Evaluation Methods of Russian Direct Investments Abroad
Abstract
The article aims to explain methods of obtaining adequate statistical information on Russian FDI. Main features of different sources of Russian FDI statistics are shown. The importance of additional accurate calculations of FDI data for both qualitative and quantitative studies of Russian FDI is stressed. Evaluation methods for Russian outward FDI stocks and their geographical structure are introduced. Special attention is paid to financial reports of Russian multinational enterprises (MNEs) and their foreign assets statistics. Methodology for ranking of top non-financial MNEs is explained. “Migrant” TNCs as a special type of Russian investors has been identified. A list of 16 largest Russian non-financial MNEs (excluding “migrant” companies) is presented. At the end of 2017 it was headed by LUKOIL, Gazprom and Rosneft (they are also among the 100 largest non-financial MNEs of developing and post-socialist countries, although the latter is not reflected in the relevant UNCTAD reports). In addition, the leading Russian MNEs include steel, non-ferrous metal and transport companies, as well as diversified conglomerates (delimitation of their borders is still the subject of scientific discussions). Five Russian transnational banks with the maximum capital of foreign subsidiaries are also named in the article. It is shown that the 20 leading Russian non-financial and banking investors account for only 27% of Russian FDI stock. Even taking into account the second tier MNEs, the contribution of FDI to the company's subsidiaries is less than 50% – the rest FDI stock is accounted for investments in foreign real estate and various financial manipulations of Russians.
Supporting agencies: The article was prepared with the financial support of the Russian National Science Foundation (Grant No. 14-28-00097 “Optimization of Russian External Investment Relations under Conditions of Worsening Relations with the EU”) at the IMEMO RAN.
About the Author
Alexey V. Kuznetsov
Primakov National Research Institute of World Economy and International Relations (IMEMO) of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
References
1. Antonenko N.S., Galukhina Ya.S., Pappe Ya.Sh. (2013). Main tendencies of Russian big business development in 2000s. Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 1, pp. 114–136 (in Russian).
2. Borrmann Ch. (2003) Methodological problems of FDI statistics in accession countries and EU countries. HWWA Report, no. 231, 38 p.
3. Kalotay K., Sulstarova A. (2010) Modelling Russian outward FDI. Journal of International Management, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 131–142.
4. Kuznetsov A.V. (2009). Difficulties of the Russian FDI Calculations. Vestnik FBU “Gosudarstvennaya registratsionnaya palata pri Ministerstve Yustitsii RF”, no. 2, pp. 47–51 (in Russian).
5. Kuznetsov A.V. (2014). Russian direct investment as a factor of Eurasian integration. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 58–69 (English translation in Problems of Economic Transition, 2016, no. 4, pp. 348–361).
6. Kuznetsov A.V., Kvashnin Yu.D., Gutnik A.V. (2013). Monitoring of mutual investments in the CIS – 2013. St. Petersburg: EDB Centre for Integration Studies, 54 p.
7. Kvashin Yu.D. (2018). The Republic of Cyprus as a transit point for foreign capital. Outlines of Global Transformations: Politics, Economics, Law, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 170–184 (in Russian).
8. Liuhto K.T., Majuri S.S. (2014). Outward foreign direct investment from Russia: A literature review. Journal of East-West Business, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 198–224.
9. OECD (2008). Benchmark definition of foreign direct investment: 4th edition. Paris: OECD Publishing. URL: http://www.oecd.org/daf/inv/investmentstatisticsandanalysis/40193734.pdf.
10. Sauvant K.P., Govitrikar V.P., Davies K. (eds.). (2011). MNEs from emerging markets: New players in the world FDI market. N.Y.: Vale Columbia Center on Sustainable International Investment. URL:http://ccsi.columbia.edu/files/2014/01/EMGP_-_eBook_PDF_2_11.pdf.
11. Srivastava S. (2003). What is the true level of FDI flows to India? Economic and Political Weekly, vol. 38, no. 7, pp. 608–610.
12. UNCTAD (2009). Training Manual on Statistics for FDI and the Operations of TNCs. Volume II: Statistics on the Operations of Transnational Corporations. NY & Geneva: UN. URL: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/diaeia20092_en.pdf.
13. World Investment Report (2006). FDI from Developing and Transition Economies Implications for Development. NY & Geneva: UN. URL: http://unctad.org/en/Docs/wir2006_en.pdf.
14. World Investment Report (2017). Methodological Note. NY & Geneva: UN. URL: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationChapters/wir2017chMethodNote_en.pdf.
15. World Investment Report (2018). Investment and New Industrial Policies. NY & Geneva: UN. URL: http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/wir2018_en.pdf.
Review
For citations:
Kuznetsov A.V. Evaluation Methods of Russian Direct Investments Abroad. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2018;(4):37-50. (In Russ.)
Views:
997
Email this article 