<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">ecr-journal</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Экономическая наука современной России</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Economics of Contemporary Russia</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1609-1442</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2618-8996</issn><publisher><publisher-name>Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.33293/1609-1442-2019-4(87)-126-136</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">ecr-journal-489</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКАЯ ПОЛИТИКА И ХОЗЯЙСТВЕННАЯ ПРАКТИКА</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>ECONOMICAL POLICY AND ECONOMICAL PRACTICE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Экосистемные компании: границы и этапы развития</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Ecosystem Companies: The Stages of Development and Limits</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0178-106X</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кобылко</surname><given-names>Александр Анатольевич</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kobylko</surname><given-names>Alexander A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат экономических наук, Ведущий научный сотрудник ЦЭМИ РАН, доцент МТУСИ</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">akobylko@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Центральный экономико-математический институт РАН, МТУСИ, Москва</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Central Economics and Mathematics Institute Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>27</day><month>12</month><year>2019</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>126</fpage><lpage>136</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2020</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2020</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences</copyright-holder><license xlink:href="https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/about/submissions#copyrightNotice</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/489">https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/489</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье рассматриваются экосистемные компании как совокупность предприятий, выпускающих широкую номенклатуру товаров и услуг. Особенность заключается в в предложении продуктов в различных отраслях под единой торговой маркой. Развитие экосистемы как набора предприятий из разных отраслей формирует отношение к ней, прежде всего, как к бренду, а не как к юридическому лицу или группе компаний. В процессе исследования были уточнены граница понятия социально-экономическая экосистема и целевые свойства её элементов, а именно: гармоничность, дополняемость, всеобщность, бесшовность и связность. Была выстроена последовательность трансформаций компании в экосистемную через микро-, мезо- и индустриальный уровни масштабирования деятельности. Это позволило структурировать уровни развития экосистем, начиная от отдельного предприятия, к отраслеподобной структуре и к индустриальной сложной структуре. Экосистемные компании формируют новый подход к управлению такими структурами. Основное отличие такого управления от традиционного понимания менеджмента предприятия как набора цикличных и точечных решений, заключается в более мягком характере воздействий. Управленческие воздействия представляют из себя набор уникальных нецикличных решений, формирующих концепцию развития экосистемы. Взаимодействие экосистем между собой во внешней среде выстраивается тремя способами: через партнёрство в явном виде, скрытно в паразитарной форме и косвенно при помощи экосистемы-посредника. Соответственно, как официально оформленные партнёрские отношение или скрытое использование в будущем приведёт к интеграционным процессам слияния и поглощения экосистем, для которых необходим специфический управленческий аппарат, основанный на специфики сложности таких структур.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The article discusses ecosystem companies. This is a set of enterprises that produce a wide range of goods and services in various industries and under a single brand. The development of an ecosystem forms an attitude towards it as a brand, and not as a legal entity or a group of companies. This brand is represented as a set of goods and services from different industries. This study clarified the boundaries of the concept of socio-economic ecosystem and the target properties of its elements. These elements are harmony, complementarity, universality, seamlessness and connectedness. The article formulates the sequence of transformations of the company into an ecosystem. Transformation occurs through micro-, meso- and industrial levels of activity. This allowed us to structure the levels of ecosystem development. The initial level is a separate enterprise, then to the industry structure and, as a result, to the industrial structure. Ecosystem companies form a new approach to managing large and complex structures. Its main difference is a set of cyclic and point solutions. Such control is characterized by milder effects. Ecosystem management is a set of unique non-cyclic solutions that form the concept of ecosystem development. There are three ways ecosystems interact with each other. The first is an explicit partnership, the second is secretive in a parasitic form, and the third is indirectly through an intermediary ecosystem. Similar ways of interaction in the future will lead to integration processes of merging and absorption of ecosystems. These processes require a particular managerial staff, taking into account large and complex structures.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экосистема</kwd><kwd>экосистемная компания</kwd><kwd>системная экономическая теория</kwd><kwd>индустрия</kwd><kwd>развитие экосистем</kwd><kwd>управление экосистемой</kwd><kwd>взаимодействие экосистем</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>ecosystem</kwd><kwd>ecosystem company</kwd><kwd>system economic theory</kwd><kwd>industry</kwd><kwd>ecosystem development</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group><funding-statement xml:lang="ru">Работа выполнена при финансовой поддержке Российского научного фонда (проект № 19-18-00335).</funding-statement><funding-statement xml:lang="en">This work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project No. 19-18-00335).</funding-statement></funding-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Белоусов Д. Р., Пенухина Е . А. О построении качественной модели российской экосистемы ИКТ // Проблемы прогнозирования. 2018. № 3. С. 94–104.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adner R. (2006). Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 98–107 .</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клейнер Г. Б. Новая теории экономических систем и ее приложения // Журнал экономической теории. 2010. № 3. С. 41–58.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Adner R. (2012). The Wide Lens: A new strategy for innovation. London, Penguin, 288 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Клейнер Г. Б. Промышленные экосистемы: взгляд в будущее // Экономическое возрождение России. 2018. № 2. С. 53–62.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Belousov D. R., Penukhina E. A. (2018). On the Construction of a Qualitative Model of the Russian ICT Ecosystem. Problems of Forecast, no. 3, pp. 94–104 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кобылко А. А. Современные операторы связи: исследование с позиции системной экономической</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ceccagnoli M., Forman C., Huang P., Wu D. J. (2012). Co-creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The case of enterprise software. MIS Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 263–290.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">теории // Экономическая наука современной России. 2016. № 2. С. 118–124.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Gawer A. (2014). Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an integra tive framework. Research Policy, vol. 43, no. 7, pp. 1239–1249.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кобылко А. А. Межсистемное взаимодействие в деятельности телекоммуникационных операторов // Terra Economicus. 2019. № 1. С. 77–93. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-1-77-93.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Iansiti M., Levien R. (2004). The Keystone Advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 255 p.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Конопатов С. Н., Салиенко Н. В. Анализ бизнес-моделей на основе платформ // Научный журнал НИУ ИТМО . Сер. Экономика и экологический менеджмент. 2018. № 1. С. 21–32. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2018-11-1-21-32.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 2255–2276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Полтерович В. М. От социального либерализма – к философии сотрудничества // Общественные науки и современность. 2015. № 4. С. 41–64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kapoor R., Lee J. M. (2013). Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 274–296.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Смородинская Н. В. Сетевые инновационные экосистемы и их роль в динамизации экономического роста // Инновации. 2014. № 7. С. 27–33.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kleyner G. B. (2010). The New Theory of Economic Systems and Its Applications. Journal of Economic Theory, no. 3, pp. 41–58 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Угнич Е . А. Экосистемный подход к исследованию инновационных процессов // Россия в глобальной экономике: вызовы и институты развития: материалы III Международного политэкономического конгресса и VI Международной научно-практической конференции: Т. 2 / под ред. М. А . Боровской, Ю. М . Осипова, А. В . Бузгалина, А. Ю. А рхипова. Ростов н/Д.: Изд-во Южного федерального ун-та, 2016. С. 92–96.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kleyner G. B. (2018). Industrial ecosystems: Foresight. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 2, pp. 53–62 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шерешева М. Ю., Кульгаева К. М. Роль экосистемы бренда в решении задач маркетинга высокотехнологичных продуктов // Вестник Балтийского федерального университета им. И. Канта. Сер. Гуманитарные и общественные науки. 2013. № 9. С. 141–146.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kobylko A. A. (2016). Modern Telecommunication Operators: A Study from the Point of View of the System Economic Theory. Economics of Contemporary Russia, no. 2, pp. 118–124 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adner R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem // Harvard Business Review. 2006. Vol. 84. № 4. Р. 98–107.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kobylko A. A. (2019). Intersystem interaction in the telecommunications operators’ activitiesv. Terra Economicus, no. 1, pp. 77–93. DOI: 10.23683/2073-6606-2019-17-1-77-93 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Adner R. The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. L., England: Penguin, 2012, 288 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Konopatov S. N., Salienko N. V. (2018). Platform-based business models. Scientific journal NRU ITMO. Series “Economics and Environmental Management”, no. 1, pp. 21–32. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2018-11-1-21-32 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ceccagnoli M., Forman C., Huang P., Wu D. J. Co-creation of Value in a Platform Ecosystem: The case of enterprise software // MIS Quarterly. 2012. Vol. 36. № 1. Р. 263–290.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Moore J. F. (1997). The Death of Competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. New York, Harper Business.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Gawer A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework // Research Policy. 2014. Vol. 43. № 7. Р. 1239–1249.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Polterovich V. M. (2015). From Social Liberalism Towards the Philosophy of Collaboration. Social Sciences and Modernity, no. 4, pp. 41–64 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Iansiti M., Levien R. The Keystone Advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 2004. 255 p.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sheresheva M.Yu., Kulgayeva KM. (2013). The role of brand ecosystem in solving the tasks of hi-tech product marketing. IKBFU's Vestnik. Ser. The Humanities and Social Science, no. 9, pp. 141–146 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Jacobides M. G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. Towards a theory of ecosystems // Strategic Management Journal. 2018. Vol. 39. № 8. Р. 2255–2276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Smorodinskaya N. V. (2014). Network Innovation Ecosystems and their Role in Dynamisation of Ecoment nomic Growth. Innovations, no. 7, pp. 27–33 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kapoor R., Lee J. M. Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments // Strategic Management Journal. 2013. Vol. 34. № 3. Р. 274–296.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Tansley A. (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 284–307.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Moore J. F. The death of competition: Leadership and Strategy in the Age of Business Ecosystems. N.Y.: Harper Business, 1997.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teece D. J. (2007). Explicating Dynamic Capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 28, no. 13, pp. 1319–1350.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Tansley A. The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms // Ecology. 1935. Vol. 16. № 4. Р. 284–307.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ugnich E. A. (2016). Ecosystem approach to the study of innovation processes. Russia in the global economy: challenges and development institutions: proceedings of the III International political economic congress and VI International scientific and practical conference. Vol. 2. Ed. by M. A. Borovskoy, Yu. M. Osipova, A. V. Buzgalina, A.Yu. Arkhipova. Rostov-on-Don? SFEDU, pp. 92–96 (in Russian).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. Vol. 28. № 13. Р. 1319–1350.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Teece D. J. Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance // Strategic Management Journal. 2007. Vol. 28. № 13. Р. 1319–1350.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
