The Impact of Digital Product Type on the Product Lifecycle
https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2025-28(3)-54-63
EDN: XXJTVV
Abstract
In the context of the rapid digitalization of the economy, the effective management of the life cycle of digital products is becoming a critical element of sustainable development. This study aims to analyze the impact of the typological characteristics of digital products on the structure and duration of their life cycle, and to develop recommendations for managing this process. This paper proposes a typology-oriented model of the life cycle of digital products, taking into account architectural flexibility, update frequency, user interaction nature, payment form dependence degree, and institutional constraints. Based on an analysis of scientific literature, industry reports and the practices of digital platforms, an original classification of digital products has been developed, as well as an adapted eight-stage life cycle model. This differs from traditional models in that it takes into account the specifics of the digital environment. A comparative analysis was conducted on different product types, including software, digital assets, data, internet services, digital goods, and hybrid formats. For the first time, life cycle extension strategies have been systematized, taking into account technological dynamics and market volatility. The obtained results clarify the regularities in the development of digital solutions in a market environment and can be used to optimize the economic models of digital product management in a transformational digital economy. Special attention is paid to digital assets and data as products with a non-standard development trajectory. The practical significance of this work lies in its potential application to strategic planning, investment assessment, and product life cycle monitoring. The approaches presented can be used for digital market research, business analytics, and public policy in the field of digital economy regulation.
About the Authors
Alina A. IzmailovaRussian Federation
Aleksandr G. Budrin
Russian Federation
Dr. Sci. (Economic), Professor
References
1. Amany S., Sharify A.J. (2025). Strategic Management of E-Commerce. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, no. 2,
2. pp. 250–258. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.025002117
3. Balan C. (2014). Dave Chaffey, Digital Business and E-commerce Management: Strategy, Implementation and Practice. Journal of Business, no. 9, pp. 379–381.
4. Catalini Ch., Gans J. (2020). Some simple economics of the blockchain. Communications of the ACM, no. 63, pp. 80–90. 10.1145/3359552.
5. Chakraborty P.T., King D., Lee J.K. et al. (2015). Electronic Commerce: A Managerial and Social Networks Perspective. 8th ed. Springer Verlag.
6. Cooper R. (2008). Perspective: The Stage-Gate Idea-to-Launch Process – Update, What’s New, and NexGen Systems. Journal of Product Innovation Management, no. 25 (3), pp. 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00296.x
7. Dong X., McIntyre S. (2014). The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. Quantitative Finance, no. 14, pp. 1895–1896. https://doi.org/10.1080/14697688.2014.946440
8. EmergenceWeb. (2013). Embracing Digital Technology. EmergenceWeb. URL: https://emergenceweb.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/embracing-digital-technology.pdf
9. Gartner. (2025). Set, Vet and Execute Your Technology Product Strategy: Guide product direction, align teams and cultivate support with a technology product innovation strategy and roadmap. Gartner. URL: https://www.gartner.com/en/product-management/topics/product-strategy-roadmap
10. Gawer An., Cusumano M. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, no. 31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12105
11. IBM Institute for Business Value. (2025a). Digital product alchemy: 5 lessons in driving revenue through customer obsession. IBM. URL: https://www.ibm.com/downloads/documents/us-en/10a99803fbafdc8d
12. IBM Institute for Business Value. (2025b). The product management paradox: Shed the schedule, obsess over value. IBM. https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/en-us/report/product-management-paradox
13. Jin X., Xie Q. (2024). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Excessive Financialization in the Real Economy. Sustainability, no. 16 (23), 10464. https://doi.org/10.3390/su162310464
14. Kotler P., Armstrong G. (2023). Principles of Marketing (19th ed.). Glendale, Pearson Education.
15. Lambrecht A., Tucker C. (2015). Can Big Data Protect a Firm from Competition? SSRN Electronic Journal. 10.2139/ssrn.2705530.
16. Laudon K.C., Traver C.G. (2017). E-commerce 2017: Business, Technology, Society. 13th ed. Glendale, Pearson.
17. Levitt T. (1965). Exploit the Product Life Cycle. Harvard Business Review, no. 43, pp. 81–94.
18. Magistretti S., Trabucchi D. (2024). Agile-as-a-tool and agile-as-a-culture: A comprehensive review of agile approaches. Review of Managerial Science, no. 19, pp. 223–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00745-1
19. Mastercard. (2025). Fraud on Digital Goods. URL: https://www.mastercard.com/content/dam/public/mastercardcom/globalrisk/pdf/Frontiers_in_Fraud/Fraud%20on%20Digital%20Goods.pdf
20. McKinsey & Company. (2024). Technology trends outlook 2024. Retrieved April 7, 2025. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-top-trends-in-tech
21. Porter M.E., Heppelmann J.E. (2015). How Smart, Connected Products Are Transforming Competition. Harvard Business Review, no. 93 (10), pp. 96–114. URL: https://eclass.aegean.gr/modules/document/file.php/TNEY202/HBR_How-Smart-Connected-Products-Are-Transforming-Competition%20copy.pdf
22. Romero D., Gaiardelli P., Pezzotta G. et al. (2019). The Impact of Digital Technologies on Services Characteristics: Towards Digital Servitization. Advances in Service Science, no. 1, pp. 493–501. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30000-5_61
23. Seetharaman A., Patwa N., Saravanan A.S. et al. (2018). Disrupting Digital Future of Product Lifecycle. International Journal of Management and Sustainability, no. 7, pp. 32–42. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.11.32.71.2018.42
24. Shaidullin A.I. (2023). The problem of interpretation, differentiation and classification of digital products. Business Informatics, no. 17 (2), pp. 55–70. https://doi.org/10.17323/2587814X.2023.2.55.70
25. Statista. (2025). Digital Commerce. Statista Inc. URL: https://www.statista.com/outlook/fmo/digital-payments/digital-commerce/worldwide#users
26. Subramoniam R., Sundin E., Subramoniam S. et al. (2021). Riding the Digital Product Life Cycle Waves towards a Circular Economy. Sustainability, no. 13 (8), 8960. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168960
27. Tapscott D., Tapscott A. (2016). Blockchain Revolution: How the Technology Behind Bitcoin Is Changing Money. Business and the World. New York Penguin.
28. Ulrich K.T., Eppinger S.D. (2015). Product Design and Development. 6th ed. Город: McGraw-Hill Education.
29. Vernon R. (1966). International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, no. 80 (2), pp. 190–207. https://doi.org/10.2307/1880689
30. Wang Y., Kung L., Byrd T.A. (2018). Big Data Analytics: Understanding Its Capabilities and Potential Benefits for Healthcare Organizations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, no. 126, pp. 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.019
Review
For citations:
Izmailova A.A., Budrin A.G. The Impact of Digital Product Type on the Product Lifecycle. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2025;28(3):54-63. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2025-28(3)-54-63. EDN: XXJTVV