, pp. 430–438. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24891/fc.24.2.430

9. Chyhryna N., Yanushchyk A. (2025). The role of venture business entities in startup development. Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 5. Economics. Sociology. Biology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 35–49. (In Russ.)

10. Colombelli A., D’Amico E., Paolucci E. (2023). When computer science is not enough: Universities knowledge specializations behind artificial intelligence startups in Italy. The Journal of Technology Transfer, no. 48 (5), pp. 1599–1627. DOI: 10.1007/s10961-023-10029-7

11. Engel J.S. (2015). Global clusters of innovation: Lessons from Silicon Valley. California Management Review, no. 57 (2), pp. 36–65.

12. Grinin L.E., Grinin A.L., Grinin I.L. (2023). Artificial Intelligence: Development and Concerns. A Look into the Future. Article one. Information Technology and Artificial Intelligence: The Past, Present and Some Forecasts. Philosophy and Society, no. 3, pp. 5–35. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.30884/jfio/2023.03.01

13. Jose J., Bakshi P., Khan F. (2025). Spawning Butterflies — ​Value Flow across Startup Lifecycle Stages. Foresight and STI Governance, no. 19 (3), pp. 34–48. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/fstig.2025.27034.

14. Kamolov S.G., Varos A.A., Kriebitz A., Alashkevich M.Y. (2022). Dominants of national strategies for the development of artificial intelligence in Russia, Germany, and the USA. Public Administration Issues, no. 2, pp. 85–105. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2022-0-2-85-105.

15. Kanbach D.K., Heiduk L., Blueher G., Schreiter M., Lahmann A. (2024). The GenAI is out of the bottle: generative artifcial intelligence from a business model innovation perspective. Review of Managerial Science, no. 18, pp. 1189–1220. DOI: 10.1007/s11846-023-00696-z

16. Kutsenko E., Tyurchev K., Ostashchenko T. (2022). Relocation as a Driver of Innovative Activity: A Global Study of Unicorn Founders’ Migration. Foresight and STI Governance, no. 16 (4), pp. 6–23. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2022.4.6.23

17. Lee K.-F. (2019). AI Superpowers. China, Silicon Valley, and the New World Order. New York: Harper Business. 272 p.

18. Li Y., Mahoney J.T. (2011). When are venture capital projects initiated? Journal of Business Venturing, no. 26 (2), pp. 239–254.

19. Maslej N., Fattorini L., Perrault R., Gil Y., Parli V., Kariuki N., Capstick E., Reuel A., Brynjolfsson E., Etchemendy J., Ligett K., Lyons T., Manyika J., Niebles J.C., Shoham Y., Wald R., Walsh T., Hamrah A., Santarlasci L., Lotufo J.B., Rome A., Shi A., Oak S. (2025). The AI Index 2025 Annual Report. Stanford (CA): AI Index Steering Committee, Institute for Human-Centered AI. Stanford: Stanford University.

20. McAfee A., Brynjolfsson E. (2017). Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 416 p.

21. Mikhaylenko V.I., Mamin N.V. (2023). Regional economic integration in the post-pandemic period (using the example of Southeast Asia). Management Issues, no. 17 (3), pp. 32–44. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.22394/2304-3369-2023-3-32-44

22. Miloud T., Aspelund A., Cabrol M. (2012). Startup valuation by venture capitalists: An empirical study. Venture Capital, no. 14 (2–3), pp. 151–174. DOI: 10.1080/13691066.2012.667907

23. Niu B., Ren J., Li X. (2019). Credit Scoring Using Machine Learning by Combing Social Network Information: Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending. Information, no. 12, рp. 397–411. DOI: 10.3390/info10120397

24. Peters T. (2018). The Excellence Dividend: Meeting the Tech Tide with Work That Wows and Jobs That Last. Vintage (NY): Vintage Anchor Publishing. 479 p.

25. Rai A., Constantinides P., Sarker S. (2019). Next-Generation Digital Platforms: Toward Human-AI Hybrids. MIS Quarterly, no. 43 (1), pp. 3–9.

26. Romanelli E., Khessina O.M. (2005). Regional Industrial Identity: Cluster Configurations and Economic Development. Organization Science, no. 16 (4), pp. 344–358.

27. Sataev P.A. (2022). Recommendations for the development of a start-up in considering significant factors. Izvestiâ Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo èkonomičeskogo universiteta, no. 3 (135), pp. 184–193. (In Russ.)

28. Shkalenko A.V., Fadeeva E.A. (2022). Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Creative Industries: Trends and Prospects. Journal of Volgograd State University. Economics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 44–59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.15688/ek.jvolsu.2022.3.4

29. Yakovleva E.A., Vinogradov A.N., Aleksandrova L.V., Filimonov A.P. (2023). How artificial intelligence helps transform the digital economy. Russian Journal of Innovation Economics, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 707–726. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/vinec.13.2.117710

30. World Bank. (2024). World Development Report 2024: The Middle-Income Trap. Washington, DC: World Bank. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-2078-6

31. Zemtsov S.P. (2022). Technological entrepreneurship as a development factor of Russia. Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 1 (53), pp. 212–223. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-11

32. Zhdanov D.A. (2024). Influence of generative artificial intelligence on company operations. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 1 (104), pp. 89–102. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2024-1(104)-89-102