<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ecr-journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Экономическая наука современной России</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics of Contemporary Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1609-1442</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-8996</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33293/1609-1442-2023-3(102)-66-76</article-id><article-id custom-type="edn" pub-id-type="custom">UYGZOK</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ecr-journal-908</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ ТЕОРИИ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>«Новая экономическая реальность» как промежуточная фаза развития между капиталистическим и ассоциированным способами производства</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>«New economic reality» as an intermediate phase of development between capitalist and associated modes of production</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1463-7646</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Чиканова</surname><given-names>Елена Сергеевна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Chikanova</surname><given-names>Elena S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>к.э.н., доцент кафедры экономики, бухгалтерского учета и аудита, докторант </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">echikanova@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3744-0950</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Брижак</surname><given-names>Ольга Валентиновна</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Brizhak</surname><given-names>Olga V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>доктор экономических наук, профессор</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">brizhak71@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-2"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Краснодарский университет МВД РФ, Краснодар;&#13;
Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации, Москва</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Federation; Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><aff-alternatives id="aff-2"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской̆ Федерации, Москва</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2023</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2023</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>66</fpage><lpage>76</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Чиканова Е.С., Брижак О.В., 2023</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2023</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Чиканова Е.С., Брижак О.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Chikanova E.S., Brizhak O.V.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/908">https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/908</self-uri><abstract><p>В ответ на появление качественно новых феноменов общественно-хозяйственной жизни экономическая теория получает импульсы обновления и модернизируется. Среди таких явлений – новая экономическая реальность. Ее масштабы, сложность, а также насыщенность острыми противоречиями предопределяют трудности ее теоретической интерпретации и существенные различия в трактовках ее содержания. Вместе с тем, особенности новой экономической реальности обусловливают необходимость в привлечении к ее теоретическому исследованию познавательных возможностей теории способов производства. Привлекая такие возможности, авторы приходят к выводу о том, что новая экономическая реальность представляет собой особую фазу в поступательном движении капиталистического способа производства. Граница такой фазы задана переходом порога меры в накоплении не обеспеченных адекватными решениями проблем, порожденных длительными и глубокими технологическими сдвигами и социально-экономическими преобразованиями. Новая экономическая реальность возникает в процессе трансформации системы капиталистического способа производства, в рамках которой интенсивно создаются и накапливаются предпосылки ассоциированного способа производства. Формирование специальной теории новой экономической реальности, способной интерпретировать множество фактов, характерных для различных аспектов соответствующего феномена, дает возможность построить целостную картину особой фазы развития капиталистического способа производства. Проведенное авторами исследование сфокусировано на: определении специальной предметной области данной теории в общем пространстве эволюции экономической теории; разработке метода ее исследования, обеспечивающего потребности ее формирования и развития. В статье содержатся практические рекомендации, направленные на реализацию познавательного потенциала теории новой экономической реальности. Основные результаты проведенного нами теоретического исследования принадлежат к одному из новых направлений развития экономической теории, что предопределяет дискуссионный характер полученных авторами концептуальных положений, итоговых выводов и практических рекомендаций. В процессе исследования использованы возможности диалектического метода, современных версий системного и эволюционного подходов, а также ресурсы ряда теорий: способа производства; капитала; социально-экономических трансформаций; персонификации экономических отношений; порога меры в развитии явления.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The emergence of qualitatively new phenomena of social and economic life, economic theory receives impulses of its renewal and is being modernized. Among such phenomena are the new economic reality, its scale, complexity, as well as the saturation of acute contradictions predetermine the difficulties of its theoretical interpretation and significant differences in the interpretations of its content. At the same time, these peculiarities of the new economic reality make necessary to attract to its theoretical study the cognitive possibilities of the theory of modes of production. Drawing on such opportunities, the authors come to the conclusion that the new economic reality represents a special phase in the progressive movement of the capitalist mode of production. The boundary of such a phase is set by the transition of the threshold of measures in the accumulation of problems that are not provided with adequate solutions, generated by long and deep technological shifts, as well as related socio-economic transformations. A new economic reality arises in the process of transformation of the system of the capitalist mode of production, within which the prerequisites of the associated mode of production are intensively created and accumulated. The formation of a special theory of a new economic reality capable of interpreting a variety of factors characteristic of various aspects of the corresponding phenomenon makes possible to build a holistic picture of a special phase of the development of the capitalist mode of production system, as well as to develop applied tools that are in demand in the process of regulating the most important processes of this phase. The research conducted by the authors is focused on: defining a special subject area of the specified theory in the general space of the evolution of economic theory; developing a method of its research, providing the needs of its formation and development. The article contains practical recommendations for realizing the cognitive potential of the theory of new economic reality. The main results of the theoretical study carried out belong to one of the new directions in the development of economic theory, which predetermines the debatable nature of the conceptual provisions, final conclusions and practical recommendations received by the authors. In the process of research, the possibilities of the dialectical method, modern versions of the systemic and evolutionary approaches, as well as the resources of a number of theories were realized: the mode of production; capital; socio-economic transformations; personification of economic relations; threshold measures in the development of the phenomenon.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>новая экономическая реальность</kwd><kwd>переходная фаза</kwd><kwd>капиталистический способ производства</kwd><kwd>ассоциированный способ производства</kwd><kwd>социально-экономические трансформации</kwd><kwd>диалек-тический метод</kwd><kwd>системный подход</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>new economic reality</kwd><kwd>system of capitalist mode of production</kwd><kwd>transitional phase</kwd><kwd>associated mode of production</kwd><kwd>socio-economic transformations</kwd><kwd>dialectical method</kwd><kwd>systemic approach</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Агеев А. А., Логинов Е. Л. (2016). Россия в новой экономической реальности. М.: Институт экономических стратегий. 216 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ageev A. A., Loginov E. L. (2016). Russia in the new economic reality. Moscow: Institute of Economic Strategies. 216 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Батищев Г. С. (1997). Введение в диалектику творчества. М.: Изд-во Русского Христианского гуманитарного института. 376 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Batishchev G. S. (1997). Introduction to the dialectic of creativity. Moscow: Publishing House of the Russian Christian Humanitarian Institute. 376 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бодрунов С. Д. (2014). Российская экономическая система: будущее современного высокотехнологичного производства // Экономическое возрождение России. № 2 (40). С. 5–16.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bodrunov S. D. (2014). The Russian economic system: the future of modern high-tech production. The Economic Revival of Russia, no. 2 (40), pp. 5–16 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Брижак О. В. (2021). Институциональные ловушки развития креативного потенциала корпорации // Экономическая наука современной России. № 3 (94). С. 87–96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brizhak O. V. (2021). Institutional traps in the development of a corporation's creative potential. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 3 (94), pp. 87–96 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Брижак О. В., Чиканова Е. С. (2023). Феномен задолженности перед будущими поколениями в контексте новой экономической реальности // Российский экономический журнал. № 1. С. 97–109.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Brizhak O. V., Chikanova E. S. (2023). The phenomenon of debt to future generations in the context of the new economic reality. Russian Economic Journal, no. 1, pp. 97–109 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бузгалин А. В., Колганов А. И. (2003). Теория социально-экономических трансформаций. М.: УРСС. 215 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Buzgalin A. V., Kolganov A. I. (2003). Theory of socio-economic transformations. Moscow: URSS. 215 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Вернадский В. И. (1989). Биосфера и ноосфера. М.: Наука. 261 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Vernadsky V. I. (1989). Biosphere and noosphere. Moscow: Nauka. 261 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гэлбрейт Дж.К. (1976). Экономическая теория и цели общества. М.: Прогресс. 408 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Galbraith J. K. (1976). Economic theory and the goals of society. Moscow: Progress. 408 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Глазьев С. Ю. (2022). Тенденции и проблемы экономического развития России // Современная конкуренция. № 1. С. 14–28.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Glazyev S. Yu. (2022). Trends and problems of economic development of Russia. Journal of Modern Сompetition, no. 1, pp. 14–28 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Гершенкрон А. (2004). Экономическая отсталость в экономической перспективе. М.: НИУ ВШЭ. 312 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gershenkron A. (2004). Economic backwardness in the economic perspective. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. 312 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кирдина-Чэндлер С.Г. (2018). Западные и незападные институциональные модели во времени и пространстве // Вопросы теоретической экономики. № 1 (2). С. 73–88</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirdina-Chandler S.G. (2018). Western and non-Western institutional models in time and space. Questions of Theoretical Economics, no.1 (2), pp. 73–88 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клейнер Г. Б. (2017). От экономики «физических лиц» к системной экономике // Вопросы экономики. № 8. С. 13–24.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kleiner G. B. (2017). From the economy of «individuals» to the system economy. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 13–24 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Колганов А. И. (2019). Эволюция денег как момент эволюции финансового капитала // Вопросы экономики. № 8. С. 67–84.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kolganov A. I. (2019). Evolution of money as the moment of evolution of financial capital. Voprosy Ekonomiki, no. 8, pp. 67–84 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мамедов О. Ю. (2009). Экономическая тайна финансового кризиса – ​2008 // TERRA ECONOMICUS. Т. 7. № 1. С. 5–11.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mamedov O. Y. (2009). The economic mystery of the financial crisis – ​2008. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–11 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Маркс К. (1969). Капитал. Т. 3. // Маркс К., Энгельс Ф. Соч., 2-е изд. Т. 25. Ч. I. М.: Политиздат. 488 c.; Т. 25. Ч. II. 398 c. М.: Политиздат. 398 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Marx K. (1969). Capital. Vol. 3. // Marx K., Engels F. Works, 2nd ed. Vol. 25. Part I. Moscow: Politizdat. 488 p.; Vol. 25. Part 2. Moscow: Politizdat. 398 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Матвеева Л. Г., Чернова О. А. (2016). Российское импортозамещение в условиях «новой нормальности» // TERRA ECONOMICUS. Т. 14. № 2. С. 45–53.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Matveeva L. G., Chernova O. A. (2016). Russian import substitution in the conditions of «new normality». TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 45–53 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Норт Д. (2010). Понимание процесса экономических изменений. Перев. с англ. М.: Изд. дом ВШЭ. С. 55–59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">North D. (2010). Understanding the process of economic change. Moscow: HSE University Publishing House, pp. 55–59 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Нуреев Р. М. (2014). Развитие метода экономической теории // Мир новой экономики. № 3. С. 95–106.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nureyev R. M. (2014). Development of the method of economic theory. The World of the New Economy, no. 3, pp. 95–106 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рязанов В. Т. (2016). (Не)РеаЛьный капитаЛизм. Политэкономия кризиса и его последствия для мирового хозяйства и России. М.: Экономика. С. 54–68.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ryazanov V. T. (2016). (Not)Real capitalism. The political economy of the crisis and its consequences for the world economy and Russia. Moscow: Ekonomika. Pp. 54–68 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Стиглиц Дж.Ю. (2012). Цена неравенства. Чем расслоение общества грозит нашему будущему. Перев. с англ. М.: Эксмо. 176 с.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Stiglitz J. Y. (2012). The price of inequality. How the stratification of society threatens our future. Moscow: Eksmo, 176 p. (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burlingham B. (2016). Small Giants: Companies That Choose to Be Great Instead of Big. NY: Portfolio. 186 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burlingham B. (2016). Small Giants: Companies That Choose to Be Great Instead of Big. NY: Portfolio. 186 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jacobs M., Mazzucato M. (eds.) (2016). Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell. 224 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jacobs M., Mazzucato M. (eds.) (2016). Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell. 224 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lucas R. E., Jr. (2009). The Current Financial Crisis. – ​URL: http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/brian.barry/igm/ditella.pdf</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lucas R. E., Jr. (2009). The Current Financial Crisis. – ​URL: http://faculty.chicagobooth.edu/brian.barry/igm/ditella.pdf</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit24"><label>24</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Krugman P. (2017). On Economic Arrogance. The New York Times. 20.02.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Krugman P. (2017). On Economic Arrogance. The New York Times. 20.02.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit25"><label>25</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mintzberg H. (2019). Bedtime stories for managers: Farewell to Lofty Leadership. Welcome Engaging Management. Oakland, CA: Barrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. 114 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mintzberg H. (2019). Bedtime stories for managers: Farewell to Lofty Leadership. Welcome Engaging Management. Oakland, CA: Barrett-Koehler Publishers Inc. 114 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit26"><label>26</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Mises L. (1966). Human Action: a Treatise on Economics. 3rd rev. ed. Chicago: Contemporary Books Inc. 256 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mises L. (1966). Human Action: a Treatise on Economics. 3rd rev. ed. Chicago: Contemporary Books Inc. 256 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit27"><label>27</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roubini N. (2015). The unconventional truth. Project Syndicate. 03.02. Р. 8–14.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roubini N. (2015). The unconventional truth. Project Syndicate. 03.02. Р. 8–14.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit28"><label>28</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Skousen M. (2016). The Making of Modern Economics: The Lives and Ideas of the Great Thinkers. N.Y.: Routledge. 168 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Skousen M. (2016). The Making of Modern Economics: The Lives and Ideas of the Great Thinkers. N.Y.: Routledge. 168 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
