ecr-journalЭкономическая наука современной РоссииEconomics of Contemporary Russia1609-14422618-8996Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciencesecr-journal-81Research ArticleЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И ХОЗЯЙСТВЕННАЯ ПРАКТИКАECONOMICAL POLICY AND ECONOMICAL PRACTICEКомплементарность и замещение исследований и разработок в инновационной деятельности промышленных предприятийComplementarity and Substitution in Industrial R&D ActivityГоличенкоО. Г.GolichenkoO. G.golichenko@rambler.ruСамоволеваС. А.SamovolevaS. A.svetdao@yandex.ruЦЭМИ РАН, ВШЭ, МФТИRussian FederationЦЭМИ РАНRussian Federation20151403201803110125Copyright © Голиченко О.Г., Самоволева С.А., 20182018Голиченко О.Г., Самоволева С.А.Golichenko O.G., Samovoleva S.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/81

Исследование посвящено анализу предпочтений бизнеса при использовании внешних или внутренних источников исследований и разработок (ИиР). Данные предпочтения исследуются для предпринимательского сектора в целом. В качестве наиболее важных для бизнеса внешних источников ИиР принимаются сектор высшего образования и правительственный сектор. Предпочтения бизнеса в использовании собственных или внешних источников ИиР описываются с помощью эффектов комплементарности и замещения. В качестве меры изменений предпочтений бизнеса предлагается использовать сдвиги к преимущественному инвестированию предпринимательским сектором одного из данных источников ИиР. Комплементарность и замещение в использовании бизнесом источников ИиР исследуются для ряда стран, объединенных в две группы. Первая представляет собой европейские страны, занимающие лидирующие, средние и аутсайдерские позиции с точки зрения инновационного развития. Вторая группа, сформированная по такому же принципу, состоит из ряда стран БРИКС. В качестве лидера, задающего технологическую границу для БРИКС, во вторую группу включена Южная Корея. Возникновение эффектов анализируется с позиции действия факторов, называемых в работе первичными. К ним относятся: общая экономическая ситуация в стране; предпринимательская среда; прохождение страной определенной стадии технологического развития; государственная инновационная политика. Последнему фактору в работе уделяется особое внимание.

The paper proposes macro analysis of business preferences for using internal and external sources of research and development. These preferences are investigated for the business sector as a whole. The higher education and government sectors are taken as the most important external sources for business research and development (R&D). The actions of the business sector are considered in terms of choice of the composition of investment in its research and acquisition of external knowledge. This choice may have dynamic effects of substitution or complementarity. The paper introduces four primary factors that influence the behavior of business sector. That is the main subject of the study. These factors are: a stage of country’s development and economic situation, business conditions, efficacy and dimensions of impact of public policies on R&D. The work carries out cross-country comparisons of complementarity and substitution effects in the use of business R&D sources as well as the shifts in business preferences. The comparison has been made within two groups of countries for 2000-2010.

исследования и разработкиинвестициивнешние и внутренние источникиэффект дополненияэффект замещениясдвиг предпочтений бизнесаresearch and developmentinvestmentinternal and external sourcesshift of business preferenceseffect of substitutioneffect of complementarityReferencesИндикаторы науки. 2014: Статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2014Индикаторы науки. 2014: Статистический сборник. М.: НИУ ВШЭ, 2014Наука России в цифрах. 2012: Статистический сборник. М.: ЦИСН, 2012Наука России в цифрах. 2012: Статистический сборник. М.: ЦИСН, 2012Afcha S. Analyzing the Interaction between R&D Subsidies and Firm’s Innovation Strategy // Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 2012. Vol. 7 (3). Р. 57-70Afcha S. Analyzing the Interaction between R&D Subsidies and Firm’s Innovation Strategy // Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 2012. Vol. 7 (3). Р. 57-70Beneito P. The Innovative Performance of In-House and Contracted R&D in Terms of Patentsand Utility Models // Research Policy. 2006. Vol. 35 (4). Р 502-517Beneito P. The Innovative Performance of In-House and Contracted R&D in Terms of Patentsand Utility Models // Research Policy. 2006. Vol. 35 (4). Р 502-517Berchicci L. Towards an Open R&D System: Internal R&D Investment, External Knowledge Acquisition and Innovative Performance // Research Policy. 2013. Vol. 42 (1). Р 117-127Berchicci L. Towards an Open R&D System: Internal R&D Investment, External Knowledge Acquisition and Innovative Performance // Research Policy. 2013. Vol. 42 (1). Р 117-127Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition // Management Science. 2006. Vol. 52 (1). Р 68-82Cassiman B., Veugelers R. In Search of Complementarity in Innovation Strategy: Internal R&D and External Knowledge Acquisition // Management Science. 2006. Vol. 52 (1). Р 68-82Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003Chesbrough H. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press, 2003Deloitte Global Survey of R&D Tax Incentives, 2013. [online], Deloitte Global Services Limited. URL: http://www.deloitte.com/Deloitte Global Survey of R&D Tax Incentives, 2013. [online], Deloitte Global Services Limited. URL: http://www.deloitte.com/Grimpe C., Kaiser U. Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing // Journal of Management Studies. 2010. Vol. 47 (2). Р 1483-1509Grimpe C., Kaiser U. Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing // Journal of Management Studies. 2010. Vol. 47 (2). Р 1483-1509Hagedoorn J., Wang N. Is There Complementarity or Substitutability Between Internal and External R&D Strateges? // Research Policy. 2012. Vol. 41 (6). Р 1072-1083Hagedoorn J., Wang N. Is There Complementarity or Substitutability Between Internal and External R&D Strateges? // Research Policy. 2012. Vol. 41 (6). Р 1072-1083Helfat C., Raubitschek R. Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products // Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue. 2000. Vol. 21 (10/11). Р 955-959Helfat C., Raubitschek R. Product Sequencing: Co-Evolution of Knowledge, Capabilities and Products // Strategic Management Journal, Special Issue. 2000. Vol. 21 (10/11). Р 955-959Hess A., Rothaermel F. Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects // Organization Science. 2007. Vol. 18. Р 898-921Hess A., Rothaermel F. Building Dynamic Capabilities: Innovation Driven by Individual-, Firm-, and Network-Level Effects // Organization Science. 2007. Vol. 18. Р 898-921Laursen K., Salter A. Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovative Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms // Strategic Management Journal. 2006. Vol. 27. Р. 131-150Laursen K., Salter A. Open for Innovation: The Role of Openness in Explaining Innovative Performance Among UK Manufacturing Firms // Strategic Management Journal. 2006. Vol. 27. Р. 131-150Lokshin B., Belderbos R., Carree M. The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence From a Dynamic Panel Data Model, 2007. [online], UNU-MERIT Working Papers. URL: http:// www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2007/ wp2007-026.pdfLokshin B., Belderbos R., Carree M. The Productivity Effects of Internal and External R&D: Evidence From a Dynamic Panel Data Model, 2007. [online], UNU-MERIT Working Papers. URL: http:// www.merit.unu.edu/publications/wppdf/2007/ wp2007-026.pdfMSTI Main Science and Technology Indicators [online], 2014. URL: http://www.oecd.org/MSTI Main Science and Technology Indicators [online], 2014. URL: http://www.oecd.org/Narula R. Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors // Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2001. Vol. 13 (3). P. 365-388Narula R. Choosing Between Internal and Non-internal R&D Activities: Some Technological and Economic Factors // Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2001. Vol. 13 (3). P. 365-388NESTA China’s Absorptive State Research, Innovation and the Prospects for China-UK Collaboration. L.: NESTA, 2013NESTA China’s Absorptive State Research, Innovation and the Prospects for China-UK Collaboration. L.: NESTA, 2013OECD Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD, 2002OECD Frascati Manual: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. Paris: OECD, 2002OECD Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital. Paris: OECD, 2013OECD Supporting Investment in Knowledge Capital. Paris: OECD, 2013Piga C., Vivarelli M. Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach // Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2004. Vol. 66. P. 457-482Piga C., Vivarelli M. Internal and External R&D: A Sample Selection Approach // Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 2004. Vol. 66. P. 457-482Porter M.E. The Competitive Avantage of Nations. N.Y.: The Free Press, 1990Porter M.E. The Competitive Avantage of Nations. N.Y.: The Free Press, 1990PwC. Research and development in the BRICS. Global R&D Tax News. Issue, 2012. № 5. Р. 19PwC. Research and development in the BRICS. Global R&D Tax News. Issue, 2012. № 5. Р. 19Teece D. Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy // Research Policy. 1986. Vol. 15. Р. 285-305Teece D. Profiting From Technological Innovation: Implications for Integration, Collaboration, Licensing and Public Policy // Research Policy. 1986. Vol. 15. Р. 285-305The World Bank, 2014. [online]. URL: http://www. worldbank.org/The World Bank, 2014. [online]. URL: http://www. worldbank.org/Vega-Jurado J., Gutirrez-Gracia A., Fernandez-de-Lucio IVega-Jurado J., Gutirrez-Gracia A., Fernandez-de-Lucio IDoes External Knowledge Sourcing Matter for Innovation? Evidence from the Spanish Manufacturing Industry // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2009. Vol. 18. P. 637-670Does External Knowledge Sourcing Matter for Innovation? Evidence from the Spanish Manufacturing Industry // Industrial and Corporate Change. 2009. Vol. 18. P. 637-670Veugelers R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing // Research Policy. 1997. Vol. 26. P. 303-315Veugelers R. Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing // Research Policy. 1997. Vol. 26. P. 303-315Wang E.C. Determinants of R&D investment: The ExtremeBounds-Analysis approach applied to 26 OECD countries // Research Policy. 2010. Vol. 39. P. 103-116Wang E.C. Determinants of R&D investment: The ExtremeBounds-Analysis approach applied to 26 OECD countries // Research Policy. 2010. Vol. 39. P. 103-116Watkins T.A., Paff L.A. Absorptive Capacity and R&D Tax Policy: Are In-House and External Contract R&D Substitutes or Complements? // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 33 (2). P. 207-227Watkins T.A., Paff L.A. Absorptive Capacity and R&D Tax Policy: Are In-House and External Contract R&D Substitutes or Complements? // Small Business Economics. 2009. Vol. 33 (2). P. 207-227Weigelt C. The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2009. № 30. Р. 595-616Weigelt C. The impact of outsourcing new technologies on integrative capabilities and performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2009. № 30. Р. 595-616Woerter M. Competition and Persistence of R&D, Economics of Innovation and New Technology // Taylor & Francis Journals. 2014. Vol. 23 (5-6). Р. 469-489Woerter M. Competition and Persistence of R&D, Economics of Innovation and New Technology // Taylor & Francis Journals. 2014. Vol. 23 (5-6). Р. 469-489

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.