Differential equations of input–output balance: digitization and the prospect of application

Impacts on the structure of the economy are efforts aimed at changing its properties. These efforts can be used to solve various tasks, for example, for technological renewal, economic diversification, etc. One of the main goals of structural reforms in the Russian economy will remain for a long time a purposeful synthesis of such its own/internal/structural dynamic properties that, in the absence of resource constraints or even with minimally sufficient resources, would ensure self-sustaining aperiodic economic growth and smoothing business cycles. An analysis of publications on this issue over the past 20 years indicates an increase in activity in different countries aimed at finding new solutions for the formation and implementation of structural policies. The uneven development and general uncertainty of recent times have expanded the range of these countries and multiplied approaches to the development of structural policies. In this regard, we note the growing relevance of creating new tools and methods for analyzing the effectiveness of such a policy. This is reinforced by the fact that even the implementation of minimal structural policy measures based on proven approaches and solutions is fraught with miscalculations and mistakes. The responsibilities of the management circuit include an adequate response to errors, drawing conclusions from them and correcting economic behavior, up to the complete cessation of certain measures and programs. For the study of economic systems, the best possible tools are differential equations and methods of their analysis. We turn to the dynamic model of input-output balance, formalized by such equations, the author's method of its digitization and the theory of its own dynamic properties of economic systems. The purpose of the work is to improve the tools for analyzing structural policy based on the independent application of this input-output model, as well as by including it in large research computing complexes being developed at the CEMI RAS, IEF RAS and other large scientific centers. The aim of the study is to adapt the dynamic input-output balance for the analysis of structural policy. The result of the work: the author's instrumental approach, which was not previously used for the development and analysis of structural policy.

1. Aksyanova A. V. (2011). Evaluation of the efficiency of the reproduction and functional structure of the regional economy. Economics, Statistics and Informatics. Bulletin of the UMO, no. 2, pp. 149–153 (in Russian).

2. Buklemishev O. V. (2023). “Structural transformation” of the Russian economy and economic policy. Studies on Russian Economic Development, no. 4 (199), pp. 42–53 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.47711/0868-6351-199-42-53

3. Glaz’yev S.Y. (2016). The economy of the future. Does Russia have a chance? Moscow: Knizhnyy mir Publ. 640 p. (in Russian).

4. Dolyatovskii V. A., Grechko M. V. (2018). Modeling of the mechanisms of behavior of economic agents. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, vol. 17, no. 10 (481), pp. 1835–1848 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.17.10.1835

5. Domozhirov D. A., Ibragimov N. M., Melnikova L. V., Tsyplakov A. A. (2017). Integrating an input-output approach into agent-based modeling. Part 1. Methodological foundations. World of Economics and Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 86–99 (in Russian).

6. Egorova M. S. (2013). Technological innovations as the basis for changing the technological structure of the economy. Management of Economic Systems: Scientific Electronic Journal, no. 10 (58) (in Russian). URL: http://uecs.ru/uecs58-582013/item/2419-2013-10-11-07-04-58

7. Ivanter V. V. (2017). Structural and investment policy for ensuring economic growth in Russia: monograph. Moscow, Scientific Consultant Publ. 196 p. (in Russian).

8. Leontief V. V. (1990). Economic essays. Theories, research, facts and policy. Moscow: Political Literature. 415 p. (in Russian).

9. Makarov, V.L., Bakhtizin A. R., Sulakshin S. S. (2007). The application of computable models in public administration Moscow, Scientific Expert Publ. 304 p. (in Russian).

10. Elvira Nabiullina’s speech at joint meeting of State Duma dedicated committees on Bank of Russia’s 2021 Annual Report (in Russian). URL: http://cbr.ru/press/event/?id=12824

11. NRU HSE (2018). Structural changes in the Russian economy and structural policy. Analytical report. Under the scientific supervision of acad. Yasin E. G. Moscow: NRU HSE (in Russian).

12. Pankova S. V., Popov V. V. (2016). Modeling the influence of the dynamics of the structure of mutual trade on the development of the economic potential of the Russian Federation. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, no. 12 (459), pp. 4–13 (in Russian).

13. Pozamantir E. I. (2014). Computable General equilibrium of the economy and transport (Transport in a dynamic inter-industry balance). Moscow, POLI PRINT SERVIS Publ. 160 p. (in Russian).

14. Reshetova U. R. (2019). Analysis of the structure of the Russian economy at the present stage. Scientific Review. Economic Sciences, no. 3, pp. 26–30 (in Russian).

15. Suvorov N. V., Treschina S. V., Beletsky Y. V. (2017). Balance and factor models as a tool for analy­zing and forecasting the structure of the economy. Scientific works: Institute of National Economic Forecasting, RAS, vol. 15, pp. 50–75. Moscow: MAKS Press (in Russian).

16. Suslov V. I., Domozhirov D. A., Ibragimov N. M., Kostin V. S., Mel’nikova L.V., Tsyplakov A. A. (2016). Agent-based multi-regional input-output model of the Russian economy. Economics and Mathematical Methods, vol. 52, no 1. pp. 112–131 (in Russian).

17. Suslov V. I., Novikova T. S., Tsyplakov A. A. (2016). Modeling the role of the state in a spatial agent-based mode. Economy of Region, vol. 12, no. 3. pp. 951–965 (in Russian).

18. Toroptsev E. L., Gudieva N. G. (2023). Current state of interindustrial research. Engineer of the present and future: practice and prospects for the development of partnerships in higher technical education: Materials of the XVIII All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation. Donetsk. Ed. by L. A. Kukushkina. Donetsk: DonNTU Publishing House (in Russian).

19. Toroptsev E. L., Marakhovskii A. S. (2022). Analysis of macrostructural dynamics framed by the “input–output” methodology. Journal of the New Economic Association, no. 1 (53), pp. 12–30 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.31737/2221-2264-2022-53-1-1

20. Toroptsev E. L., Marakhovskii A. S. (2022). Structural inertia of economic systems. Economics and Mathematical Methods, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 38–47 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.31857/S042473880016564-9

21. Torop­tsev E. L., Marakhovskii A. S., Duszynski R. R. (2019). Theoretical framework for a set of equilibrium and input-output models development. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 427–446 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.18.3.427

22. Toroptsev E. L., Marakhovskii A. S., Duszynski R. R. (2020). Intersectoral modeling of transients. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, vol. 19, iss. 3, pp. 564–585 (in Russian). URL: https://doi.org/10.24891/ea.19.3.564

23. Toropcev E. L., Tatochenko T. V. (2011). Theoretical bases management modernization and economic growth. Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 2–11 (in Russian).

24. Uzyakova E. S., Uzyakov R. M. (2018). Analysis of the influence of scientific and technological development on economic growth using inter-industry balance tools. Studies on Russian Economic Development, no. 6, pp. 82–92 (in Russian). URL: https://ecfor.ru/wpcontent/uploads/2019/04/analiz-vliyaniya-nauchno tehnicheskogo-razvitiya-na-ekonomicheskij-rost-s-ispolzovaniem-mob.pdf

25. Forsyth J., Malcolm M., Moler K. (1980). Machine methods of mathematical computation. Moscow: Mir. 276 p. (in Russian).

26. Shirov A. A. (2018). Transformation of the structure of the economy: mechanisms and management: monograph. Institute of National Economic Forecasting of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Moscow, MAKS Press Publ. 263 p. (in Russian).

27. Shirov A. A., Sayapova A. R., Yantovsky A. A. (2015). Integrated intersectoral balance as an element of analysis and forecasting of connections in the post-Soviet space. Studies on Russian Economic Development, no. 1, pp. 11–22 (in Russian). URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/integrirovannyy-mezhotraslevoy-balans-kak-element-analiza-i-prognozirovaniya-svyazey-na-postsovetskom-prostranstve

28. Célestin Monga, Yifu Lin Justin (eds) (2019). The Oxford Handbook of Structural Transformation. Oxford Hand-books. Oxford Academic. 742 р. URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198793847.001.0001

29. Rodrik D. (2016). Premature deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Growth, vol. 21, pp. 1–33.

30. Stiglitz J.E. (2017). Structural Transformation, Deep Downturns, and Government Policy. NBER Working Paper, no. 23794.

31. UNIDO (2009). Industrial Development Report. In: Breaking In and Moving Up: New Industrial Challenges for the Bottom Billion and the Middle-Income Countries. UNIDO. 146 p. URL: https://

32. www.unido.org/sites/default/files/2009-02/IDR_2009_print_0.PDF

33.