Human in Economics and Human Economics

The paper examines the problems of anthropogenesis in the light of the system paradigm. The purpose of the study is to improve the tools of system economics. As a hypothesis, the author formulates provisions according to which there is a balance between man and the real world created by him. The subject of the study is the conditions of anthropogenesis in various socio- economic systems. For this purpose, the author considers knowledge as an immaterial force in the processes of material transformation. The topic of subjectivity, the conditions of assembly and disintegration of the whole into parts, in which man acts as a super- complex quantum-mechanical observer of complexity, included in the synergistic flow of interweaving, are studied in detail. The method of synthesis of the systemic representation of the world and the provisions of the systemic economy, which is the main one in the work, allowed to formulate methodological additions for future economic research. In particular, a theoretical statement is developed that provides for the leveling of methodological subjectivism in the design of economic reality by a tetrad representation. The emerging term «tetrad thinking» is proposed to be used in scientific circulation together with the Man remaining in the economy and moving in a synergistic flow of increasing complexity. The above acts as a scientific novelty for this work. The author's view of spatio-temporal sweeps implies the presence of their center –  a person who reflects and makes a choice. Human activity in the economy is analyzed from the standpoint of various types of scientific rationality. The «human» component is determined in the formation of new spatio-temporal «windows». The assertion about the insufficiency of the transfer of one information component in evolutionary theories is substantiated –  the human ability to process chaos is also required not only in the creation of new economic worlds, but also in overcoming the anti-entropic leap in the existing hyper-complicated world. The provisions proposed in the work, aimed at improving the tools of the system economy, are limited by the breadth of the cognitive subject in economic reality. This creates prospects for further developments to search for the interrelations of knowledge forms with the boundaries of socio-economic systems and their stability.

1. Avtonomov V. S. (2020). Who, How, and Why Rejects Economic Theories in Economic Theories in Space and Time. Ed. by Avtonomov V. S., Rubinstein A.Ya. St. Petersburg: Aletheia. 360 p. P. 12–30 (in Russian).

2. Aganbegyan A. G. (2020). The second phase of the corona crisis in Russia: Tasks and possibilities of overcoming it. Report on the 35th anniversary of the IEF RAS from 11.17.2020. Moscow: IEF RAS (in Russian).

3. Antipenko L. G. (2006). Quantum computer and quantum brain. Artificial intelligence: An interdisciplinary approach. Ed. by Dubrovsky D. I., Lektorsky V. A. Moscow: InteLL. 448 p. P. 111–126 (in Russian).

4. Arshinov V. I., Budanov V. G. (2022). Becoming of the methodology of complex-­semiotic thinking in dialogue with quantum mechanics. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 8, pp. 77–85 (in Russian).

5. Arshinov V. I., Svirsky Ya.I. (2022). Challenges of the Anthropocene and Artificial Intelligence in the Era of Civilizational Transit // Anthropomericity as a Challenge and Response of Modernity. Ed. by V. G. Budanov. Kursk: Publishing House of ZAO «Universitetskaya Kniga». 309 p. Pp. 99–120 (in Russian).

6. Arshinov V. I., Svirsky Ya.I. (2021). Rethinking anthropocentrism in the optics of the complexity paradigm. Problems of human transformation in the context of the crisis of technogenic civilization. Ed. by Budanov V. G. Kursk: Publishing house of ZAO «Universitetskaya Kniga». 287 p. P. 75–143. (in Russian).

7. Arshinov V. I., Svirsky Ya.I. (2015). Complexity world and its observer. Philosophy of Science and Technology, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 70–84 (in Russian).

8. Budanov V. G. (2021). The Beginning of the Great Anthropological Transition. The Problem of Human Transformation in the Conditions of the Crisis of Technogenic Civilization. Collection of scientific articles. Ed. by V. G. Budanov. Kursk: Publishing House of ZAO «University Book». 287 p. Pp. 6–19 (in Russian).

9. Bourgeois Ideologists (1968). Bourgeois Ideologists on the 50th Anniversary of Soviet Power. Iss. 2. Moscow: Progress. 386 p. (in Russian).

10. Biryukov B. V., Trostnikov V. N. (2009). The Heat of Cold Numbers and the Pathos of Dispassionate Logic: Formalization of Thinking from Ancient Times to the Age of Cybernetics. 4th ed. Moscow: LIBROKOM. 232 p. (in Russian).

11. Burov V. G. (2019a). Where is Russia heading: a view from China through the pages of the book: Guo Li-shuang. Dandai yelosy shehui sichao yanjiu [Study of social ideas in modern Russia] // Voprosy Filosofii, no. 11, pp. 78–89 (in Russian).

12. Burov V. G. (2019). Creative approach to Marxism. Free Thought, no. 6 (1678), pp. 85–96 (in Russian).

13. Varakin D. N. (2023). On Approaches to Designing a “Vivid” Economy. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 2 (101), pp. 31–48 (in Russian).

14. Varakin D. N. (2023). What is Stable Knowledge? AlterEconomics, no. 20 (1), 127–151. (in Russian).

15. Varakin D. N. (2021). Knowledge economy and organization. Moscow: Ekonomika. 335 p. (in Russian).

16. Weber M. (1990). Politics as a Vocation and Profession. Selected Works. Trans. from Germ.; compiled, general editorship and afterword by Davydova Yu.N.; foreword by Gaidenko P. P. Moscow: Progress. 808 p. (in Russian).

17. Vedenov M. F. (1965). Problems of studying systems and structures. Materials of the Conference. Ed. Board: Vedenov M. F. et al. Moscow: Central Bureau of Philosophical (Methodological) Seminars of the USSR Academy of Sciences. 232 p. (in Russian).

18. Vernadsky V. I. (1978). Vivid substance. Moscow: Nauka. 358 p. (in Russian).

19. Wiener N. (1958). Cybernetics and Society. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publishing House. 215 p. (in Russian).

20. Wiener N. (1961). Science and Society. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 7, pp. 117–122 (in Russian).

21. Vinogrodsky B. (2018). Main areas of knowledge in the traditional Chinese worldview. Official channel of Nazarbayev University on YouTube: Nazarbayev University Official. 21.02.2018 (in Russian). URL: www.youtube.com/watch?v=NZFYiak03aw

22. Hegel G. W.F. (1956). Die Phanomenologie des Geistes. Works. Vol. 4. Moscow: Mysl. 440 p. (in Russian).

23. Gerasimova I. A. (2021). Methodology of experimental research. Francis Bacon and the science of technogenic civilization. The problem of human transformation in the conditions of the crisis of technogenic civilization. Collection of scientific articles. Ed. by V. G. Budanov. Kursk: Publishing house of ZAO «Universitetskaya Kniga». 287 p. Pp. 199–224 (in Russian).

24. Glazyev S.Yu. (2021). Noonomics as the core of the formation of a new technological and world economic order. A(O)ntology of Noonomics. Under the gen. ed. by Bodrunov S. D. St. Petersburg: Noonomy and Noosociety. Almanac of Scientific Works of the S. Y. Witte INID. Pp. 93–131 (in Russian).

25. Kapitsa S. P. (2022). Essay on the Theory of Human Growth: Demographic Revolution and Information Society. Moscow: URSS. 128 p. (in Russian).

26. Kara-­Murza S. G. (2003). Undermining rational thinking and reflexive management. Reflexive Processes and Management, no. 2, vol. 3, pp. 16–34 (in Russian).

27. Kedrov B. M. (1971). Development of forms of connection between science and technology. The process of transformation of science into a direct productive force. Ed. by Shukhardin S. V. Moscow: Nauka. 127 p. (in Russian).

28. Kedrov B. M. (1977). Social and biological in scientific creativity. Biological and social in human development. Moscow: Nauka. P. 139–151. (in Russian).

29. Kleiner G. B. (2004). Nanoeconomics. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 12, pp. 70–93 (in Russian).

30. Kleiner G. B. (2016). Economy. Mathematics. Modeling. Selected Works. Moscow: CEMI RAS. 856 p. (in Russian).

31. Kolodko G. V. (2021). Janos Kornai and his significant works. In memory of the scientist. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 11, pp. 151–159 (in Russian).

32. Kurdyumov S. P. (1989). Laws of evolution and self-organization of complex systems. Philosophical aspects of informatization: seminar proceedings, pp. 61–82. Moscow: All-­Russian Research Institute of Systems Research (in Russian).

33. Laszlo E. (2011). The Theory of the Integrity of the Universe: Science and the Akashic Field (Quantum Magic). St. Petersburg: Ves’. 160 p. (in Russian).

34. Lektorsky V. A., Sadovsky V. N. (1960). On the principles of systems research. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 8, pp. 67–79 (in Russian).

35. Lektorsky V. A. (2006). Philosophy, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Science. Artificial Intelligence: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Ed. by Dubrovsky D. I., Lektorsky V. A. Moscow: IInteLL. 448 p. Pp. 12–21 (in Russian).

36. Lenin V. I. (1970). The complete works: in 55 vols., vol. 10, 43. Moscow: Political Literature Publishing House (in Russian).

37. Lepskiy V. E. (2021). Prospects of a Technogenic Civilization. Subjectivity in a Technogenic Civilization. The Problem of Human Transformation in the Conditions of the Crisis of a Technogenic Civilization. Collection of scientific articles. Ed. by V. G. Budanov. Kursk: Publishing House of ZAO «Universitetskaya kniga». 287 p. Pp. 67–74 (in Russian).

38. Losev A. F. (1994). History of ancient aesthetics: results of a thousand-year development. In 2 books. Book 2. Moscow: Iskusstvo (Art). 604 p. (in Russian).

39. Lukyanov A. E. (2020). Lao Tzu and Confucius: Philosophy of Tao. Moscow: Publishing company “Oriental Literature RAS”. 384 pp. (in Russian).

40. Makarov V. L. (2006). Knowledge Economy as a Sociocultural Phenomenon. (Series “Philosophical Panorama of the Beginning of the 21st Century”). Moscow: RASS Publishing House. 30 p. (in Russian).

41. Makarov V. L., Kleiner G. B. (2007). Microeconomics of Knowledge. Moscow: Ekonomika. 204 p. (in Russian).

42. Mamchur E. A. (2010). Concepts of global evolutionism: arguments «for» and «against». Selected works: Heritage and modernity. In 3 vol. Vol. 3. Philosophical ontology today. Scientific articles. Moscow: Savin S. A., pp. 152–170 (in Russian).

43. Marx K., Engels F. (1955). Works. 2nd ed. Vol. 2, 3, 20, 21, 30. Moscow: State Publishing House of Political Literature (in Russian).

44. Melik-­Gaikazyan I. V. (2011). Laws of information. Coll. of Sc. Works: Synergetic paradigm. «Synergetics of innovative complexity». Moscow: Progress-­Tradition. 496 p. Pp. 464–479 (in Russian).

45. Moiseev N. N. (1993). Ascent to Reason. Lectures on Universal Evolutionism and Its Applications. Moscow: IzdA T. 192 p. (in Russian).

46. Moiseev N. (1994). Morality and the Phenomenon of Evolution. Ecological Imperative and Ethics of the 21st Century. Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 6, pp. 131–139 (in Russian).

47. Knight F. (2012). Economic and Human Activity. Philosophy of Economics. Ed. by D. Hausman. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press. 510 p. pp. 124–133 (in Russian).

48. Novik I. B. (1994). Main problems of systems methodology. Part 1. Moscow: ISA RAS. 64 p. (in Russian).

49. Novik I. B. (1969). Philosophical ideas of Lenin and cybernetics. Moscow: Znanie. 48 p. (in Russian).

50. Ostrovitjanov Yu.K. (1969). Post-industrial civilization or capitalism in 2000? Voprosy Filosofii, no. 7, pp. 30–41 (in Russian).

51. Polterovich V. M. (2023). Author's capital and reforming the Russian publishing system. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 6, pp. 138–158 (in Russian).

52. Rozin V. M. (2021). Man in the era of change and crisis of technogenic civilization. The problem of human transformation in the conditions of crisis of technogenic civilization. Collection of scientific articles. Ed. by V. G. Budanov. Kursk: Publishing house of ZAO «Universitetskaya Kniga». 287 p. Pp. 20–36 (in Russian).

53. Sorokin D. E. (2019). Microeconomic approaches to explanation in Missed chance or the last valve? Moscow: KNORUS. 352 p. P. 120–126 (in Russian).

54. Sorokin D. E. (2015). The Role of the Innovative Entrepreneur in Reindustrialization. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 2 (44), pp. 32–33 (in Russian).

55. Smirnov A. V. (2021). Current tasks of Russian philosophy. Report presented to the meeting of the seminar on the topic «Russian project of civilizational development» on February 10, 2021. Moscow: IF RAS (in Russian). URL: https://iphras.ru/page25149611.htm

56. Smolin O. (2021). Contradictions of Technological and Socioeconomic Transformations: The New Role of Knowledge in the Process of Moving Towards Noonomics. A(O)ntology of Noono­mics: The Fourth Technological Revolution and Its Economic, Social, and Humanitarian Consequences. Ed. by Bodrunov S. D. St. Petersburg: S. Y. Witte INID, pp. 158–177 (in Russian).

57. Spirkin A. G. (1961). On the nature of consciousness. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 6, pp. 118–127 (in Russian).

58. Stepin V. S. (2003). Self-developing systems and post-non-classical rationality. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 8, pp. 5–17 (in Russian).

59. Stepin V. S. (2011). Historical types of scientific rationality in their relation to the problem of complexity. Synergetic paradigm. “Synergetics of innovative complexity”. Moscow: Progress-­Tradition. 496 p. P. 37–46 (in Russian).

60. Stepin V. S. (2015). Philosophy and Methodology of Science. Moscow: Academic Project. 716 p. (in Russian).

61. Sukharev O. S. (2008). Theory of Economic Growth and Evolution of Technical Systems. Theory of Evolution of Socio-­Economic Systems. Ed. by Academician A. I. Tatarkin, Academician V. I. Maevsky. Moscow: Ekonomika. 694 p. Pp. 73–91 (in Russian).

62. Tyukhtin V. S. (1988). Dialectics of knowledge of complex systems. Ed. by Tyukhtin V. S. Moscow: Mysl. 316 p. (in Russian).

63. Ursul A. D. (2015). The phenomenon of the noosphere: Global evolution and noospherogenesis. M.: LENAND. 336 pp. (in Russian).

64. Forrester D. (1978). World Dynamics. Moscow: Nauka. 168 p. (in Russian).

65. Frolov I. T., Gvishiani D. M. et al. (1987). Socialism and the Progress of Humanity: Global Problems of Civilization. Ed. by I. T. Frolov. Moscow: Politizdat. 447 p. (in Russian).

66. Hayek F. (2003). The claims of knowledge. Voprosy Filosofii, no. 1, pp. 168–176 (in Russian).

67. Hayek F. (2010). The Road to Serfdom. Trans. from Engl. by M. Gnedovsky. Moscow: AST; Astrel. 317 p. (in Russian).

68. Shklovsky I. S. (1976). Universe, life, mind. 4th ed. Moscow: Nauka. 368 p. (in Russian).

69. Shreyder Yu.A. (1988). Information and knowledge. System concept of information processes: Collection of works. Iss. 3. Moscow: RIO VNIISI, pp. 47–52 (in Russian).

70. Yuryev A. I. (2019). On the monograph of the Academy of A. G. Aganbegyan «On the priorities of social policy». Moscow University Bulletin. Ser. 12. Political Sciences, no. 3, pp. 113–120 (in Russian).

71. Yakovlev A. N. (2001). Bolshevism – ​social disease of the 20th century. The Black Book of Communism. Ed. by N.Yu. Syromyatnikov. Moscow: Three Centuries of History. 768 p. Pp. 5–32 (in Russian).

72. Cohen M. K., Hutter M., Osborne M. A. (2022). Advanced artificial agents intervene in the provision of reward. AI Magazine, no. 43, pp. 282–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/aaai.12064.

73. Xiaoqian Li, Quin Yow W. (2023). Younger, not older, children trust an inaccurate human informant more than an inaccurate robot informant. Child Development. doi.org/10.1111/cdev.14048.

74.