Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

Digitalization of domestic manufacturing companies: status and prospects

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2023-2(101)-127-141

EDN: ENNKQF

Abstract

The digital transformation of enterprises is one of the priority national tasks and, although sanctions restrictions have slowed down its implementation, they have not reduced its relevance. The purpose of this study was to analyze the industry-specific features of the digitalization of domestic companies, build a digital maturity rating of enterprises and organizations in various industrial sectors and areas of social activity in Russia. The methodological basis of the work is the study of statistical reporting demonstrating the use of digital technologies by domestic companies, as well as empirical data obtained from surveys of leaders of domestic and foreign firms. The study initially analyzed the statistical data describing the course of the digital transformation of domestic enterprises, and identified three metrics to assess the changes occurring under the influence of digitalization in industry and the social sphere. The following indicators were chosen as such indicators: expenditures on information and communication technologies (ICT); number of employees using ICT; range of digital technologies used. The choice of this set of parameters is connected, on the one hand, with the importance of indicators for assessing the level of digital development, and on the other hand, with the availability of detailed quantitative data characterizing the marked sections of enterprises' activities and allowing us to compare the changes taking place in each of the areas under consideration. The combination of the above criteria makes it possible to comprehensively assess the ongoing changes, given that the above figures affect their various aspects. In conclusion, an algorithm for comparing industries is proposed, based on the selected indicators and taking into account their significance (weight), and the ranking of industries is carried out. Such a comparison made it possible to form four groups that differ in the level of digital maturity of their sectors, which became the main scientific result of the work. It is shown that the top lines of the list were occupied by industries that initially focused on a high-tech base, as well as those that were able to include digital solutions in their business processes, learned how to transform information into products, into monetary results.

About the Author

D.   A. Zhdanov
Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Dmitriy A. Zhdanov, Doct. Sc. (Economics), Associate Professor, Leading Researcher

Moscow



References

1. Aleksashina T. V., Smagina V. I., Smagina V. V. (2020). Modern research in the field of digital maturity of HR business processes in support of corporate digital transformation. Scientific Works of the Free Economic Society of Russia, vol. 224, no. 4, pp. 86–102 (in Russian). DOI: 10.38197/2072-2060-2020-224-4-86-102

2. Zhdanov D. A. (2022). Human capital of an enterprise: a model of employee competencies in the digital world. π-Economy, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 58–74 (in Russian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.15504

3. Iordanova V. G., Cherenkova S. A. (2022). The impact of digitalization of the world economy on economic growth in the countries of the world (on the example of China and the USA). Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, no. 8, pp. 36–53 (in Russian). DOI: 10.24412/2072-8042-2022-8-36-53

4. Katrin E. V. (2022). «Digi­talization»: scientific approaches to the definition of the term. Bulletin of the Transbaikal State University, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 49–54 (in Russian). DOI: 10.21209/2227-9245-2022-28-5-49-54

5. Kuzmin P. S. (2021). Digitization of the industry: an empirical assessment of the digital maturity of enterprises. Strategic decisions and risk management, no. 12 (3), рp. 220–235 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.17747/2618-947X‑2021-3-220-235

6. Kulagin V., Sukharevski A., Meffert Y. (2019). Digital@Scale: Handbook on business digitalization. Moscow: Intellectual Literature. 293 p. (in Russian).

7. Merzlov I.Yu., Shilova E. V., Sannikova E. A., Sedinin M. A. (2020). Comprehensive methodology for assessing the level of digitalization of organizations. Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law, no. 9, pp. 2379–2396 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18334/epp.10.9.110856

8. NRU HSE (2021a). Trends in the development of the Internet: the readiness of the economy and society to function in a digital environment: an analytical report. G. I. Abdrakhmanova, M. D. Vanyushina, K. O. Vishnevsky, L. M. Gohberg et al. Moscow: NRU HSE. 248 p. (in Russian). URL: https://cctld.ru/upload/iblock/1f2/tendencies‑2021.pdf

9. NRU HSE (2021b). Digital transformation of industries: starting conditions and priorities. Moscow: NRU HSE. 239 p. (in Russian). URL: https://conf.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/463148459.pdf

10. NRU HSE (2022a). Index of digitalization of economic and social sectors. Digital Economy. October 18. (in Russian). URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/785333175.pdf

11. NRU HSE (2022b). Digital transformation: expectations and reality. Moscow: NRU HSE. 221 p. (in Russian). URL: https://4822.digital/upload/iblock/e5e/yxez8gnqobqy60z7z551ya733h0y2lqo/Доклад%20ВШЭ.pdf

12. NRU HSE (2023). Digital Economy Indicators: 2022: Statistical Collection. Moscow: NRU HSE. 332 p. (in Russian). URL: https://issek.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/780810055.pdf

13. Prokhorov A., Konik L. (2019). Digital transformation. Analysis, trends, world experience. Moscow: Alliance Print. 460 p. (in Russian).

14. Pogoreltsev A. S., Salimyanova I. G. (2022). Features of assessing the digital maturity of organizations. Izvestia of the St. Petersburg State University of Economics, no. 5 (137), pp. 118–125 (in Russian).

15. Rudycheva N. (2021). The demand for digitalization of industry in Russia will increase 14 times by 2030. CNews, 08.12.2021 (in Russian). URL: https://www.cnews.ru/reviews/it_v_promyshlennosti_

16. 2021/articles/spros_na_tsifrovizatsiyu_promyshlennosti

17. Surtaeva O. S. (2021). Digitalization in the system of innovative strategies in the socio-economic sphere and industrial production: monograph. Moscow: Dashkov i K. 154 p. (in Russian).

18. Tsenzharik M. K., Krylova Yu.V., Steshenko V. I. (2020). Digital transformation of companies: strategic analysis, factors of influence and models. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Economy, vol. 36, iss. 3, pp. 390–420. (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu05.2020.303

19. Cherkasova V. A., Slepushenko G. A. (2021). The impact of business digitalization on the financial performance of Russian companies. Finance: Theory and Practice, no. 25 (2), pp. 128–142 (in Russian). DOI: 10.26794/2587-5671-2021-25-2-128-142

20. Shabaltina L. V. (2022). Digital maturity as a tool for purposeful transformation of technological patterns. Creative Economy, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 2055–2072 (in Russian). DOI: 10.18334/ce.16.6.114863

21. Calvino F., Criscuolo C., Marcolin L., Squicciarini M. (2018). A taxonomy of digital intensive sectors. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, no. 14. Paris: OECD Publishing. 257 p.

22. EС (European Commission). (2022). Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). URL: https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi

23. Fueling Growth Through Data Monetization. (2017). McKinsey & Company. 1 December.

24. Kotarba M. (2017). Measuring digitalization: Key metrics. Foundations of Management, vol. 9, iss. 1, pp. 123–138. URL: https://doi.org/10.1515/fman‑2017-0010

25. Manyika J., Ramaswamy S., Khanna S., Sarrazin H., Pinkus G., Sethupathy G., Yaffe A. (2015). Digital America: a Tale of the Haves and Have-Mores. Mckinsey Global Institute. 1 December.

26. OECD (2019). Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future. Paris: OECD.

27. Ployhart R. E., Nyberg A. J., Reilly G., Maltarich M. A. (2014). Human capital is dead; Long live human capital resources. Journal of Management, no. 40, pp. 371–398. DOI: 10.1177/0149206313512152.

28. Salviotti G., Gaur A., Pennarola F. (2019). Strategic factors enabling digital maturity: an extended survey. MCIS2019 Proceedings. 15. URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/mcis2019/15

29. Weber C., Konigsberger J., Kassner L., Mitschang B. (2017). M2DDM – ​A maturity model for data driven manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, vol. 63, pp. 173–178.

30. Zavareh T., Eigner M. (2021). Determination of engineering digitalization maturity. International conference on engineering design (ICED). 16–20 August, 2021, Gothenburg (Sweden).


Review

For citations:


Zhdanov D. . Digitalization of domestic manufacturing companies: status and prospects. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2023;(2):127-141. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2023-2(101)-127-141. EDN: ENNKQF

Views: 558


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)