ecr-journalЭкономическая наука современной РоссииEconomics of Contemporary Russia1609-14422618-8996Regional Public Organization for Assistance to the Development of Institutions of the Department of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences10.33293/1609-1442-2019-4(87)-7-20ecr-journal-412Research ArticleАКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ПРОБЛЕМЫ ЭКОНОМИЧЕСКОЙ ТЕОРИИACTUAL PROBLEMS OF ECONOMICSПроблемы эволюции теории компаративного капитализма с середины XX в. (на примере развитых стран мира)Problems of the Evolution of the Comparative Capitalism Theory from the mid‑20th Century (On the Example of the Developed Countries)ЛобановМихаил МихайловичLobanovMikhail M.

к.геогр.н., старший научный сотрудник

SPIN-код: 5665-9980

m.m.lobanov@yandex.ruГлинкинаСветлана ПавловнаGlinkinaSvetlana P.

д.э.н., профессор, руководитель научного направления «Международные экономические и политические исследования» (ИЭ РАН), зав. кафедрой Общей экономической теории Московской школы экономики

sveglinkina@yandex.ruМосковский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова, Институт экономики РАН, МоскваРоссияCenter for Eastern European studies, Institute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, MoscowRussian FederationИнститута экономики РАН, Московская школа экономики Московского государственного университета имени М.В. Ломоносова, МоскваРоссияInstitute of Economics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University, MoscowRussian Federation20192712201904720Copyright © Лобанов М.М., Глинкина С.П., 20202020Лобанов М.М., Глинкина С.П.Lobanov M.M., Glinkina S.P.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.ecr-journal.ru/jour/article/view/412

В конце XX – начале XXI в. предметом широкой научной дискуссии стала проблематика теоретического обоснования межстрановых различий в формах капиталистических отношений. Данная работа посвящена изучению представлений о причинах и следствиях дифференциации принципов организации капиталистического общества, при этом авторы сознательно ограничивают ее географический охват экономически развитыми странами. Именно государства мирохозяйственного центра были в фокусе исследований второй половины XX в., в той или иной мере использовавших методы сравнительного анализа в рамках теорий регуляции,  девелопментализма, зависимого капитализма, неокорпоратизма, постфордизма и др.  Современные концепции компаративного капитализма, в особенности акцентирующие внимание на государствах с формирующимися рынками, базируются на разнообразных подходах к выделению национальных моделей капиталистических отношений. Несмотря на плюрализм типологических критериев, многие из этих подходов в основе содержат положения разработанной в начале 2000-х гг. теории «разновидностей капитализма» (varieties of capitalism, VoC). Отталкиваясь от ее ключевого постулата о существовании различных видов институциональной комплементарности, авторы статьи объясняют принципы дивергенции либеральных и координируемых рыночных экономик, а также анализируют обоснования для выделения смешанного типа капитализма. Следует отметить, что остается открытым вопрос о перспективах адаптации положений бинарной теории «разновидностей капитализма» для анализа опыта стран с формирующимися рынками, в том числе постсоциалистических. Примечательно, что в период восстановления после экономического кризиса конца 2000-х гг. VoC-подход претерпел определенную трансформацию под влиянием новых условий  функционирования мирового хозяйства, противопоставив альтернативным теориям организации капиталистических систем собственную методологическую гибкость.

In the late 20th and early 21st centuries the problem of theoretical substantiation of transnational differences in the forms of capitalist relations became the subject of a broad scientific discussion. Given article deals with the ideas about the causes and consequences of the differentiation of the principles of capitalist society organization, and the authors consciously limit its geographical coverage to developed countries. It was the states of the Core of World economy that were in the focus of publications of the second half of the 20th centurywhich used the methods of comparative analysis within the framework of the theories of regulation, developmentalism, dependent capitalism, neo-corporatism, post-Fordism, etc. Modern concepts of comparative capitalism, especially focusing on emerging markets, are based on a variety of approaches to distinguish national models of capitalist relations. Despite the pluralism of typological criteria, many of these approaches basically contain provisions of the “varieties of capitalism” theory (VoC) developed in the early 2000s. Relying on its key postulate on the existence of various types of institutional complementarity, the authors of given article explain the principles of divergence of liberal and coordinated market economies, as well as analyze the groundings for identifying a mixed type of capitalism. It should be noted that the prospects for the adaptation of provisions of “varieties of capitalism” binary theory to analyze the experience of countries with emerging markets, including post-socialist states, remain vague. It’s noteworthy, that during the post-crisis recovery period of the late 2000s the VoC approach has undergone a certain transformation under the influence of new conditions of global economy functioning, having opposed its own methodological flexibility to the spread of alternative theories of the organization of capitalist systems.

Компаративный капитализмразновидности капитализмаинституциональная комплементарностьрыночная и стратегическая координациялиберальныекоординируемые и смешанные рыночные экономикидевелопментализмзависимый капитализмтеория регуляциифордизмcomparative capitalismvarieties of capitalisminstitutional complementaritymarket and strategic coordinationliberalcoordinated and mixed market economiesdevelopmentalismdependent capitalismregulation theoryFordism and post-FordismИсследование выполнено при финансовой поддержке РФФИ в рамках научного проекта № 18-010-00141 «Анализ моделей рыночной экономики в постсоциалистическом мире».The study was carried out with the financial support of the Russian Federal Property Fund in the framework of the scientific project No. 18-010-00141 “Analysis of market economy models in the post-socialist world”.ReferencesГлинкина С. П. К вопросу о разнообразии моделей капитализма, или Что мы построили в результате трансформации: доклад. М.: Институт экономики РАН , 2016.Akamatsu K. (1962). A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries. Journal of Developing Economies, no. 1, pp. 3–25.Глинкина С. П., Куликова Н. В. О модели капитализма в Центрально-Восточной Европе // Вестник Института экономики Российской академии наук. 2018. № 3. С. 9–24.Albert M. (1993). Capitalism against capitalism. London, Whurr.Akamatsu K. A historical pattern of economic growth in developing countries // Journal of Developing Economies. 1962. № 1. P. 3–25.Aoki M. (1994). The Japanese firm as a system of attributes: a survey and research agenda. The Japanese firm: Sources of competitive strength. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Albert M. Capitalism against capitalism. L.: Whurr, 1993.Baccaro L., Pontusson J. (2016). Rethinking comparative political economy: The growth model perspective. Politics & Society, no. 44 (2), pp. 175–207.Aoki M. The Japanese firm as a system of attributes: A survey and research agenda. In: The Japanese firm: Sources of competitive strength. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.Becattini G. (ed.) (1987). Mercato e forzelocali: Il distretto industriale. Bologna, il Mulino.Baccaro L., Pontusson J. Rethinking comparative political economy: The growth model perspective // Politics & Society. 2016. № 44 (2). P. 175–207.Bohle D., Greskovits B. (2012). Capitalist Diversity on Europe’s Periphery. Ithaca, Cornell University Press.Becattini G. (ed.). Mercato e forzelocali: Il distretto industriale. Bologna: il Mulino, 1987.Boyer R. (1990). The regulation school: A critical introduction. Columbia University Press.Bohle D., Greskovits B. Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2012.Evans P. B. (1979). Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press.Boyer R. The regulation school: A critical introduction. Columbia University Press, 1990.Frank A. G. (1967). Capitalism and under development in Latin America. New York, NYU Press.Evans P. B. Dependent development: The alliance of multinational, state, and local capital in Brazil. Princeton University Press, 1979.Fukuyama F. (1992). The End of History and the Last Man, New York, Free Press.Frank A. G. Capitalism and under development in Latin America. N.Y.: NYU Press, 1967.Glinkina S. P. (2016). On the diversity of capitalism models, or What we have built as aresult of transformation: a report. Moscow: Institute of Economics RAS (in Russian).Fukuyama F. The end of history and the last man. N.Y.: Free Press, 1992.Glinkina S. P., Kulikova N. V. (2018). On the model of capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Vestnik Instituta Ekonomiki Rossiyskoy Akademii Nauk [Bulletin of the Institute of Economics of Russian Academy of Sciences], no. 3, pp. 9–24 (in Russian).Hall P. A. Varieties of сapitalism and the Euro сrisis // West European Politics. 2014. № 37 (6). P. 1223–1243.Hall P. A. (2014). Varieties of Capitalism and the Euro Crisis. West European Politics, no. 37 (6), pp. 1223–1243.Hall P. A. Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis // Journal of European Public Policy. 2018. № 25 (1). P. 7–30.Hall P. A. (2018). Varieties of capitalism in light of the euro crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, no. 25 (1), pp. 7–30.Hall P. A., Gingerich D. W. Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis // British Journal of Political Science. 2009. № 39 (3). P. 449–482.Hall P. A., Gingerich D. W. (2009). Varieties of capitalism and institutional complementarities in the political economy: An empirical analysis. British Journal of Political Science, no. 39 (3), pp. 449–482.Hall P., Soskice D. An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In: Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001a.Hall P., Soskice D. (2001a). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Hall P., Soskice D. (eds.) Varieties of capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001b.Hall P., Soskice D. (eds). (2001b). Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Hancké B. Unions, central banks, and EMU: Labour market institutions and monetary integration in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Hancké B. (2013). Unions, Central Banks, and EMU: Labour market institutions and monetary integration in Europe. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Harvey D. The spatial fix – Hegel, von Thunen, and Marx // Antipode. 1981. № 13 (3). P. 1–12.Harvey D. (1981). The spatial fix – Hegel, von Thunen, and Marx. Antipode, no. 13 (3), pp. 1–12.Hicks A., Kenworthy L. Cooperation and political economic performance in affluent democratic capitalism // American Journal of Sociology. 1998. № 103. P. 1631–1672.Hicks A., Kenworthy L. (1998). Cooperation and Political Economic Performance in Affluent Democratic Capitalism. American Journal of Sociology, no. 103, pp. 1631–72.Iversen T., Soskice D., Hope A. The Eurozone and political economic institutions // Annual Review of Political Science. 2016. № 19 (1). P. 163–185.Iversen T., Soskice D., Hope A. (2016). The Eurozone and political economic institutions. Annual Review of Political Science, no. 19 (1), pp. 163–185.Johnston A., Hancké B., Pant S. Comparative institutional advantage in theEuropean sovereign debt crisis // Comparative Political Studies. 2016. № 47 (13). P. 1771–1800.Johnston A., Hancké B., Pant S. (2016). Comparative institutional advantage in theEuropean sovereign debt crisis. Comparative Political Studies, no. 47 (13), pp. 1771–1800.Katzenstein P. J. Between power and plenty: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1977.Katzenstein P. J. (1977). Between power and plenty: Foreign economic policies of advanced industrial states. Madison, University of Wisconsin Press.Lehmbruch G., Schmitter P. C. (eds). Trends toward corporatist intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications, 1979.Lehmbruch G., Schmitter P. C. (eds). (1979). Trends toward corporatist intermediation. Beverly Hills, Sage Publications.Massey D. Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. L.: Macmillan Press, 1995.Massey, D. (1995). Spatial divisions of labour: Social structures and the geography of production. London, Macmillan Press.Nölke A., Vliegenthart A. Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe // World politics. 2009. № 61 (4). P. 670–702.Nölke A., Vliegenthart A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependentPiore M. J., Sabel C. F. The Second industrial divide: Conditions for prosperity, 1984.market economies in East Central Europe. World politics, no.61 (4), pp. 670–702.Rostow W. W. The stages of economic growth: A noncommunist manifesto. Cambridge University Press, 1960.Piore M. J., Sabel C. F. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide: Conditions for Prosperity.Scott A. J. New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. Vol. 3. L.: Pion Ltd, 1988.Rostow W. W. (1960). The Stages of Economic Growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge University Press.Shonfield A. Modern capitalism. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1965.Scott A. J. (1988). New industrial spaces: Flexible production organization and regional development in North America and Western Europe. Vol. 3. London, Pion Ltd.Whitley R. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. N.Y.: Oxford University Press, 1999.Shonfield A. (1965). Modern Capitalism. New York, Oxford University Press.Workers of the world, log on! // The Economist. November 17, 2018.Whitley R. (1999). Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. New York, OUP Oxford.Workers of the world, log on! (2018). The Economist, November 17.Workers of the world, log on! (2018). The Economist, November 17.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.