Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

Territorial development through business and local community interaction: Priority areas and assessment of the enterprises’ contribution

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-137-149

EDN: REZHBI

Abstract

This study addresses how modern companies can align their key objectives of production development, revenue generation, and strengthening competitive advantages with demands of society and the state for solving social issues, as well as the integration of environmental and ethical principles into their business activities. The objective of the study is to identify priority areas and assess the contribution of Russian businesses to the development of their local communities through interactions. Based on analysis of the current state of affairs and study of public opinion of local industrial enterprises, expectations regarding business contribution to the development of urban and rural areas are identified. Key areas for improving the comfort of the urban environment are identified. The role of business in creating and maintaining comfortable living conditions in cities is underestimated. Indicators for assessing the contribution of enterprises to the development of their local communities, including the environmental well-being of the population, are proposed. The study focuses on the development of regions where Russian businesses operate through their interaction with local communities. It examines the priority areas and contribution of businesses to the development of their regions through interaction with local communities. It was established that the key points of convergence between the interests of businesses and local residents are addressing the issue of personnel shortages and the existing contradiction between the public’s expectations of business participation in socially significant activities and the existing potential of companies in this area. It is proposed to supplement the national “Sustainable Development Goals” system, data on which is published on the Rosstat website, with specific indicators for assessing business contribution to regional development, to implement the developed coefficients for the environmental responsibility (the key, most widely represented of the 17 “Sustainable Development Goals”) of municipal enterprises and the level of environmental reliability of regional enterprise projects, and to rank the priority areas of socially responsible business activity based on the number of settlements and public opinion.

About the Authors

Nikita A. Nenast’ev
Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Economic), junior researcher



Natal’ya N. Yashalova
Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets
Russian Federation

Dr. Sci. (Economic), leading researcher, associate professor



Evgeniya V. Potravnaya
Cherepovets State University, Cherepovets
Russian Federation

Cand. Sci. (Sociology), research fellow



References

1. Akhunov R.R. (2025). Assessment of the contribution of large companies to the socio-economic development of the regions. Economics and Management: A scientific and practical journal, no. 2, pp. 4–11. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34773/EU.2025.2.1

2. Belyayeva I. Yu., Danilova O.V. (2023). Social and economic consequences of ESG — transformation of models of interaction between government and business in the territories of presence. Municipal Academy, no. 4, pp. 98–105. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.52176/2304831X_2023_04_98; EDN: XCRNIQ

3. Garayev O.R., Belkina Ye.N., Musostov Z.R. (2022). Territory development management based on the concept of regional image. Natural-Humanitarian Studies, no. 44 (6), pp. 403–408. (In Russ.) EDN: YBRGAA

4. Eremeeva O.S. (2025). Reflecting the impact on the sustainable development of the territory in non-financial reporting of companies. Public Administration, no. 1, pp. 142–168. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.17323/1999-5431-2025-0-1-142-168

5. Zvereva A.D., Perskaya V.V., Mamedov T.N. (2023). “S”–component in the activities of Russian companies as a component of ESG-strategy. Social and Labor Research, no. 52 (3), pp. 104–114. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.34022/2658-3712-2023-52-3-104-114; EDN: VIZGZZ

6. Kleiner G.B. (2020). Systemic reconstruction of Russia’s socioeconomic space. The Economic Revival of Russia, no. 2 (64), pp. 59–69. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.37930/1990-9780-2020-2-64-59-69

7. Kleiner G.B., Rybachuk M.A., Ushakov D.V. (2023). Economic agents and social institutions: A behavioral interaction model. Terra Economicus, no. 21 (4), pp. 55–68. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2023-21-4-55-68

8. Kolodnyaya G.V. (2023). Social responsibility of business as a key factor of sustainable development. Economics, Taxes & Law, no. 16 (5), pp. 78–85. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X2023-16-5-78-85; EDN COHQUX

9. Niyazmetov A.K. (2025). The national standard for assessing the business reputation of business entities based on the ECG rating of responsible business and the direction of its development. Economics, Taxes & Law, no. 18 (2), pp. 77–89. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2025-18-2-77-89

10. Popodko G.I. (2025). The role of ESG–principles in ensuring sustainable development of a resource region. Economics. Profession. Business, no. 1, pp. 72–80. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.14258/epb202508; EDN: LZTOML

11. Protasova T.N. (2025). Social policy as the basis of interaction between the organization, the state and society. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, no. 1, pp. 15–20. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.24158/spp.2025.1.1; EDN: VGAHWJ

12. Tambovtsev V.L., Rozhdestvenskaia I.A. (2025). Culture of territorial planning. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 28 (2), pp. 14–27. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2025-28(2)-14-27. EDN: PZIMCS

13. Trapeznikova I.S. (2019). The modern model of Russian business social responsibility in the context of skilled labor force formation at the territory of presence. Russian Journal of Labor Economics, no. 6 (2), pp. 689–698. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.18334/et.6.2.39794; EDN: NGNNWF

14. Yamshchikova T.N., Zhuravleva T.A. (2020). Institutionalism and modern socio-economic trends of social development. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (90), pp. 7–18. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2020-3(90)-7-18

15. Yashalova N.N., Potravnaya E.V., Nenast’ev N.A. (2025a). The impact of digital transformation on the development of new forms of interaction between business and society. Scientific and Technical Information Processing. Series 1. Organization and Methods of Information Work, no. 8, рp. 1–8. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.36535/0548-0019-2025-08-1

16. Yashalova N.N., Potravnaya E.V. et al. (2025b). Involvement of ferrous metallurgy enterprises in the development of their operating territories: interaction between business and population. Metal, no. 5, pp. 46–50. (In Russ.)

17. Abidin Z., Jalal J., Sodiq A. (2025). The five tiers of corporate social responsibility (CSR): from risk management to social business. Social Responsibility Journal, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 940–961. DOI: 10.1108/SRJ-03-2023-0146

18. Anistia S. (2024). The analysis of business model in social entrepreneurship. Facing Resilient Future through Sustainability and Innovation: Multidisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 2, pp. 10–17. DOI: 10.33830/osc.v2i1.2498

19. Koç D. (2025). Business in the age of digital economy: an analysis from the perspective of social inequality and leadership. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 1455–1464. DOI: 10.51244/IJRSI.2025.12040161

20. Lin W.L. (2024). The role of corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility in shaping corporate reputation: An analysis of competitive action and innovation strategies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, no. 31 (2), pp. 1451–1468. DOI: 10.1002/csr.2640

21. Long H. (2025). Environmental ethics and business decisions: social implications for sustainability. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, no. 5 (5), pp. e06604. DOI: 10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n05.pe06604

22. Mantey N. (2024). Corporate social responsibility: benefit(s) to company and society case of Vodafone Ghana Limi­ted. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, no. 11 (12), pp. 122–142. DOI: 10.14738/assrj.1112.16844

23. Rozalina N., Ellitan L. (2025). Achieving sustainability and improving global business performance through business ethics and corporate social responsibility: A Systematic Literature Review. Eksis: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, no. 19 (1), pp. 1–12. DOI: 10.26533/eksis.v19i1.1286

24. Sajitha J., Renukadevi D., Guhapriya K.S. (2025). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its effect on business growth. Journal of the Oriental Institute, M.S. University of Baroda, vol. 74, iss. 01, no. 1, pp. 37–41. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/391909863_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_CSR_and_its_effects_on_Business_Growth (accessed: 25.05/2025).

25. Srivastava A., Ganesh L. et al. (2025). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and its impact on business reputation. Journal of Informatics Education and Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 2473–2486. DOI: 10.52783/jier.v5i2.2704

26. Taofeek A. (2025). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) and compliance: aligning business goals with legal obligations. Researchgate.net [site]. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388928426_Corporate_Social_Responsibility_CSR_and_Compliance_Aligning_Business_Goals_with_Legal_Obligations


Review

For citations:


Nenast’ev N.A., Yashalova N.N., Potravnaya E.V. Territorial development through business and local community interaction: Priority areas and assessment of the enterprises’ contribution. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2026;29(1):137-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2026-29(1)-137-149. EDN: REZHBI

Views: 104

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)