Preview

Economics of Contemporary Russia

Advanced search

The impact of aesthetic factors on labor productivity

https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2025-28(1)-34-46

EDN: HGZBVB

Abstract

The subject of study is the mechanism of influence of aesthetic factor on job contentment and attitude to labor. The object of study is the socio-­cultural sphere of the enterprise in the context of its interaction with other subsystems. The purpose of the article is a theoretical and methodological generalization of the results of the empirical analysis carried out during testing the hypothesis of the significance of the emotions in the labor productivity. The research touches upon issues of economics, sociology, cultural studies, axiology and other disciplines. The main conclusions were obtained around their intersection. The relevance of the study is due to the fundamental uncertainty of labor efficiency problems at the corporate level. The supposed scientific novelty lies in the formulation and empirical verification of the mechanism of influence of the aesthetic perception on labor efficiency. The work was based on empirical data obtained in a longitudinal study conducted in 2001–2003 at a manufacturing enterprise implementing anti-crisis measures. Thus, the article contains both methodological generalizations and a description of the specific experience of their application. The main research methods were closed and open questionnaire surveys, focus groups, as well as numerical interpretation of expert opinions. An empirical analysis of labor productivity dynamics and labor attitudes in all professional groups revealed a sustainable effect of aesthetic actions on a change for the better in the emotional attitude to work and a positive revaluation of employee expectations. The following results were obtained during the study: a model for correcting attitudes to labor through aesthetic influences was developed; the conditions for achieving effectiveness and the limitations of the proposed approach were determined.

About the Author

Fyodor V. Stryutskiy
Samara
Russian Federation

consultant on organization and management of production complexes



References

1. Algan Y., Cahuc P. (2011). Inherited Trust and Growth. American Economic Review, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 617–623 (in Russ.)

2. Weber M. (2021). Protestant ethics and the spirit of capitalism Transl. from Germ. by M. Levina. Moscow: AST. 350 p. (in Russ.)

3. Hartmann N. (2002). Ethics. Transl. from Germ. by A.V. Glagolev. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dahl. 712 p. (in Russ.)

4. Zhdanov D.A. (2003). System-­oriented modeling of the real sector of the Russian mesoeconomics. Moscow: Scientific Library. 256 p. (in Russ.)

5. Ivanova T. Yu. Rasskazova E.I., Osin E.N. (2012). Structure and diagnostic of job satisfaction: Development and approbation. Organizational Psychology, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 2–15 (in Russ.) URL: http://orgpsyjournal.hse.ru/2012-3/62021308.html

6. Inglehart R. (2018). Cultural Evolution, People’s Motivations are Changing, and Reshaping the World. Transl. from Eng. by S.L. Lopatina. Moscow: Mysl. 347 p. (in Russ.)

7. Kahneman D. (2014). Thinking, Fast and Slow / Transl. from Engl. by A. Andreev. Moscow: AST. 653 p. (in Russ.)

8. Kasavin I.T. (2008). Text. The discourse. The context. Introduction to the social epistemology of language. Moscow: Canon+. 437 p. (in Russ.)

9. Kleiner G.B. (2022). Social leadership, power splitting, and inclusive management of the organization. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 4, pp. 26–44 (in Russ.)

10. Lotman Y.M. (2002). Canonical Art as an Information Paradox. Articles on the semiotics of culture and art. St. Petersburg: Academic Project. P. 314–321 (in Russ.)

11. McLuhan M. (2007). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Moscow: Kuchkovo Pole. 464 p. (in Russ.)

12. Polterovich V.M. (2001). Transplantation of economic institutions. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3, pp. 24–50 (in Russ.)

13. Rapoport A.B. (1997). Unity in Diversity – ​the Legacy of European Culture. Systems research. Methodological problems, no. 25, pp. 50–54 (in Russ.)

14. Smirnova A.Yu. (2019). Dynamics of labor attitudes in a situation of threat of job loss. Organizational Psychology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 8–31 (in Russ.)

15. Throsby D. (2018). Economics and Culture. Transl. from Engl. by I. Kushnareva. Moscow: HSE Publishing house. 368 p. (in Russ.)

16. Huntington S. (2014). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. Transl. from Engl. by T. Velimeev. Moscow: AST. 571 p. (in Russ.)

17. Aesthetics (1989). Aesthetics: A dictionary. Gen. ed. Belyaev A.A. Moscow: Politizdat. 445 p. (in Russ.)

18. Goldthorpe J. (1998). Rational action theory for sociology. Britain Journal of Sociology, vol. 49, no. 2,

19. pp. 167–189.

20. Hofstede G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications.

21. 568 p.

22. Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Pedersen P.B. (2002). Exploring culture: Exercises, stories, and synthetic cultures. L.: Hachette (UK). 256 p.


Review

For citations:


Stryutskiy F.V. The impact of aesthetic factors on labor productivity. Economics of Contemporary Russia. 2025;28(1):34-46. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.33293/1609-1442-2025-28(1)-34-46. EDN: HGZBVB

Views: 368


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1609-1442 (Print)
ISSN 2618-8996 (Online)